'It was an honest mistake, intentions were correct' - Anushka

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

WinterAesthetics

@DanceUntilWeDie

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#91

Ppl saying we'll attack n burning effigies is awful.

But still if she had just said something like I made a mistake n I feel bad it wud have lessened it.

Quote

864500

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#92

People and their over-reaction 😵

i don't even know who this guy is But its just a guy and his name

who cares man jeez

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Bazigar

@Bazigar

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

#93

Originally posted by: Live2eat
Ppl saying we'll attack n burning effigies is awful.
But still if she had just said something like I made a mistake n I feel bad it wud have lessened it.

Regarding mistake part yes it is not impossible to mix up Abdul kalam and add azad , as most of us are acquainted with azad name by similar sounding freedom fighter adul kalam azad in schooling etc. It is not impossible to make a goof up. Obviously if we look at logic then her intention was APJ adbul kalam. When lot of people attack someone continuously than anyone prone to repeat the mistake and even she admitted that. Which more than enough reflect in the above statement. By the way she deleted all her previous tweets and posted a correct one. For that the way people are hounding her is not justified.

Infact how many of those trolls know the full name of APJ abdul Kalam if they did attack her in all possible way in twitter on the issue of correct name.. I dont know the authencity of raman singh, still everyone make mistake even modi himself like M R S srisena , mohanlal etc.

regarding her reaction i did not find anything wrong . Its just a reaction to those trolls action .As all of them abuse her in all kind of words she just said they are faceless trolls who cant say the same infront of her. . If we closely observe the way those trolls abuse her then certainly we will find sexist , misogynist overtone in them and more than their any love for kalam.

Lets we can do an experiment , lets assume situation of a celebrity here and we have data of family, self, look and everything. Lets we will call her randi , bhand ke dimag mai kya hai , throw acid etc. etc. with a condition she cant reply us, As premises is that person is a celebrity she cant react to troll or reply them as response were thousands in number.

She just said they are faceless troll having no gut. What is wrong in this , where is weakness in this ? its just a reply to them .

In conclusion she react to troll in proper channel than we call her weak , why a reaction in proper channel should be called as sign of weakness. what should be her reaction troll bahi log i am rock solid, jitna abuse karna hai karlo 😆 ,

Quote

pakeezah

@pakeezah

Inactive

Posted: 10 years ago

#94

Originally posted by: Star_girl

Listen, go whine about your victimized goddess to someone more gullible. She is not the first celebrity to suffer some insults nor will be the last. She is an insecure crier since the day she started. I can understand your sexism buzzword for the World Cup issue because there she literally was insulted for no reason but this is plain ridiculous and she is the only one to blame. Always crying about how the world is so unfair and people are so mean. Suck it up. Pathetic whiny crier is my conclusion.

----

Calling trolls out and calling them faceless cowards behind computer isnt whining😆. She is bajaoing these cowards bajaa.

If she gets asked at an event to clarify and she does, it isnt whining. If she gives ten interviews crying, that is whining.