Originally posted by: gunita_03
Well pari has no right to be mad because she should understand that Ankita wasn't born with a sliver spoon in her mouth like Pari. Ankita needed the money to support her siblings who don't have a mother and have a drunk father. Plus it's not like she took the money to harm Naren, she did her best to bring him back to his normal life. So I really can't understand what her problem is. And Pari just used Shekhar all this time, first for her family and Aaji and then to get away from Naren. She shouldn't be mad at ankita because if she was so good then regardless of hat Ankita and Naren did with their lifes she should of married Shekhar.
Agree with the last part, it's been made clear that ankita used naren for money for her siblings, that she has to go to an extreme length just to put food on the table. It was a contract, which Pari doesn't seem to understand. Ankita didn't steal any money from naren, she only took that which was her reward for making naren better, and she took her responsibility very seriously and also fullfilled it.
What's the problem in that? Didn't that contract make life so much more easier for pari because Pari can finally be with naren without a loyal wife in the picture? Shouldn't she be happy that ankita made such a contract? Shouldn't she be happy that it is because of ankita that she is now happy?
And yes ankita did not make the contract but isn't it clear to Pari from the contract that ankita respects the decisions of a 'normal' naren? That a 'normal' naren might not want to be with a wife that he didn't even know that he married?
In fact the contract makes ALOT of sense from all angles, I don't understand where betrayal comes into it?
It was always made abundantly clear that naren would only be normal if ahana came back into his life, so doesn't the contract show that to Pari? That ankita is actually using the contract to step aside for Pari and naren? And that according to the contract, if naren didn't ever recover, ankita would have spent a lifetime looking after him? The contract shows no greed from ankita in it whatsoever, if she was that greedy, there would have been a clause in the contract stating that she will only spend a certain amount of years looking after naren, say two or three years until she herself wants to move on. But no, she sacrificed her entire life just for her siblings, doesn't that in fact SHOW her loyalty?
Pari wasn't there during the hardest part of naren's life, Ankita basically took a mentally unstable naren, made him normal again and handed him over to Pari, pari should be thankful for whatever ankita has done for her, made pari's life so much more easier.
And you're right, how is Pari any different to ankita? She used shekhar countless times for her own good.
That would also have been like a contract marriage because it would have been based on understanding rather than love. Countless times she told him that she would marry him and then never fulfilled her promise.
Difference is that shekhar loves Pari and yet Pari still used him and his emotions, whereas naren does not love ankita, despite her love for him, she let him free. Shouldn't Pari be thankful to ankita for not only making him better but also setting him free from their bandhan so that Pari could finally have her happiness with naren?
Pari has proved to be a very bad and very disloyal best friend.
I hope cv's don't mess up her character more than they have already because apart from her not trusting ankita, I quite like Pari, she's a decent girl who thinks things through, I hope they show that side of her soon.