Why did they... - Page 2

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

@sugar_21

Exactly! Pari asked her to be clear but Ankita just talked in circles. What is one supposed to do? Which story is true? Shes creating so much confusion. Even the letter isn't fully clear - its talking in circles.

Letter wasn't clear? Here's what the letter says (from Bhalla's update)

1.) I loved Naren, and I love him now too.
2.) The baby I'm carrying is the symbol of my love (=Naren)
3.) He and Pari love each other, and I will not break my sister's marriage.
4.) I don't blame him for anything.
5.) I don't want to be a burden on anyone, so I'm going away.

Seriously Soniyaa? How much more clear?

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Letter wasn't clear? Here's what the letter says (from Bhalla's update)

1.) I loved Naren, and I love him now too.
2.) The baby I'm carrying is the symbol of my love (=Naren)
3.) He and Pari love each other, and I will not break my sister's marriage.
4.) I don't blame him for anything.
5.) I don't want to be a burden on anyone, so I'm going away.

Seriously Soniyaa? How much more clear?

I suppose to us viewers it's absolutely clear.
And we know it's clear in the letter because of her using the words 'symbol of love'.
But I think it would have been better if she made it crystal, so people like Rushali can't twist her words or get their knickers in a twist.
We all know what ankita means when she says 'Naren isn't the father' she's trying to say that HER naren is the father, the old one, the one who showered her with love. But obviously that means nothing to Rushali and co, so ankita has to construct her sentences more carefully next time.
Why let anyone take your words and either misinterpret it totally or interpret it whatever way they like?
I mean just look at this forum. One sentence can be wildly interpreted in a hundred different ways.
I know Ankita does not want to force Naren to be a father, but she can always mention the paternity of the baby.
If no one believes her, if Naren screams and shouts at her or calls her a liar, then she always has proof of DNA.
I also don't understand how someone always manages to intercept a DNA report.

Naren jab plagal tha Dimag ache se chaltha hai tha ki mansi ki case bhi solve ki ,jab who normal hogaya uska Dimag Kaam karna hi bhulgaya

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

@sugar_21

Exactly! Pari asked her to be clear but Ankita just talked in circles. What is one supposed to do? Which story is true? Shes creating so much confusion. Even the letter isn't fully clear - its talking in circles.

I just wish she had been real about this thing since day 1 rather then be foolish. Why not just say:

"listen i married naren for money but fell in love with him. I wasn't aware Ahana was alive. I am pregnant now with Narens child. However as his Ahana is back and Naren wants to be with her, I will set him free. I want Naren to be happy. I will take care of this child myself & don't want to trouble anyone"

After that - let whoever make decisions for themselves but at least they would have acted based on truth rather than being misled.

It would have been great, had this been happened.

@ Nikita - I find it even stupider that Ankita won't clearly state the truth, in words, when she is clearly asked. Its not meant to be a guess the father game. She needs to speak up, that's all. There is no need to for these useless letters or stories. She just won't get to the point and that's the sole basis of so many episodes wasted.

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

@sugar_21

Exactly! Pari asked her to be clear but Ankita just talked in circles. What is one supposed to do? Which story is true? Shes creating so much confusion. Even the letter isn't fully clear - its talking in circles.

I just wish she had been real about this thing since day 1 rather then be foolish. Why not just say:

"listen i married naren for money but fell in love with him. I wasn't aware Ahana was alive. I am pregnant now with Narens child. However as his Ahana is back and Naren wants to be with her, I will set him free. I want Naren to be happy. I will take care of this child myself & don't want to trouble anyone"

After that - let whoever make decisions for themselves but at least they would have acted based on truth rather than being misled.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Letter wasn't clear? Here's what the letter says (from Bhalla's update)

1.) I loved Naren, and I love him now too.
2.) The baby I'm carrying is the symbol of my love (=Naren)
3.) He and Pari love each other, and I will not break my sister's marriage.
4.) I don't blame him for anything.
5.) I don't want to be a burden on anyone, so I'm going away.

Seriously Soniyaa? How much more clear?

Symbol of my love? What does that mean? Which love? She's said she loved shasank first and now Naren. This is talking in circles and without reason complicating and confusing the people in this situation. To the audience, this is clear - not to the character it seems still. Lets see how it unfolds.

Right! On the wedding day, she even mentioned some other "love" who became her world and use to make her feel special... us viewers know that she was referring to old Naren but how the hell will everyone else understand. He's the symbol of my love. how stupid. Just say that I love Naren and my baby is the symbol of OUR love. She purposely makes it confusing.

Originally posted by: Sugar_21

Right! On the wedding day, she even mentioned some other "love" who became her world and use to make her feel special... us viewers know that she was referring to old Naren but how the hell will everyone else understand. He's the symbol of my love. how stupid. Just say that I love Naren and my baby is the symbol of OUR love. She purposely makes it confusing.

So True!!
Ankita could've exactly done this. When Naren met her on station & told her to return with him to home there was a ray of hope in her eyes. She still had a hope of Naren returning back in her life. What exactly has she done or wants to do..Pari is being used up only for 'Naren sir's happiness.