Criticism is not mockery.
Characters are behaving out of character. Hence the question. The same Sakshi who used to notice everything didn't ask Durga how she knew about affair?
The same Durga who kept secrets effortlessly, made blunder of exposing herself with that affair statement?
Such obvious loopholes were never there in the show earlier.
Fingerprint argument is there because Dev didn't have gloves nor were gloves found in his car.
Loopholes are too obvious. One doesn't need to be working in crime branch to atleast get basics right.
Durga can save Dev. No problem. Problem is the implausible story. Raima just stood there, raised no alarm and waited to get shot? Nobody noticed when Sakshi came and left? Doors, gates were open? Or is she able to walk through gates without making noise?
Durga talks about affair and no one wonders how she knew it?
No one else is there at hospital yet still Sakshi tries to kill Raima without thinking that she would be doubted as Dev is in jail and only she is at hospital? She was not the one to take such risk.
Atleast situation should be believable! Case against Dev holds no water. Weak case.
Earlier when show was great and watertight, there used to be many threads praising it.
It is about honest opinions. Not negativity or positivity. As the show is, thus the feedback is.
Cricket
