Draupadi's Silence is Her Approval !!?

chirpy_life19 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#1

Well Vyasa doesn't interpret any scene or judge a character in Mahabharat,we have to exercise our brain to gain a better understanding.Here is the famous character of Mahabahrat - Draupadi,a person who is very difficult to understand.

We see Draupadi as a fearless woman with a powerful speech.

Occassion 1 - Remember what she said loudly to Karna during her swayamvar amidst the assemblage of hundreds of Kings...'I will not select a Suta for my lord.'

Occassion 2 - After 12 years of exile and having married Subhadra,Arjun reached Draupadi's place.Here Vyasa narrates that Draupadi, from jealousy, spoke unto him, saying, 'Why tarriest thou here, O son of Kunti? Go where the daughter of the Satwata race is! A second tie always relaxeth the first one upon a faggot!'

Occassion 3 - Yuddhistir lost everything during the dice game.

Pratikamin was ordered to bring Draupadi to the Dice Hall.When he narrated all that happened in Dice Hall her reply was..."What prince is there who playeth staking his wife? The king was certainly intoxicated with dice. Else, could he not find any other object to stake?Go, and ask that gambler present in the assembly, whom he hath lost first, himself, or me."

When Draupadi was dragged into the dice hall remember what she said..."Thou draggest me who am in my season before these Kuru heroes. This is truly an unworthy act. But no one here rebuketh thee. Assuredly, all these are of the same mind with thee. O fie! Truly hath the virtue of the Bharata gone! "👏

"Wait a little, thou worst of men, thou wicked-minded Dussasana. I have an act to perform--a high duty that hath not been performed by me yet. Dragged forcibly by this wretch's strong arms, I was deprived of my senses. I salute these reverend seniors in this assembly of the Kurus. That I could not do this before cannot be my fault."👏

Occassion 4 - When Krishna,Balaram and other Yadava Kings visited Pandavas in the forest at the beginning of their exile.

Draupadi said to Krishna,"I blame the Pandavas who are mighty and foremost in battle, for they saw (without stirring) their own wedded wife known over all the world, treated with such cruelty! Oh, fie on the might of Bhimasena, fie on the Gandiva of Arjuna, for they, O Janardana, both suffered me to be thus disgraced by little men!"

"'Husbands, or sons, or friends, or brothers, or father, have I none! Nor have I thee, O thou slayer of Madhu, for ye all, beholding me treated so cruelly by inferior foes, sit still unmoved! My grief at Karna's ridicule is incapable of being assuaged!"

Occassion 5 - When Yuddhishtir showered his kindness on Jayadhrath,Draupadi was greatly excited and said to her two husbands, Bhima and Arjuna, "If you care to do what is agreeable to me, you must slay that mean and despicable wretch, that sinful, foolish, infamous and contemptible chief of the Saindhava clan! That foe who forcibly carries away a wife, and he that wrests a kingdom, should never be forgiven on the battle-field, even though he should supplicate for mercy!"

Occassion 6 - After Keechak insulted her,she visited Bhima and said,"Arise, arise! Why dost thou, O Bhimasena, lie down as one dead? Surely, he that is not dead, never suffereth a wicked wretch that hath disgraced his wife, to live."

Occassion 7 - When Krishna was about to leave on a peace mission she strongly expresses her displeasure.She pours out her grief and tries to motivate everyone present over there.

So from these examples whe can confirm that Draupadi strongly expressed her dissatisfaction,she forced out her sorrows and conveyed her heart-broken state very well!

But...

There were occassions when she maintained silence...deadly silence!

Occassion 1 - Following her swayamvar,Draupadi left to the potter's abode with the Pandavas.Here Kunti gives a shock by saying "Enjoy ye all what ye have obtained." But Draupadi doesn't utter a single word!?

It was decided that she'll be the common wife of all the Pandavas...yet we find her silent,completely silent!She doesn't speak a single word!😲

She doesn't say anything even when her father Drupad and Sage Vyasa decide her strange marriage with five men.Draupadi who had spoken in her swayamvara with such decisiveness, such finality in her words that she shall not wed a soota, is utterly, completely silent here!

Does this silence mark her approval for having all the 5 Pandavas as her husbands!?Does this silence convey her like and interest in marrying 5 men!?

