The importance of a father and parvarish

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
A father is so important in a child's life
This serial so well potrays this aspect. Akbar lost his father at age of 13-14. At 13 a child is in primary school 7th STD in these times. Akbar became an emperor at this age. And children of this age are highly impressionable. A child requires proper guidance till 16 years of age and that shapes the way a child behaves for rest of its life. Akbar's values, relationships, behaviour etc were shaped till 16years not under the able guidance of his father Humayun but his foster mother Maham and foster father Bairam Khan. That is because his parents especially father was in exile usually trying to save his life and family from enemies.
Bairam Khan and Maham took this opportunity to mould Akbar as per their whims and fancies. Where a humayun would have taught his son to forgive even dreaded enemies a Bairam Khan taught him to be ruthless and never forgive.
Where a Hamida would have taught him values of family, importance of a wife, treating all with respect etc a maham taught him to hate his own parents, she made him think his parents are his biggest enemies for having left him, she taught him that women are to be used for only pleasure, she taught him to treat only her and Adham more than fairly but all others with suspicion.
Maham sow the seeds of indebtness in him by repeatedly making him feel she had done him a favour by giving him her milk, taking care of him while in reality she and many other forster parents had been appointed to do exactly the same and paid and given more than deserving high positions to them all by Humayun. She never allowed ay of his other foster mothers, foster fathers to get close enough to him because she wanted to mould him as per herself so that in future he will remain a puppet in her hands. She went to an extent where she ensure even Akbar stays away from humayun and hamida after their exile and only go to her for everything. He had become a robot that she controlled with a remote of indebtness and hatred towards own parents. If Humayun had been around he would never have allowed these people to manipulate his son in such ways.
So from age of 3 months till 20 years Akbar grew up in the environment I mentioned above. But now suddenly he had many important new people coming in his life who started telling him how to modify his thinking. They brought new ideas, new thoughts, liberal views etc like Jodha who treated all equally, Salima who was practical not emotional in her decisions, Man singh who had a mind of his own and not scared to tell it to Akbar unlike other courtiers, Todarmal who had new ideas of reforms, Tansen who brought with him a new culture and art form. Slowly Akbar's vision broadened.
Even Atagha who was the few people who truly wanted Akbar's well being from childhood opened up and strated proving his views.
He no longer was dependent on only Maham for all advices. This made maham insecure, terrified of the prospect where Akbar was slowly becoming independent of her counsel and still successfully running his empire and endearing himself to his citizens and even enemies. She was slowly losing the remote of a robot she had assumed will dance as per her ideas. She forgot Akbar was an human not robot with a mind and heart of his own which will come to fore as he becomes big.
Akbar always had a sense of right and wrong as he would have got these from his parents Humayun and Hamida. But he was taught something else from birth. And with that his sense of gratitude and indebtness to Khan baba and Maham made him forget all their injustices and forgive Adham everytime. But what did that lead to actually it destroyed the very people whom he kept forgiving.
Khan baba was killed by his enemy and Maham on way to pilgrimage
Adham became so over ambitious by Akbar's repeated overlooking of his crimes he now assumed he can kill jalal and become emperor
And Maham well she killed his babies she tried getting to kill Akbar to make her son an emperor finally she lost adham her son only
This is called poetic justice
Now she curses Akbar saying that his babies will die. Akbar was a great son to Maham a great brother to adham and yet she cursed him. But that curse shall have no affect because Akbar has not done anything to her bad till date. A curse sticks if a person is truly grieved by you and the person cursing is a great human. Otherwise these curses are empty words.
So why did Akbar's all kids die till Salim. Some died as infant mortality was high, some were killed by maham and others may be by others. But curse was a definite no. And you never kknow God may want Akbar to grow mature and change before he became a parent. And it was true what a transformation it was from a ruthless dreaded warrior who was loved by none to a benevolent father to all his citizens, to a compassionate and forgiving person to his enemies, a person who united 4-5 religions together and treated all as one.
In jehangirnama jehangir says his parents over trust in people ensured his many siblings died. May be he was talking of Maham or other relatives and friends. Whatever it may be his birth was also a birth of a better Akbar a transformed Akbar a benevolent Akbar a compassionate Akbar. And its natural too when you see an innocent defenseless baby in your arms you realize that may be other humans are defenceless, may be they feel pain like your baby, may be they are scared as your baby, may be they need food like your baby etc When a father starts thinking all that he becomes not only a good father but a much better king. Mothers I usually say this many girls are born with these instincts not all but many. So its a man who changes most when he becomes a father. Jodha is already there almost as a mother but Akbar needs to get there. Its called self actualization or self realization.
Edited by myviewprem - 10 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

7

Views

1.9k

Users

5

Likes

21

Frequent Posters

Donjas thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
Once again a delightful post to read. Once again I give my brain cells a thorough work out.


