history fictionalised ?highly disappointed

Page

Next Last

Radhakrishnan

@Shivam.

Explorer

Posted: 10 years ago

i dont think its well researched show,lot of fictionalization
helan not such bad,chankya molded as weird character,
above all Bindusara not a lame king at all,he is one who brought southindia under Mauryan control except Kalinga (Ashoka only war with kalinga)

i expect a lot from the maker but they highly disappointed me
they running away from the truth

Quote

Frequent Posters

Ramya

@Samrata-Addictz

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

unnecessary hype created that's all

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

_QueenBee_

@_QueenBee_

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

you are absolutely right !! this show turning to be another disappointment !! 🤢

was eagerly looking forward to it but now will stop watching after couple of days !!!

they want history to be reduced to any idiotic stories of regular soap opera just with historical background !! 🥱

now a days its becoming fashion to show distorted history as soap opera !! creating confusion in young minds !! wish something can be done about it !!

historians should publicly discredit & discourage such shows or make them part of script writing !! 😕

Quote

Ms.SK

@Ms.SK

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 10 years ago

agree with all of you. disappointed with the show. bindusara who conquered lots of states is shown lame as TM says above. I feel king's reign being rushed to bring in the name sake Ashoka in the show.

Quote

-RW-

@-RW-

Beginner

Posted: 10 years ago

I missed 2-3 episodes but i hope contiloe doesn't ruin this show like MP .

Quote

Shivani Priyam Kumar

@Meself

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

Disappointment would be a gross understatement! I am bloody pissed at their audacity to ruin history!😡

Quote

Mahadevi

@Morana

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 10 years ago

There is not a drop of historical fact in this show. What a joke !! No sign of any kind of research. Even a 5 year old Indian kid knows much better history than this people are showing.

But I think we are to blame , not the makers. In any other country they wouldn't have dared to make such an insult to their history n traditions. But we are so loose n lax about our history , that we won't even unite to protest n condemn this show publicly.

Quote

Ramya

@Samrata-Addictz

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Bamonforever
There is not a drop of historical fact in this show. What a joke !! No sign of any kind of research. Even a 5 year old Indian kid knows much better history than this people are showing.
But I think we are to blame , not the makers. In any other country they wouldn't have dared to make such an insult to their history n traditions. But we are so loose n lax about our history , that we won't even unite to protest n condemn this show publicly.

i agreed what u told😊

Quote

Sakthi ragav

@.Samrata.

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

hey Ganesh
its not abt the actors but u see the character ,they are trying show something ,Islam was not excited while Mauryan role the country ,sorry for my remarks but the show seems to me influenced by RSS
they havent show chankya/bindusara/subandhu conflict,they neither following the soucrse from vayupurana nor from mahavamsam etc
totally a history show without history

Edited by Zindagi-Samrata - 10 years ago