Originally posted by: thearcher
Oh my! I am not sure I can digest that even in this millennium. Guess the Dwapar Yug folks were a lot more liberal than I gave them credit for
Bigg Boss 20: Daily Discussion Thread- 6th Sept 2026- Premier Epi
🏏Women's Asia Cup 2026: Group A, M 10: BAN W vs SL W on 06/09/26🏏
Krishna's Silent Watch
JEEVAN SANGINI-Season 2
Originally posted by: thearcher
Oh my! I am not sure I can digest that even in this millennium. Guess the Dwapar Yug folks were a lot more liberal than I gave them credit for
Originally posted by: pyaaribehna
I have read mahabharat too. it said they shared her because kunti said so. it did not say druapadi stared at them. slept at their feet "peacefully" no body heard her "screams" etc etc. this is all new and enlightening. really !
Originally posted by: pyaaribehna
and on top of that someone says "five men" and "one "In laws"" guys this is kalyug and who wants to be the "patni" who does "seva" to her in laws? and be married to "five men" who would not be "jealous" of each other simply because they are brothers? and the rest of the stuff is about "energies" and mid thirties and forties and etc etc. disgusting.
to think mahabharata trigges such feelings in people. they live in kalyug and think of having five men and then they think very piously of having "one in law pair" and "serving" them easily.this is kalyug and "in laws" are considered "baggage" if it makes you happy have five men. I don't think anybody would have five kids that too all men. so I don't think one would be lucky on that score. may be two men if you are lucky three men. in one house. definitely not five men. those days are gone.
Originally posted by: srishtisingh
good one diala! if their bonding is strong and I donot have to care for jealousy, its good choice 😉