Secularism ..is it absence of faith - Page 2

Originally posted by: sareg

Does the temple take funding from the govt?

Govt take the temples income.............but Why govt not take church' mousks income...........they geting money from diff part of world........why Govt not take.......??Govt taking two law for same things.

If yes, the govt can dictate what they want in rules, but then they have to apply the same rules to everyone

If not, the temple board can tell the govt to go you know where 😉

As for Mr Yesudas, excellent singer, love his music, but thanks but no thanks if the rules are Hindus only and you are not, you are not allowed, atleast the board is uniform in that aspect

About Yesudas.....He visiting,thirupathi, sabarimala and other hindu temples...each temple have their own rules....so we can't blame a particuler temple...Even in sabarimala over 13 girls cant enter.........but there allow all religious people, may be the rules change gradualy...The fact is Hinduism accepts changes....

Originally posted by: Swar_Raj

Agree with you Myth,
The agenda of CPIM like this one, is designed to divide communities. Indian politicians goal is to create identity and then rally them religiously for vote bank. ....All party not doing that...
If the CPI-M is bringing in a law to allow people of any faith to enter a temple if he is a believer, they should also simultaneously bring in a law allowing believers of any faith to enter churches and mosques in the state,(where in some mosques, woman are not allowed) if they have the guts to do so. Let missionries go to mosque and teach them too. 👏 well said

Lots of christians have joined the CPI-M (Wonder). But In communisam they not telling dont believe in God...in china,russia,cuba,venuzela 90% people a are religious.
Mrs Gandhi was also not allowed inside the temple So what is such big deal ??? Are these people out of places to worship or suddenly their faith on our God has increased or they jus believe that hindu community is stupid and can be manupulated any way they want?

Stupid Stupid CPIM politicians 😡 🤢 What kind politicians are they..look at the rate of jobless peopel in WB and now here too, they have no concerns on any other advancement of the state, other then anti hindu activities 🤢

In india all party looks the Vote bank only😃

Originally posted by: s.priya

Funding - That temple can fund some part of the govt... 😳

the point is the temple or the religious place is covered under some tax shelter, if they do, then the implicitly are assumed to the laws put on by the govt

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

I don't understand why the temple authorities don't permit Shri Yesudas to enter that temple inspite of being such a Krishna Bakht.

The rules are same for all. Yesudas is a Christian so he can't enter the temple premise. Sonia Gandhi was not allowed either and this time so much furor is over 'shudhikaranam' (cleaning ritual of temple' because of a wedding of minister's son. The minister is a Hindu and minister's wife (also a minister) is a Christian. Yesudas pleaded with authorities to allow him to sing in front of Guruvayoor and he claimed that he can open the doors with his singing.

Last year there was a controversial claim from a Kannada actress who said that she was allowed inside Sabarimala, a shrine which doesn't allow women between the age of 10 and 50. The controversy paved way for many findings and there is lot of deceiving involved from the topmost level of ministers, bureaucrats, tantri (the main pujari) to the lowest level workers. There are many findings which will never see the light.

In Kerala there are many temples with such stringent rules. I personally think it is time to let go off such rules and allow uniformity. I am saying this without bringing any Church or Mosque's deviant rules which would be another debate altogether😛. All religious places should have same regularity.

Originally posted by: Maya_M

The rules are same for all. Yesudas is a Christian so he can't enter the temple premise. Sonia Gandhi was not allowed either and this time so much furor is over 'shudhikaranam' (cleaning ritual of temple' because of a wedding of minister's son. The minister is a Hindu and minister's wife (also a minister) is a Christian. Yesudas pleaded with authorities to allow him to sing in front of Guruvayoor and he claimed that he can open the doors with his singing.

Last year there was a controversial claim from a Kannada actress who said that she was allowed inside Sabarimala, a shrine which doesn't allow women between the age of 10 and 50. The controversy paved way for many findings and there is lot of deceiving involved from the topmost level of ministers, bureaucrats, tantri (the main pujari) to the lowest level workers. There are many findings which will never see the light.

In Kerala there are many temples with such stringent rules. I personally think it is time to let go off such rules and allow uniformity. I am saying this without bringing any Church or Mosque's deviant rules which would be another debate altogether😛. All religious places should have same regularity.

true maya if god has not put down any such rules who r these human beings to follow all these disparities. i think people of any religion sex or age should be allowed inside any place of worship.

Originally posted by: Swar_Raj

God is supreme and yes no one should be stopped in visiting him. If we take this theory then why even visit God. He is everywhere. Aham Bhrama asmi
But if associate your feelings with a temple, then why should it be distroyed. if we talk about secularism, then why is it being forced only on temples?
The question is not why everyone should not be allowed to enter temple. Question is why laws are formed only for temples just because we have tolerence? Have you ever heard any compromises in Masjids. Send these missonaries to Mosque and see what happens to them. No politician will toch these laws. Why go further, we cannot touch shariyat, the law made only for muslims only IN INDIA. How long for the sake of Secularism, we will continue to hurt our own feelings. If it is secularism, then make it universal all over the country. And if not, then leave us Hindus alone too

u r right it should not be imposed on temples only. and hindus r not only tolerant they r even wise and we bend our rules and discard wht is not condusive and wrong and inhuman and unethical. and as to y politicians play with the feelings of majority i dont have any clue.