Sumit is the producer of Diya aur Bati

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Three points

1- The story was fake not characters. Obviously to sound real and to irritate Gautam he probably picked a real character. Otherwise how would gautam irritate

2- When gautam made fun of Ali in mouth to mouth taunts - he used real character as well

When he called him ugly - it was real character

When he called him bald - it was real character

When he called him fraud - it was real character

When he called him chor - it was real character

When he and puneet called him nichla qasai - it was real character

3- Now Ali said he was fake and apologized? HAS THAT HYPOCRITE APOLOGIZED?

When he and puneet called him nichla qasai - it was real character

When he called him ganda aadmi - it was real character

When he involved his family - it was real family

3- Now Ali said he was fake and apologized?

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Three points

1- The story was fake not characters. Obviously to sound real and to irritate Gautam he probably picked a real character. Otherwise how would gautam irritate

2- When gautam made fun of Ali in mouth to mouth taunts - he used real character as well

When he called him ugly - it was real character

When he called him bald - it was real character

When he called him fraud - it was real character

When he called him chor - it was real character

When he and puneet called him nichla qasai - it was real character

When he called him ganda aadmi - it was real character

When he involved his family - it was real family

3- Now Ali said he was fake and apologized?

<font size="4">HAS THAT HYPOCRITE APOLOGIZED ONCE?</font>

Originally posted by: TheHazard

You put the TM in a Pants on Fire' situation 😆 the topic is officially dead 🤢

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Three points

1- The story was fake not characters. Obviously to sound real and to irritate Gautam he probably picked a real character. Otherwise how would gautam irritate

2- When gautam made fun of Ali in mouth to mouth taunts - he used real character as well

When he called him ugly - it was real character

When he called him bald - it was real character

When he called him fraud - it was real character

When he called him chor - it was real character

When he and puneet called him nichla qasai - it was real character

When he called him ganda aadmi - it was real character

When he involved his family - it was real family

3- Now Ali said he was fake and apologized?

HAS THAT HYPOCRITE APOLOGIZED ONCE?

Originally posted by: minzkumar

Ali is bald...fact... Ali is ugly fact. Ali is fraud fact... chor fact he has stolen things in the house so why should he apologise ???

Ali was defaming his character. Gautam can even along with Sumit file for character defamation. If characters are not fake and story is - charges on character defamation can be placed right away. This was just not morally wrong and dirty game he played but also a crime...law says that, not me.

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

I am sexy - fact

I am better looking than Shahruk, Aamir, Salman, Ranbir, Hrithik rolled into one - fact

I have 10 packs - fact

I am a King - fact

I am greatest there has ever been - fact

I am hungry - fact

1 hour left before I eat - fact

Menu options going in my mind - fact

I am going - fact

I am gone - fact

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Three points

1- The story was fake not characters. Obviously to sound real and to irritate Gautam he probably picked a real character. Otherwise how would gautam irritate

2- When gautam made fun of Ali in mouth to mouth taunts - he used real character as well

When he called him ugly - it was real character

When he called him bald - it was real character

When he called him fraud - it was real character

When he called him chor - it was real character

When he and puneet called him nichla qasai - it was real character

When he called him ganda aadmi - it was real character

When he involved his family - it was real family

3- Now Ali said he was fake and apologized?

HAS THAT HYPOCRITE APOLOGIZED ONCE?