india fowl tactics what a disgrace

imran nazier ws injured n the indian team knew this n so when imran wanted a runner india did not let him hv 1. i jus think this wsnt fare play n shows that india was and is scared of what pakistan can do.

Originally posted by: princessnida

i think you should just take the results in good spirit... 😊

the game was played very fairly!! 👏👏

india itself had an injured player, Sehwag...and they decided NOT to have him play this game because they weren't sure whether they would be allowed to have a runner or not...
so i think pakistan should have NOT had Imran Nazir play if they were not sure about whether or not they were going to have a runner....

anyways...the match was played in amazing spirit👏👏...and i don't think you should look at the match so negatively... 😳

the match was played fairly...and i think you should look at it positively..and be happy that both teams performed AMAZINGLY!👏

i agree with you completely

uhmmmm don't take it negatively 😕

btw gud played by both teams!

😛

well if u didn't tk risks in cricket then u dnt no what wud happen. Imran nazier playe amazingly. BTW im nt luking at it in a negative way. I just vooced ONE of my opinions on this game. Wic to me seems fare. Yeah i do acknowledge that india did play amazingly as well but all im saying is wud the runn er have been accepted for nazier, now thats a retoric so take ur tym

Originally posted by: farah_rehman

imran nazier ws injured n the indian team knew this n so when imran wanted a runner india did not let him hv 1. i jus think this wsnt fare play n shows that india was and is scared of what pakistan can do.

hmm... i don't know much about this....but still have something to say....when he played against NZ..he had an injury then too...and was allowed a runner by NZ (who later on said that imran wasn't injured...cuz of the way he danced, etc after winning)....that's natural...ab jeet mein toh you forget everything

but the point is if he was injured then he/the board/his team should have chose for him not to play...they knew if might affect their play then why did they allow it?

i am going to use the example from above...sehwag had some problem...and knew he wouldn't be able to run....thus he was replaced...

i don't know how true the NZ captain is in saying that he wasn't in that much pain that he would need a runner...

better choice would have been not to play...

but o well....it's just cricket...don't let these differences come in between 😃

Originally posted by: mango

hmm... i don't know much about this....but still have something to say....when he played against NZ..he had an injury then too...and was allowed a runner by NZ (who later on said that imran wasn't injured...cuz of the way he danced, etc after winning)....that's natural...ab jeet mein toh you forget everything

but the point is if he was injured then he/the board/his team should have chose for him not to play...they knew if might affect their play then why did they allow it?

i am going to use the example from above...sehwag had some problem...and knew he wouldn't be able to run....thus he was replaced...

i don't kno

w how true the NZ captain is in saying that he wasn't in that much pain that he would need a runner...

better choice would have been not to play...

but o well....it's just cricket...don't let these differences come in between 😃

well now and again u have totake risks dnt u. congrats n all to india well played but im also happy that PAKISTAN got into the final. Both teams played brilliantly.

Actually, it was the umpires who did not let Imran hav a runner for him..they asked him to continue for that over...Maybe after that over, they wud hav allowed him..but unfortunately, he got run out!!! And I think that was the biggest mistake and the turning point!! Younis and Imran shudnt hav run for that short run!

Pak did well 😳
hope the team performs xxxlnt in future 😳 also 👏