Occassion 2 - Vidura takes Dhritarashtra's invitation to Indraprastha inviting Yuddhishtir for the Dice Game.Before Yudhishthira's trip to Hastinapura from his capital Indraprastha for the game of dice,Draupadi didn't have anything to say to him!?She was aware,fully aware of Dhritarashtra's sons' wicked ways!We find her describing all that in length to Krishna when the later visited her with his brother Balaram and other Yadava Kings at the beginning of their 12 year exile.Read the following...

Draupadi said "O slayer of Madhu, who formerly drove the guileless Pandavas with their mother from the kingdom, while they were children still engaged in study and the observance of their vows. It is that sinful wretch, who, horrible to relate, mixed in Bhima's food fresh and virulent poison in full dose. But, O Janardana, Bhima digested that poison with the food, without sustaining any injury, for, O best of men and mighty-armed one, Bhima's days had not been ended! O Krishna, it is Duryodhana who at the house standing by the banyan called Pramana bound Bhima sleeping unsuspectingly, and casting him into the Ganges returned to the city. But the powerful Bhimasena the son of Kunti, possessed of mighty arms, on waking from sleep, tore his bonds and rose from the water. It is Duryodhana, who caused venomous black-cobras to bite all over the body of Bhimasena, but that slayer of foes died not. Awaking, the son of Kunti smashed all the serpents and with his left hand killed the favourite charioteer of Duryodhana. Again, while the children were asleep at Varanavata with their mother, it is he who set fire to the house intending to burn them to death. Who is there capable of doing such an act? It was then that the illustrious Kunti, overtaken by this calamity, and surrounded by the flames, began to cry out in terror, speaking to the children, 'Alas, I am undone! How shall we escape from this fire today! Alas, I shall meet with destruction with my little children!' Then Bhima, possessed of mighty arms, and prowess like unto the force of the wind, comforted his illustrious mother as also his brothers, saying, 'Like that king of birds, Garuda, the son of Vinata, I will spring up into the air. We have no fear from this fire'. And then taking his mother on his left flank, and the king in his right, and the twins on each shoulder, and Vivatsu on his back, the mighty Vrikodara, thus taking all of them, at one leap cleared the fire and delivered his mother and brother from the conflagration."

All this was described by Draupadi though she wasn't present during those occassions and certainly she was aware that Kauravas caused great sorrow for Pandavas and Kunti previously.Then why don't we find her advising Yuddhishtir helping him to recollect what has happened when they were leaving to Hastinapur!?What is her silence conveying here!?

Occassion 3

Dhritrashtra's sons lost in their fight with Gandharvas.Yuddhishtir was present near that lake with Draupadi performing the diurnal sacrifice called Rajarshi.Seeing the plight of Kauravas and their women Duryodhan's followers plead Yuddhishtir to come for their aid.This incidence took place after during the 12 years exile after dice game and Draupadi's insult.

Yuddhishtir commanded Bheem & Arjun to save Duryodhan and brothers as he was unable to leave the sacrifice place.He also said to an angry Bheem "This is not time for cruel words!Even an ordinary Kashatriya, would to the height of his power, protect one that hath come hither for refuge!"
The same Draupadi who was unhappy with Yuddhishtir's kindness and Krishna's peace mission in the later chapters doesn't utter a single word here!?😲

The probable reason we can find behind her silence in this occassion is her desire to see Kauravas vanquished by her men,Pandavas.If some Gandharva destroyed Duryodhan and his Brothers how would Bheem's pledges come true!?How can she attain peace!?

We don't find Draupadi as a victim of Kunti's unmindful words!Considering the incidents above it is right that she was very much interested in marrying all the Pandavas.Presumably she desired to marry 5 men,because of the impact of her previous boon.Here her silence like the above incident is conveying her approval!

