Ovi Acceptance ! DT Note pg11 - Page 5

Purvi - did she commit the act of swapping the baby? Did she perform the act of swapping Ovi's dead baby? The answer is no, so the first element of crime is missing. Did she have the intention to swap the baby? It was her idea, the answer is yes. The second element is fulfilled? To prove the crime both elements need to be full field and proven, here in Purvi's case one element to prove the crime is missing, that is the act. So is there a prima facie case against Purvi? From my legal back ground the answer is No. Do Purvi need a defense here my answer is No.

Onir - did he commit the act of swapping the baby? Onir being in the medical profession he is aware that it is against his medical ethics to swap the baby. Yet he went ahead performed the act of swapping the dead baby. He committed the act of swapping and disposing off the dead baby, so the answer is Yes, the first element of crime is fulfilled. Did he have the intention to swap the baby? It was not his idea, even though it was not his idea he is aware that it is wrong and against his medical ethics to swap the baby. Onir performed the act with the intention of swapping the dead baby because he was aware of what he is doing and he also knows the consequences of it. The second element of crime is fulfilled. Both elements of crime exist and a prima facie case against Onir can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

As for argument of good intention is from laypeople and bear in mind here not all possess legal knowledge or from legal back ground. Without applying any legal knowledge I would also say whatever Purvi did was without any intention of malice.

Purvi - did she commit the act of swapping the baby? Did she perform the act of swapping Ovi's dead baby? The answer is no, so the first element of crime is missing. Did she have the intention to swap the baby? It was her idea, the answer is yes. The second element is fulfilled? To prove the crime both elements need to be full field and proven, here in Purvi's case one element to prove the crime is missing, that is the act. So is there a prima facie case against Purvi? From my legal back ground the answer is No. Do Purvi need a defense here my answer is No.

she did not swapped the baby by her hand but she forced to onir to do it by emotionally blackmailing and she is a educated girl mostly she handled ovt industry in every matter so she better knows about which illegal or which is legal...so her crime would be not ignore and one thing if the baby was onir and purvi's child then she could same act what she did ...the answer is no in this case she never donate her baby ,if she could gave ovi the child then she will be do infront of others...but here she hide so that no one will be know that she was pregnant before marriage which was against archana's sanskar...by the baby swapping and hiding about this her prority was pari will be get her real father's love without damage her image infront of family members...

in my background supari killer and master mind both r criminal...and also always police and law wanted to catch the master mind of game bcz he/she was main criminal...and also in theif case theif and theif leader both r criminal...so purvi did not do by her hand that not means she will be innocent ...she is also criminal......

Onir - did he commit the act of swapping the baby? Onir being in the medical profession he is aware that it is against his medical ethics to swap the baby. Yet he went ahead performed the act of swapping the dead baby. He committed the act of swapping and disposing off the dead baby, so the answer is Yes, the first element of crime is fulfilled. Did he have the intention to swap the baby? It was not his idea, even though it was not his idea he is aware that it is wrong and against his medical ethics to swap the baby. Onir performed the act with the intention of swapping the dead baby because he was aware of what he is doing and he also knows the consequences of it. The second element of crime is fulfilled. Both elements of crime exist and a prima facie case against Onir can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

yes onir also did crime by listening purvi's blackmailing...he is a strong ,loyal person he could handle purvi in strong way just like at kolkata when purvi forced him to come mumbai he did not came untill he himself not feel he should do it...but he failed to make understand purvi..and its true he tried to best to make understand purvi but stbbron purvi did not listen him and continue forced him and he melted due to his love towards purvi with heavy heart (bcz he considered pari is his own child )...any way he only punished badly for his only one crime also...and also learn from his mistake and never repeat again and smartly go away and return to his own world again......

As for argument of good intention is from laypeople and bear in mind here not all possess legal knowledge or from legal back ground. Without applying any legal knowledge I would also say whatever Purvi did was without any intention of malice.

she did without any intention of malice where she get time to think about it...she had only thought if truth will be come no one forgive her and her image will be damage and d clan will be broke all relationship with her if ovi will be hurt etc. etc. etc. where is her thought when onir told her ovi never be accept the child bcz child is her and arjun's ...so decided she will be give baby without knowledge of ovi ...so that her baby will be get her real fathers identity , ovi will be happy by staying in dark and arjun will be closed her by baby all wish about her child rights will be full..without knowledge of her wrong step o f before marriage ( its called a shortcut method .., just like people fallow for being more money but its never good for anyone)...if we can forgive purvi in baby swapping case by told she has no bad intention ...then also we should no problem by ovi's hiding about pia...bcz she also did without any malice...she hide it so that again no one force to arjun and ovi to stay with ovi and again arjun will be unhappy , she hide it so that arvi marriage will be held , she hide so that her family will be not face more problem ...she has also nobel intention...and most important things she did not swapped other baby ,its her baby and her right what she will be do with baby...she did not snatched other's motherly right about her dead baby ...