Originally posted by: AnjaliPunia
ok i should finally tell what i had thought was
1. All that r8 and wrong was nowhere in reference to the ongoing scene rather it was narrators dileemma about the way story wiill shape from now .post nikhumbh and yamini each getging to see a emotional side of each other.
2.Raghvendra entry was at a wrong tym .nikhumbh scooter burnt he was having an emotional conflict yamini just saw a glimpse of it not fully .nikhumbh had dwelled deeper to yamini inner world .both shud have been however equal on understanding each othr
3. Then finally the initial guess i made i already told u that before Nikhumbh has been deliberately shwn or said by narrator as wrong bcz acc to narrator he had no r8 to spk fr yamini hwever i nvr see him spking fr yamini rather i saw him tryng to spk fr himself[B][/B]
1) The right and wrong part, I feel stemmed from his point about Yamini. And yes that leads into telling the audience which position this story takes on the matter, and cements the fact that this will be one of the themes of this story. One of the big points of this story is how this masoom, sehmi rajkumari will find herself, and a big part of that is getting out of the cage overseen by her father.
2) I don't think it was at a wrong time. And I don't think the understanding has been not been equal. (Actually one thing I was glad for is that Raghvendra only came after the sorry. I was a bit worried that his sorry would be interrupted. Instead, we got the sorry and both of them start a new phase in their 'relationship' so to speak.)
Yamini I think got a good glimpse of Nikumbh. In some ways Yamini may have gotten a deeper glimpse, because after the scooter burnt Nikumbh told her about the scooter's connection with his father. She learnt straight up from him regarding the conflicts he had with his father. Whereas with Yamini, she never outright said it. She started talking about herself regarding parents loving you even if they are wrong, but she still didn't speak of it personally. Though yes, Nikumbh did witness her dynamic with her father and he has probably connected some dots.
Also, there's the Galiyan montage. Where Nikumbh relates a story or stories of his father to Yamini. We only are privy to the beginning and when he's interrupted by the radio. But as the song plays we see the scenes of him animatedly telling her while she listens, watches him and laughs.
3) I would think that Narrator feels it's not Nikumbh's place to have said anything between Yamini and her father except that I feel it's contradictory to what Narrator says otherwise, as I have already outlined. I do think Nikumbh spoke up somewhat only because he saw Yamini getting scolded. But he didn't do it in any way that was trying to butt in. He was part of the situation, If Nikumbh had kept his mouth shut completely--lol, I'm sure he would've been criticized for not trying to clarify the situation.
Another thing is if it's not Nikumbh's place then why encourage the future where Nikumbh plans to help Yamini rid the fear in her heart? If he shouldn't have spoken up at all and should've kept quiet between father and daughter, then who is Nikumbh to come in and try to remove the fear in Yamini's heart. Raghvendra I'm sure will hate it. So who is Nikumbh to plan mischievously and free Yamini? Isn't that coming in between father and daughter?😆
*****************************************************************************
There is a far more simple explanation for the line I am peeved with-- I just never mentioned it even though it's been on my mind from the start. It's that during the writing stage they felt they had to include all three characters. Narrator points out a wrong in Raghvendra, Nikumbh and Yamin. Problem is the way the scene played out, there was nothing wrong in how Nikumbh reacted or behaved here.
There's a phrase: False equivalence in the name of balance--which is what I think happened here.
Edited by KhatamKahani - 11 years ago
Current Affairs
Sports
Bade Achhe Lagte Hain
