babbars had 6 and lambas had 8 members in task..isn't unfair? - Page 2

Sonali and Upen weren't planning anything for the task!

As others have already stated...upen and Sonali were not in teams...they were lovers with a family of 6 members...

Originally posted by: ..Mishh007..

As others have already stated...upen and Sonali were not in teams...they were lovers with a family of 6 members...

Agar babbar 6 ke bajaay 16 hote tab bhi haarte...because they were busy shouting and whining instead of making strategies to win!

@bold 😆 True!!

Technically yes, because 8 were working for one goal and 6 against. The benefit would also go to 8 now if the task failed it would have gone to 6. But again Babbars would have anyway failed if it would have been the other way round, because they lacked in planning and strategy.

Originally posted by: -sunflower-

With Sonali completely supporting Lambas, the Lamba family had an upper hand in the task. The task should have been in such a way that Upen dont want to marry Sonali & the Lambas were forcefully trying to get him married to Sonali and Babbars trying to help Upen n stop the marriage. With one team very weak, the task look one sided like the first task.

I agree but I guess its not about size of the dogs in fight its about size of the fight in dogs
even if soni arya dandruff tanna would have been in lamba they would have failed

Originally posted by: mmuntaha

Sonali and Upen weren't planning anything for the task!

technically there were 6 member on each team, one team had to help them, and one team was suppose to keep them from accomplishing any task!

thanks..very well articulated...
babbars' poor strategy and planning failed them is a different story but bb initially made unfair team distribution, is my point..

thank u

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

Technically yes, because 8 were working for one goal and 6 against. The benefit would also go to 8 now if the task failed it would have gone to 6. But again Babbars would have anyway failed if it would have been the other way round, because they lacked in planning and strategy.

thanks...yes, as u said technically bb outnumbered babbars in comparison to lambas