Mangala turns negative - Page 17

Originally posted by: Missesha

I suppose, Mangala too should be punished for indulging in Bal Vivah of an infant. But just before Anandi punishes Mangala let her also punish Ds for her Anandi's own bal vivah.

Anandi was a kid when she lied and it was acceptable but one day she became an adult and also became a victim of adultery/ bal vivah. So at that point she should have punished Ds Bhairon Sumi and Khajan

Let her punish them now.

And Anandi herself should be jailed too for supporting her offenders for too long. And for not reporting against those who pushed her into bal vivah.

If Anandi can do that, then sure Mangala deserves to be jailed.

Originally posted by: SPuja

It is not the intention to say all three cases are same. It is about nature vs nurture. The three children being brought up by some foster care (Amol and Mannu adopted while Nimboli just got saved and living as daughter-in-law) and somehow creatives want to convey that biological parents have more right than foster care. Perhaps this was brought up in context when people said - saving the life of a girl does not give Mangala right over Nimboli etc. etc.

I always say that creatives write from the point of view of adults and ignore children's point of view. So, Amol knew that he was adopted - and had accepted her adoptive parents and then suddenly his biological parents appeared. It was hard to accept them - he was weeping - still was pressurised to go with them (it is another matter that they let him with Anandi). Mannu got to know about his biological father in most cruel manner - still after initial shock - they made him negative (just as it is expected for Mangala to go negative). Nimboli will had it easier - she knows she is not daughter of the house - still if her mother is this powerful that she can defeat Akhera the terrorist - how come she took so many years to reach her. Since Nimboli is their future lead - I hope at least this time the track will show the view point of the child also.