We have seen that Draupadi doesn't allow things to happen against her interests especially when the situation is in her hand but what kept her numb when their departure for Hastinapur was decided!?😕

Did she want Yuddhishtir and other Pandava brothers to take revenge on Kauravas (for what they had done to them in their early years) by snatching their Kingdoms & wealth through the Dice Game!? or anything else you think to be a fitting reason here...!???😊

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

2.8k

Users

7

Likes

35

Frequent Posters

Wistfulness thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
This is such an awesome post! 👏
Indeed her character is tough to analyse, especially when her silence during the listed events haunts an individual's mind, in contrast with the occasions she roared as per her most famous character traits. I do believe that silence isn't an approval always, but her case differs here as she didn't chose to linger in silence on some of the most critical events. So her being silent on a few occasions is quite debatable.
Stalwart. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#3

I had this doubt long ago,'why Draupadi remained silent when Pandavs wanted to marry her.'Now I get it.Thanks for this beautiful post you have analysed in-depth! This itself explains everything.

And yeah as Member -Shruti said her being silent on a few occasions is quite debatable!
Edited by Stalwart. - 11 years ago
CaptainSpark thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
She was also silent when her sons died. As far as I know, she didn't say anything. Please correct me if I am wrong though. Anyways, I think she was silent because she knew in some cases, speaking will not help. Maybe she understood that her life ITSELF is not for someone's pleasure. She was born because her father seemed revenge. She wasn't a normal daughter on whose birth her father was delighted for HER SAKE. Draupadi was a very intelligent woman. She must have understood the depth of Kunti's words, and the situation so she did not say a word. No woman can agree to such a situation. I don't agree. And what could she have said? She had nothing to say. Can a woman say anything in such a situation? What does she say when she is born? Nothing. Sometimes it's hard to express yourself. She SPOKE to stop Karna maybe because she wanted a different future of herself. So, she had her say. In Subhadra incident, she has her say because she had the right to be angry with Arjun! Maybe she felt her right on her husband. (Same with Bheems Keechak incident I feel). And finally cheerharan, if a woman would keep quiet in that situation, after bearing so much, then the woman definitely has no point of view. She is dependent.Draupadi is none of these. So, I don't think silence meant approval for Draupadi.
Edited by Brishti_Sarkar - 11 years ago
bheegi thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Wonderful post!

Draupadi is indeed an intriguing character. I'm not sure what to make her of silence after the Swaymvar.

Could it be that the author himself didn't want to reveal how she actually felt as this was predestined because of her previous boon?

or after being vocal about the sootputra comment, did she accept her fate and chose to remain silent?

I've to believe that Yudi's last statement about Draupadi (that she loved Arjun more) does reflect her reluctance to marry all five brothers (at some point)

We can only conjecture...
chirpy_life19 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Brishti_Sarkar

She was also silent when her sons died. As far as I know, she didn't say anything. Please correct me if I am wrong though.


No,she indeed spoke this way - "By good luck, O monarch, having obtained the whole earth, thou shalt enjoy her after the slaughter of thy brave sons in the observance of kshatriya duties. By good luck, O son of Pritha, thou art happy at the thought of having obtained the whole earth. By good luck, thy thoughts do not dwell on Subhadra's son whose tread resembled that of an infuriated elephant. By good luck, thou dost not, like myself while residing at Upaplavya, recollect thy heroic sons slaughtered in the observance of kshatriya duties. O son of Pritha, hearing of the slaughter of those sleeping heroes by Drona's son of sinful deeds, grief burns me as if I were in the midst of a fire. If Drona's son be not made to reap the fruit of that sinful deed of his, if, putting forth your prowess in battle, thou dost not take the life of that wretch of sinful deeds, along with the lives of all his followers, then listen to me, ye Pandavas, I shall sit here in praya!"

"I have heard that Drona's son hath a gem on his head, born with him. I shall see that gem brought to me after the slaughter of that wretch in battle, Placing that gem on thy head, O king, I shall endure to live. Even this is my resolve."

"Remembering the duties of a kshatriya, O Bhima, it behoveth thee to come to my rescue. Slay that man of sinful deeds like Maghavat slaying Samvara. There is no one in this world who is equal to thee in prowess. It is known throughout the world how on an occasion of great calamity thou becamest at the town Varanavata the refuge of all the Parthas. When again we were seen by Hidimba, it was thou that becamest our refuge in the same way. Like Maghavat rescuing (his spouse) the daughter of Puloma, thou didst rescue my afflicted self, in Virata's city, from a great calamity. Like those great feats, O Partha, that thou didst achieve in former days, slay now, O slayer of foes, the son of Drona and be thou happy!"

