Originally posted by: jyoti06
I dint goof up but did right calculation only 😆 .. his ranknig went up for first 2 weeks only when fans just came to know who is gautam gulati and so obviously commented on his profile as part of intro including me😆 ... after that they concentrated more on voting because he was nominated for nonstop 8 weeks in a row ... and then just a week before too again he was in nomination .. total out of 14 weeks , I guess he was in nomination for 9 to 10 weeks .. so too much work for the fans na 😳
Drop in popularity can b said when his name gets replaced by Pritam or XYZ names in every other website claiming the popular rankings including ORMAX .. And going by this logic of IF ranking , Sukirti should b most popular since her ranking was highest in first 2 weeks .. she was actually in top 10 as per IF rank 🤣
Just see Contradiction.
- First ...voting has diverted the focus from visiting his profile hence the drop in rating
- Now ...IF is irrelevant to reality show
Not sure you got my question right...here once again trying to explain...see below
Point no 1 = absolute popularity...i.e Gautam in week X vis a vis Gautam in week Y (trend of popularity of an individual across time scale when assessment parameters remain unchanged ) ...,..we know Gautam went to 21 in week 2 ...remained there for couple of weeks...then drifted slowly ...and dropped drastically in last 2-3 weeks ( when he was NOT NOMINATED... so voting reason goes for a toss)... Hence can be deduced as drop in popularity ( 21 position is higher than 137) ...so your argument doesn't hold ground...and yet you are denying .
Point no 2 = relative popularity ...i.e that Gautam in comparison with others...your occlusion is based on th assumption that the link you pasted and ORMAX are credible and that IF Television Celebrity index is baseless ...I can see you are well aware of IF methodology hence I agree with your conclusion that it is baseless when it comes to assessing relative popularity ( like Sukriti example)...your point taken there...how did you conclude that the methodology followed by ORMAX and the site you mentioned in this thread are credible.
So question for you..below ...can't make it simpler
Q1 - point 1 - on absolute popularity...voting is not the reason for lack of focus as I proved...So what is the reason for his drastic drop in last 3 weeks when not nominated ?
Q2- point 2 - relative popularity... what is the methodology followed by ORMAX & the link in the thread...that makes you confident enough to give them certificate of authenticity ?
Just stick to answering this 2 question ...make it in bullets...so that it remains objective and focused.
P.S - btw don't deny the certificate of authenticity ...else your 1st post on the thread becomes redundant and the thread loses credibility ...🤣
Edited by MadOwhat - 10 years ago