Regressive Dadisa

Page

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

DS will deck up Gehna in jewellery again once she marries her off. Till then Gehna is supposed to be austere...with no jewellery, and plain simple clothes(which look better btw). While still being mean this way she acts like she's being a progressive naari by marrying Gehna to someone. She always likes to marry any single available person say it male or female. According to her, a spouse is must(I get how much she misses a partner though). So I don't understand how this marriage will be a progressive step.

On a serious note - To the writers--- Please reduce the jewellery of the married naari's and increase the jewellery of the widows in BV. That'll bring all of them at one level.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

And why is Nandu being given so much importance nowadays, that too all of a sudden?😳 An excuse for marriage? 👎🏼

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

The voice over in yesterday's episode - when loosely translated means how having a man is the key to happiness in woman's life🤢

This is nothing but a regressive track being passed off as a progressive act on the part of Dadisa.

Quote

-poloenigma-

@-poloenigma-

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

Gehna's remarriage progressive ? 🥱 My foot !! 🤢 How is forcing a women to marry a broke music teacher who can hardly support himself financially progressive ? I hope someone arm twists Daadisaa into marrying Daadu by emotional blackmailing, then we'll see what Kalyani Sabki-Shaadi-Karwado Devi has to say 😆 😆

Quote

Rashmi

@goofyCat

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

Agreed.

I hated yesterday's VO 👎🏼 Do CVs want to prove that happiness in every widow's life lies in finding a husband and getting married again? 🤢 Gehna was not leading a life which can be called as miserable after Basant's death. She had a supporting and loving family, 2 kids to look forward to, sound financial situation, a family business where she can invest her time and prove herself, and most importantly, she was not feeling need for a companion. Despite all this DS thinks that Gehna needs a man in her life, which is absolutely regressive.

Quote

anshurg5

@anshurg5

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

Forcing a woman to do something against her wishes is always regressive. If over the years Gahna herself would have felt the need of a companion or liked someone enough to marry him then DS could have supported her decision but forcing her DIL in the name of her and her kid's welfare is completely wrong. She herself has established a business and taken care of her kids alone. She could have motivated her DIL for doing the same . Though she has partially did that but instead of emphasizing on it more she lost her goal midway.

Now EBing Gahna for remarriage when she herself is not ready for it is totally unacceptable specially with Music Sa who himself could not do much with his life and depends on BH's good will for his livelihood .