SenpaiNOTICEME thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
Prem , I have mentionned in your previous post , your posts are truely a treat to read for readers like me ! I usually get easily enerved to read long redactions when these are especially made longer purposely by useless and repetitive blabbers to make it perceive prestigiously longer like a thesis but I must admit that while reading your posts , I can't even see how each paragraphs chain up to pursue the previous one , in order , one by one , everything is made clearly , short , highlighted and framed in few paragraphs , that the reader infront of it's screen would envy more to taste further this newly flavour ! Without sugar coating my words yours are exactly like with my mom : When she comes to cook something delicious that be for breakfast , lunch or dinner , first , I always say :"OK , I WOULDN'T CROSS MY LIMIT TODAY !" , and there I start to fill my mouth with a full spoon of the meal , it's simply so envying that after finishing one bowl , I will be like : "A LADLE MORE WOULDN'T BE THAT MUCH !" and it continues , so much that she is completely habited to this ritual of one more ladle now 😆😆 Briefly , the development accompanied with the maturity to perceive others views , apprehension of interpreting them fairly , comparing them with his owns , the trenchant of his decisions are no more made on emotional or relative basis , these I think really are the harvasted , sweet and soft fruits , great results in improvement of Jalal's concrescence ! What a mindful post proof of a great wisdom in way of reflecting residing in the Topic Maker 👏👏 ! Dr . Lobsang Sangye La , the current leader of Tibet after his holiness the 14th Dalai Lama has appointed many times in his numerous disquisitions that : "A RESPECT ISN'T BOUGHT , COMPROMISED , FORCED OR EXCHANGED , IT'S SIMPLY EARNT !" during the compaign for Free Tibet against Chinese Government so Prem I am telling you that you simply earnt my respect for you !
Edited by sweetystubborn - 10 years ago
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: sweetystubborn

Prem , I have mentionned in your previous post , your posts are truely a treat to read for readers like me ! I usually get easily enerved to read long redactions when these are especially made longer purposely by useless and repetitive blabbers to make it perceive prestigiously longer like a thesis but I must admit that while reading your posts , I can't even see how each paragraphs chain up to pursue the previous one , in order , one by one , everything is made clearly , short , highlighted and framed in few paragraphs , that the reader infront of it's screen would envy more to taste further this newly flavour ! Without sugar coating my words yours are exactly like with my mom : When she comes to cook something delicious that be for breakfast , lunch or dinner , first , I always say :"OK , I WOULDN'T CROSS MY LIMIT TODAY !" , and there I start to fill my mouth with a full spoon of the meal , it's simply so envying that after finishing one bowl , I will be like : "A LADLE MORE WOULDN'T BE THAT MUCH !" and it continues , so much that she is completely habited to this ritual of one more ladle now 😆😆 Briefly , the development accompanied with the maturity to perceive others views , apprehension of interpreting them fairly , comparing them with his owns , the trenchant of his decisions are no more made on emotional or relative basis , these I think really are the harvasted , sweet and soft fruits , great results in improvement of Jalal's concrescence ! What a mindful post proof of a great wisdom in way of reflecting residing in the Topic Maker 👏👏 ! Dr . Lobsang Sangye La , the current leader of Tibet after his holiness the 14th Dalai Lama has appointed many times in his numerous disquisitions that : "A RESPECT ISN'T BOUGHT , COMPROMISED , FORCED OR EXCHANGED , IT'S SIMPLY EARNT !" during the compaign for Free Tibet against Chinese Government so Prem I am telling you that you simply earnt my respect for you !

Thanks dear
I do not really deserve this level of your high praise for a simple post that was just written impromptu
actually I am fascinated by the complex relationship bet jalal-maham and adham
it reminds me of the parasite that destroys its own host after taking benefits out of it
while in actually it should have been a symbiotic relationship
SenpaiNOTICEME thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: myviewprem

Thanks dear
I do not really deserve this level of your high praise for a simple post that was just written impromptu
actually I am fascinated by the complex relationship bet jalal-maham and adham
it reminds me of the parasite that destroys its own host after taking benefits out of it
while in actually it should have been a symbiotic relationship


Impromptu or not , not everyone has this calm and vigilant insight of thinking as yours so that's really admirable 😃
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
I feel just looking at one Jalal, we cannot generalize and make sweeping statements.

Even in Jalal's case, Humayun was alive till Jalal was 13-14. His father had the opportunity to mould his son. It is well known that the initial few years are most crucial. Humayun did meet his son from time to time and he should have had better knowledge of the people he had appointed to take care of him. He should have known what kind of people were looking after his son and what values they were teaching him.

But he failed in this. So on what basis can we say a father would have ensured better upbringing? In fact, Humayun himself was not of very strong character and had quite a few weaknesses. If he had been around in Akbar's teenage years, Akbar might have learnt similar things.

In olden days, kings hardly looked after their children. Children were usually brought up by servants. So the concept of a father being necessary fails for most royal kids.

Since you mention Jahangir, Akbar was alive till Salim became an adult. Still he went against his father. Daniyal and Murad also went astray after they went to Deccan. Even though they also had the benefit of having a father till they had matured.

On the other hand, I know many families where the father is dead, or working outside or divorced. Still the children have turned up just fine. There is a saying in our community that a single mother can bring up kids. But a single father can't - he usually remarries so that he has a wife to look after him and his kids.

