UNJUST VERDICT!!!!

J2lover

@J2lover

Dazzler

22

Posted: 11 years ago

#1

guyzz...just nw saw the episode...n i thought... that VERDICT GIVEN was not by SHEHESHAH...but a LOVE STUCK MAJNU!!!!!!😆😆...this was hoe AKBAR THE GREAT gave away decisions!!!!😆...be it be any era..its always said...JUSTICE IS DECLARED ON PRACTICALLY BASES...on FACTS N PROOFS...what happened here then...ALL LAWS FALL FLAT because SHEHENSHAH turns MAJNU!!!!!!!!🤣🤣 cut this crap!!!!🥱🥱...what in case of bakshi bano then...she too did it because of her MOHOBAT on cheapudin...n MA too did...( at least too some extent😆😆 ) due to her SO CALLED MOBOBAT ON JALAL..!!!!!!😕😕...soo why PUNISH THEM...🥱🥱 isn't totally UNJUST if we think PRACTICALLY...😕😕 in fact i think i this whole VERDICT thing...only JALAL'S DIL was speaking and BRAINS were on vaccation!!!!😆😆 ISN'T IT HILARIOUS GUYZZ...😆😆

15

Reply

Quote

Krishi

@knumnum

Rocker

26

Posted: 11 years ago

#2

Ohh Jalal's brains went on a lambhaaa vacation since the day he fell in love😆😆

4

Reply

Quote

Ashwini

@aashyagh

Rocker

27

Posted: 11 years ago

#3

Originally posted by: knumnum
Ohh Jalal's brains went on a lambhaaa vacation since the day he fell in love😆😆

We should also send our brains in vacation. This track is getting worse day by day😡😆

3

Reply

Quote

adiana12

@adiana12

Rocker

27

Posted: 11 years ago

#4

Everyone seems to be calling this pardon as an unjust verdict - I now have a Q for all - what would have been the correct or lets say Just verdict in this situation. The main points of the case are -

The ones brought to justice are 15 yrs and 20 yrs. at the most.

They have not committed any treason nor have they revolted (bhagawat)

They are both impulsive and immature.

As for the case - all do know the facts of this case. So what do people think would be the Just verdict for this case????

4

Reply

Quote

Sara

@smile.sara

Sparkler

33

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#5

jalal dil n dimagh cant work at the same time ... if one works other goes to hibernation sleep automatically

..

for judge...justice is blind ...for manju love is blind

...

but with in love with woman like jodha he now become useless brain less , spine less , courage less wounded by heart with no sence of justice and equality man

4

Reply

Quote

NutellaWaffle

@NutellaWaffle

Stunner

37

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#6

Yes unjust verdict started from ruks moorthikhand issue wer he ended the ruks matter privately in btw them without anyone knowing it and forgiving her... This is not new for us

2

Reply

Quote

FatedSoulMates

@FatedSoulMates

Dazzler

23

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#7

😆 Now we should send our brains on vacation and watch this show. 🤣

Also this Jalaluddin Muhammad is EKs fictional patnivrata character lets not bring the real Akbar anywhere in comparison with him. 😆

4

Reply

Quote

adiana12

@adiana12

Rocker

27

Posted: 11 years ago

#8

Lets all call a spade a spade - and call this pardon what it actually is - a populist decision - only EK has couched it in sugar syrup!!!! 😉😆

2

Reply

Quote

Sara

@smile.sara

Sparkler

33

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#9

Originally posted by: adianasr
Everyone seems to be calling this pardon as an unjust verdict - I now have a Q for all - what would have been the correct or lets say Just verdict in this situation. The main points of the case are -

The ones brought to justice are 15 yrs and 20 yrs. at the most.

They have not committed any treason nor have they revolted (bhagawat)

They are both impulsive and immature.

As for the case - all do know the facts of this case. So what do people think would be the Just verdict for this case????

.

addi ..I have really not an issue with verdict but the grace of emperor and the feel/reson of justice from his verdict/bhashan was missing ...😕

Edited by smile.sara - 11 years ago

7

Reply

Quote

Krishi

@knumnum

Rocker

26

Posted: 11 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: adianasr
Everyone seems to be calling this pardon as an unjust verdict - I now have a Q for all - what would have been the correct or lets say Just verdict in this situation. The main points of the case are -
The ones brought to justice are 15 yrs and 20 yrs. at the most.
They have not committed any treason nor have they revolted (bhagawat)
They are both impulsive and immature.

As for the case - all do know the facts of this case. So what do people think would be the Just verdict for this case????

Ads, I am not against his judgement or pardoning the couple. As u rightly pointed out, they are mere kids. btw wat was the minimum age tat Jalal said in his law during the tasneem's track?

Since they are mere kids, dnt u think Bharmal/Maina shd have a say in this as they are her parents. I know he has passed the judgement as a king. But I feel he shd hv asked for her parents' consent as well.

I agree tat as a king, u can either punish them or release them. But their marriage doesn't come under his jurisdiction. Remember, he said the same during Mazhar case, he cannot marry them as its their personal issue.

So how cud Jalal decide by himself that they can marry each other? Even though he didnt admit openly, we all know that part of the reason y he passed this judgement is cos she s Jodha's family. Now, wat if Jodha was how we thot to be (even though she is not😆) and got even more madder at him for getting them married?

6

Reply

Quote

UNJUST VERDICT!!!!

Related Topics

Explore Topics