You can read it here.

Edited by Cool-n-Fresh - 11 years ago
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7
Interesting post...
Draupadi's character is indeed the most enigmatic, after Lord Krishna...
She was indeed very vocal, n straight-forward...
She stopped Karna, bcoz she wanted a different life. She questioned the elders , bcoz she was dragged in a horrible state.
Even in the case of Jaydrath n Keechak, she spoke up, bcoz they directly harmed her.
After her sons were killed, she spoke up bcoz Ashwathama killed them like a coward, in a horrible way.
Thus, she spoke up mainly, when she was affected directly.
As for not stopping Yudisthir, well, actually nobody anticipated that a mere dice-game would turn into a public molestation.
So, it's not right to blame her for that.
During the Gandharva war, I don't think she needed to talk.
Bcoz, it was an issue related to war, n she, being a woman, probably, thought of staying away.
Or, maybe, the explanation, u gave, is the right one.
As for the Kurukshetra war, she expressed her opinion, bcoz, somewhere the war was related to her. Her humiliation was too much for to take, which is y she wanted her husbands to wage war.
The only case, where her silence seems to be strange is when she got divided between 5 men.
Now, there could be many explanations.
Either, she realized the benefits of having 5 husband, n agreed willingly. Coz, polyandry was not really unimaginable then.
Or, she probably did protest. But Ved Vyas conveniently edited her protest, n made it look like she gladly accepted it, so as to raise the Pandava-Panchali marriage to divine proportions.
Or, maybe, she realized that if she did not agree, then she would lose Arjun too.
Well, it could be any one of these reasons. However, I personally feel, that MAYBE, it was the third reason.
You see, just after Kunti said those words, Yudisthir asked Arjun to marry her first.
To this Arjun says, that he cannot marry before Yudisthir or Bhim.
Thus Arjun got ready to share his wife with his brothers, to respect his mother n unity among the brothers.So, with this one decision, Arjun made it clear that his brothers were more important to him than his wife.
Maybe, Draupadi, too realized that Arjun would never choose her over his brothers.
Maybe, she realized that, if she refused to this arrangement, then Arjun would refuse to marry her at all.
Maybe.
Clearly, she loved Arjun the most, which is mentioned in subtle hints, all throughout the epic.
So, maybe that is y she agreed.
After rejecting Karna, n then facing so much of drama at her Swamvar, if she had refused to marry the Pandavas too, then clearly she would have had no other option than to jump into fire like Amba.
Maybe she thought marrying the Pandavas was a better option than jumping into fire.
Well this is MY opinion.
bbbccc thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8
This version MB has made Draupadi bigger than ever, else really what is her feat without Krishna by her side at every step?
She was born(untraditionally) for a reason, she was why Mahabharat happened, Krishna just made her instrument to justify HIS existence on earth. There was no human left, the ones didn't have any power and something needed to happen, else our dharama was at risk..
She was no different than Gandhari, Kunti, Subhadra etc as woman, but what makes her stand out is Krishna by her side..
You wrote well, but I don't consider has extraordinary by her own
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
This version MB has made Draupadi bigger than ever, else really what is her feat without Krishna by her side at every step?
She was born(untraditionally) for a reason, she was why Mahabharat happened, Krishna just made her instrument to justify HIS existence on earth. There was no human left, the ones didn't have any power and something needed to happen, else our dharama was at risk..
She was no different than Gandhari, Kunti, Subhadra etc as woman, but what makes her stand out is Krishna by her side..
You wrote well, but I don't consider has extraordinary by her own
[/QUOTE
Well, Draupadi's extraordinariness depends on how u see her.
After all she was a woman, right?
And which women in those days did "extraordinary feats" like the ones done by Arjun, Karna n Bhishma?
She is considered great by many, bcoz, she kind of sowed the seeds of feminism in India.
At a time, when the society was patriarch n male-dominated (which it still is), n at a time, when women were expected to be submissive, n accept everything quietly, she spoke her mind, n wielded a strong influence on the people around her.
Maybe, this is very common for the women of 21st Century, but it was not so at 3000 B.C.
She was not flawless, but she was certainly different.
N, that is y she is remembered.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".