My theory about polyandry practice in Ancient aryan Bharatbhoomi

milinda.shreyz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#1
I really have a strong belief that Polyandry was a recognised practice among early aryan settlers when women were real scarce in their clan.And they didnot want to mingle their blood with nor-aryan dwellers of the country.Maybe, having one common wife strengthened their bonds between the brothers and their children were known to be the members of their families and all the brothers were father figure to them.It decreased the possibility of fights within the family for property and quarrels amongst women folk.
At that time,the newly arrived aryans were continuously at war with the other powerful and more civilised non aryan races,struggling for existence , expansion and dominance over this rich fertile country.As the Aryans were traditionally herdsmen and hunters;they learnt the tricks of farming from the dravidians,unity and solidarity was their keyword of survival.Fights within their own family and clan was the last thing the wanted.
Moreover, although it sounds rather strange from today's perspective but one women in a family of 4 / 5 brothers gave that woman enormous power in the family and supreme influence among the male folk of that family be it husbands or sons. She could reign ,say, like a Queen bee at her home. Maybe the families were matriarchal at that time, the custom of sons known by their mother's name were born at that period and went on even during Mahabharata days, although the significance lessened.All these were in norms in maybe Pre vedic era ??
Gradually civilisation advanced and along with it the male dominance over the earth and women.The vast Gangetic plains became aryan stronghold and educated aryans started to live in Rik ved induced ways leaving behind their primitive practices but sadly the status of women in the family greatly diminished.
Later the practice grew obsolete during Mahabharata days when number of women significantly increased enough for men to take numerous wives. But it was not unheard of ,may be slightly looked down upon if not backed by powerful paternal home and influential husbands. The practice however faded out with the flow of time and advancement of civilization but language of the race which holds strong historical evidences still bears the evidence stealthily.
why else a brother in law would be called devara (second husband/younger husband) in sanskrit and hence in all north indian languages born out of sanskrit. Are there any Indo-European Aryan language in the world that cites similar example ? Idont dont have the knowledge.If anyone knows, plz let me know too.
Edited by shreya_rc - 12 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

3.4k

Users

3

Likes

7

Frequent Posters

milinda.shreyz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
plz share ur views.all kind of opinions are greatly welcome😃
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#3
Ok i already posted this somewhere.In our history book, Polyandry during Mahabharat Period has been explained, actually.


The paternal estate was to be divided only among sons with a special share for the Eldest. Girls had claim on only those things set for their dowry and were not to 'HOARD' family property or even their own valuables without the permission of the Husband.

Condition of Women during the Mahabharat Period is described as in my History Part l :-

Negative in character and established gender hierarchy

Birth of Girl child was looked upon as evil and a curse, wedded couples performed yajnas and sacrifices to be honored with 'FINE SONS' by the gods.

The doors of 'Sabhasa' and 'Samitie', the representative assemblies were closed for Women except for a rare few cases.

Polygamy ( Men having multiple wives) was becoming a common practice, there were rules as to which Man of which caste could have how many wives of same or different(lower) castes.

but

Polyandry ( Women with Multiple husbands) and Sati was not in common practice, though it doesnt mean that it did not existed at all, mostly among Royal Females. Well, there is Madri and Draupadi for examples i guess.

Widow marriage was in Vogue and Niyog was obviously practiced.

Satvahanas were the only exception, women were given more respect among the, the name of the children were derived from mothers name. Eight kind of marriages were accepted but only the first 4 were considered 'good'. The last four were condemned.
One of the last four was when a girl married a Lover out of her own desire.😔 That will be love marriage.

Going more deep into Polyandry, gradually the practice fell into disfavor among the Brahmanas, but it was prevalent among the Ruling Elites, especially in the Himalayan Region. There was a shortage of girls (Obviously, since sons were preferred) which led to the practice of Polyandry among common people too, not just Ruling Class. Though, it was attributed to a situation of Crisis. While, Polygamy was more of a choice given to Men according to their caste, wealth and status in society. See, the major difference.

And, Women were considered possession, first. Property, by royal males. Not their own person. Unfortunately, Human Rights/Legal and Social Gender Identity was unheard of at that time, i assume.
milinda.shreyz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#4
Hi Medha,
see what I wrote is about how polyandry came into practice in pre rik vedic era when the aryans 1st strated to settle down in saptasindhu area, not during mahabharat age which was witten probably in later vedic period or after the rise of Mahajanapadas. If u r a history major or mythology buff, plz tell me if my conjectures are correct or not .
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#5
No, i am all for Lit. not history.
Yes, i was just posting about whatever i know of Polyandry but only during the Vedic Era.
Pre-Vedic era ... i dont know damn about it, i apologize.
Perhaps, Varaali or Vrish can help you with this.
Edited by medha00 - 12 years ago
milinda.shreyz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: medha00

No, i am all for Lit. not history.

Yes, i was just posting about whatever i know of Polyandry but only during the Vedic Era.
Pre-Vedic era ... i dont know damn about it, i apologize.
Perhaps, Varaali or Vrish can help you with this.

Oh, Itz fine. I am a lit major too but also hold a degree in Ancient World History 😃.thanks for ur reply😊
BarbieGurl thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
Polyandry is not an uncommon practice in ancient cultures.
Based on availability or scarcity or females society rules changed...
So there might hav been some points in history wen polyendry was practised and there's nothin immoral abt it.If men can hav mulitple wives why not woman?
woman have desires too.

The sati and all are actually middle age customs...in ancient culture there's hardly any examples of sati...it was rare and usually practised by old queens.
It became common after muslim attacks on india wen widows were in danger of being exploited by the kings.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".