Historical facts about Porus - Page 5

Tfs facts I dint know that anusuya and bamni are fiction characters. But some text it's mention porus lost battle to alexender, no texts anywhere is giving correct information every text has written different facts don't know now sid tiwari is following which one.

80 percent of the world accepts that Porus was defeated by Alexander. Had Dhanananda fought with Alexander he would win. But he refused

Originally posted by: darkwarrior200

80 percent of the world accepts that Porus was defeated by Alexander. Had Dhanananda fought with Alexander he would win. But he refused

Okay I'm liking this show but I feel they should have stuck to history and show Puru as being older to Alexander.

Originally posted by: --BlackSheep--

@FlauntPessimism,precisely.They couldn't have shown a middle aged protagonist fighting a younger and more attractive opponent.Moroever by selecting a young actor for Porus they would be able to attract the youth audience too.

By making both Porus and Alexander of the same age they got themselves two handsome and attractive faces to promote the show.Afterall nowadays jo dikhta hai wahi bikta hai😆😉

Moroever I guess this was also done because they wanted to show Porus and Alexander's journey parallely and this couldn't have been possible if Porus had been elder to Alex.

Yeah CGM was not exactly a kid.More like a teenager I guess when he worked for Alexander's army.

Like many chose to blive here tht indian serials cant show anything right. I gave them the same answer what I'll tell here - CHOICE

The people investing money in this serial the same way The movie Alexander's makers invested in theirs. They showed what they wanted to. Doesn't make them right just bcos they are from U.S 🤣
N i dont even have to say this. 80% of the world does choose to blive tht Alexander won and the discussion ends there only. Why he didn't conquer India if he won, His army abandoned him, what happened then, the inside stories, hardly anyone discusses that.

And you r talking about Bharatnatyam n kathakali shown ? Hell no one raised questions on how so many women were shown playing sitars in 350 BC

Regarding Laksh looking younger than Rohit. Well there is a 12 year age gap in reality.

Originally posted by: Luna99NB

Laksh looks younger than Rohit FYI😉

Looks younger??😲 He is 12 years younger to Rohit FYI😉😆

Originally posted by: darkwarrior200

Like many chose to blive here tht indian serials cant show anything right. I gave them the same answer what I'll tell here - CHOICE

The people investing money in this serial the same way The movie Alexander's makers invested in theirs. They showed what they wanted to. Doesn't make them right just bcos they are from U.S 🤣
N i dont even have to say this. 80% of the world does choose to blive tht Alexander won and the discussion ends there only. Why he didn't conquer India if he won, His army abandoned him, what happened then, the inside stories, hardly anyone discusses that.

And you r talking about Bharatnatyam n kathakali shown ? Hell no one raised questions on how so many women were shown playing sitars in 350 BC

Regarding Laksh looking younger than Rohit. Well there is a 12 year age gap in reality.

Its true his army did abandon him. They refused to fight more.
As for the 51% of what historians blive. 6/10 of them are in disputes regarding to what was historically correct n what was not. Here thats besides the point. But then just like a historian, a director/ producer is choosing to show what he believes is the right version. Atleast the prime facts.

Originally posted by: darkwarrior200

Its true his army did abandon him. They refused to fight more.
As for the 51% of what historians blive. 6/10 of them are in disputes regarding to what was historically correct n what was not. Here thats besides the point. But then just like a historian, a director/ producer is choosing to show what he believes is the right version. Atleast the prime facts.