I would not say "of course ajab". let me just say that I am disappointed in phool. I thought she would care for ajab's friendship even if she was spoilt. But no she turned out to be not caring for friendship. Given that ajab sacrificed her feelings for phool and for unity of rajputs phool should at least have acted a bit more large hearted. but no she turned out to be self centred and haughty. In telling ajab to go from Mewar she really fell in the eyes of the viewers.
When pratap / ajab's love was set aside for the sake of unity one thought that phool would at least care for her friend and unite them. But such a pity she turned out to be selfish and arrogant. after all knowing pratap loves ajab and not her what use would it be for her to be marrying pratap knowing he is marrying her /phool for the sake of fighting akbar?
in fact there should not be this question at all. phool versus ajab because phool kicked herself out of the "comparison" /competition by her selfish action . friendship meant nothing to her. her friendship with ajab was superficial. in calling ajab samant ki putri she lowered herself. in the eyes of the viewers.
whether ajab is nice or not that is beside the point. if not for ajab's friendship at least if phool loved pratap truly she would have cared for his feelings at least. only people who show magnanimity go down in history as great people. phool is not one of them.
now phool/ajab/pratap are not even "friends"