I have also seen families where children have gone astray in spite of having good fathers or been spoilt rotten by their fathers or just plain ignored by their fathers.


My conclusion :

A child will grow up as per its destiny. And the presence or absence of a father is also part of such destiny.
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: RadhikaS0

I feel just looking at one Jalal, we cannot generalize and make sweeping statements.

Even in Jalal's case, Humayun was alive till Jalal was 13-14. His father had the opportunity to mould his son. It is well known that the initial few years are most crucial. Humayun did meet his son from time to time and he should have had better knowledge of the people he had appointed to take care of him. He should have known what kind of people were looking after his son and what values they were teaching him.

But he failed in this. So on what basis can we say a father would have ensured better upbringing? In fact, Humayun himself was not of very strong character and had quite a few weaknesses. If he had been around in Akbar's teenage years, Akbar might have learnt similar things.

In olden days, kings hardly looked after their children. Children were usually brought up by servants. So the concept of a father being necessary fails for most royal kids.

Since you mention Jahangir, Akbar was alive till Salim became an adult. Still he went against his father. Daniyal and Murad also went astray after they went to Deccan. Even though they also had the benefit of having a father till they had matured.

On the other hand, I know many families where the father is dead, or working outside or divorced. Still the children have turned up just fine. There is a saying in our community that a single mother can bring up kids. But a single father can't - he usually remarries so that he has a wife to look after him and his kids.

I have also seen families where children have gone astray in spite of having good fathers or been spoilt rotten by their fathers or just plain ignored by their fathers.


My conclusion :

A child will grow up as per its destiny. And the presence or absence of a father is also part of such destiny.

I am talking from psychology point of view. It says every action and behaviour of human usually comes from real or perceived notion of past
Humayun defeated Kamran in 1553 and took over as king of Kabul. Till 1553 he was hardly there for Akbar. Even hamida would keep travelling with him to save their life from their own relatives and enemies. Only after 1553 Akbar stayed with Humayun and Hamida as a family. So Humayun was hardly there for 3-4 years continuously with his son. So majority time he was with his foster parents only.
How does an Humayun who is rarely there at home know what his foster parents are doing to kids. In 21st century parents leave kids in PG and with maids. Do parents have any idea what exactly happens there how kids are behaved at? Have we not seen maids banging kids, renting them to beggars for begging for a few hours, scaring them etc. I know someone who is terrified of cockroach and fire because the maid would scare them in childhood. Kids are pure hearted they have no fear, no hatred etc. They learn all that by observing adults.
Humayun of course had addiction to opium, he was a bit lazy too and was a bit more forgiving by nature. Now these are not grave weaknesses and no father will teach his son I am eating opium you too eat. Or I am a bit lazy you too become etc. Parents always want their kids to become better humans than they themselves ever were and will not teach their bad habits to them.
Take for example Jehangir a chronic drinker and opium addict. He ensure none of his kids had both these bad habits. Take example of Akbar he did not study but ensure his son is very learned. So no parent want his son//daughter to follow his bad habits.
Jehangir rebelled indeed that is because his friends and advisors told this is good opportunity you can go and capture the treasury of agra fort and use it to establish your own empire. Jehangir did not think of that plan he is not that clever and street smart man. And this rebellion had a few personal angels too beside half baked political ambitions. Murad and Daniyal were sent away at vulnerable ages under other's guidance to deccan etc. Without family for company and friends whose only aim is to get into your good books at cost of your life(chamchas) kids especially boys will spoil only. Its similar to a child living in hostel versus own house. Exceptions are always there.
If all of Akbar's kids rebelled or drank themselves to death or disobeyed their parents there may be personal reasons to it. May be their parents did not give them enough time, they were given too much freedom and how much ever money and material things they asked. The environment they grew up in they saw their elders too drinking, making merry, killing own family to keep throne, having many wives and cocubbines, no loyalty and love to one wife etc. Kids assume that its OK to do all that. Who knows if humayun lived long enough Akbar and hakim would have also rebelled? How are we to assume they would not?
And another big reason salim went to war field at 7 years, murad and daniyal at 13-14. Its no easy task to kill and look at brutal killings in front of your own eyes at that age. It leads to lot of mental disorders like depression etc. You can google effect of war on child soldiers. So there are lots of factors that can make kids wayward even if parents are there.
Jehangir held some notions against his father- one his love for meherunissa aka nur jahan later was not approved off, he felt abul fazl was always speaking against salim and his brothers to Akbar and Akbar trusted him more than his kids, he wanted to become king fast as he was already 33 years and was scared he may die young and never become king etc.
You are right single parents can be great parents - I know of single fathers and their kids are excellently brought up too.
I think a child shall become what you mould it into in its formative ages especially from 4 years to 16 years. I am talking of character moulding. Destiny is different. Your destiny may be failure but you can grow up to be an excellent human if your formative years are great and get proper guidance and love. Royal familes are not great places for a child to be brought up to be a great human for sure .
RSlovesJA thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#8
Good post.. Maham proved here whom actually she loves..

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".