Unfair awards?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

sara rafeek

@Ooolalala

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: -koiza-
I think lolo deserved a NA for Fiza or zubaida instead

her act in DTPH was good but not worthy of a NA imo

but many a times when your opposite a weaker actress you get more recognition- same happened to lolo in DTPH and also anu in JTHJ.

but lolo was amazing in the movie- NA well deserved or not remains debatable for me at least

Madhuri and weak 😆 Are you kidding me?

Quote

448368

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#32

Filmfare editor Jitesh Pillai is a SRK/Kajol bhakt/fanboy

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Rangeelaa

@Rangeelaa

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#33

out of all the awards I find NA the least unfair, one or two weird winners is not gonna write out the whole award show. Even the Oscars have a few undeserving winners.

Filmfare has been a joke for awhile now, I think since the early 90s the started rigging,it became blatantly obvious in the late 90s

The most shocking for me was when Shahid didn't even get a critics awards for Kaimeny, Ranbir won for Ajab Prem -__-

Quote

Koiza

@-koiza-

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: Saraa.

Madhuri and weak 😆 Are you kidding me?

Not that she is a bad actress but infront of karisma she is extremely poor

Quote

sara rafeek

@Ooolalala

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: -koiza-

Not that she is a bad actress but infront of karisma she is extremely poor

Madz is a really good actress but yes karishma completely overshadowed her in DTPH. Overshadowing madz can be difficult but karishma did it. That shows that karishma was really good in DTPH. I think she deserved NA for DTPH.

She also deserved NA for zubeida.

Quote

263437

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#36

I cannot believe Arjun Rampal won a NA for Rock On.

Quote

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: Saraa.

Madz is a really good actress but yes karishma completely overshadowed her in DTPH. Overshadowing madz can be difficult but karishma did it. That shows that karishma was really good in DTPH. I think she deserved NA for DTPH.

She also deserved NA for zubeida.

Did I just read that? I am dying 😲

Karisma is great. She accomplished a lot in her career. She improved 10-fold from 1991-2001. Very impressive.

But this is MADHURI DIXIT we are comparing her to.

Karisma just about managed to almost match-up to the effortless brilliance of Madhuri in DTPH. Hats off to her for that. But let's not get carried away. "Completely overshadowed" is a colossal over-statement.

Besides, they barely had one scene together + 1 dance.

Quote

sara rafeek

@Ooolalala

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: Sridevil

Did I just read that? I am dying 😲

Karisma is great. She accomplished a lot in her career. She improved 10-fold from 1991-2001. Very impressive.
But this is MADHURI DIXIT we are comparing her to.
Karisma just about managed to almost match-up to the effortless brilliance of Madhuri in DTPH. Hats off to her for that. But let's not get carried away. "Completely overshadowed" is a colossal over-statement.
Besides, they barely had one scene together + 1 dance.

Madhuri is really good actress but karishma is no less. DTPH was more of Karishma SRK movie. Karishma was really really good in that movie.

I love madz, Anjaam, hahk ect are enough to prove how good she is but karishma is really good too. And yes DTPH was karishma show,