TATTOO OF MAA 5.3
Yami Gautam Vs Kriti Sanon Awards Controversy
DRUNKEN HOLI 6.3
Celebs At Wankhede Stadium
Neena Gupta Pregnancy Rumours
🏏 India Women tour of Australia 2026: Australia W vs India W Test🏏
🏏 T20 World Cup 2026: Celebration thread 4 Ind's win against Eng SF🏏
Anpi Prayansh Aransh FF - Swapnakoodu
Originally posted by: rash2222
what do you mean prematurely grey or wrinkles... ankita is not in forties... she is in her twenties... and i have often seen people in the forum saying she looks younger than her daughters... you are been reported
Originally posted by: majoni03
ankita also played mother to ppl who looks older than her. then charlie is toh just playing her sister.
Originally posted by: sharadrocks
That is a matter of perception. I don't think any of the younger crop look older than her! They do not look young enough to be her children certainly but definitely not older than her!Anyway, whatever floats your boat! I think it will be ridiculous to show Ankita as younger or even the same age as Charlie. But then again, that is my opinion! Both of us are naturally entitled to ours!
Originally posted by: rash2222
what do you mean prematurely grey or wrinkles... ankita is not in forties... she is in her twenties... and i have often seen people in the forum saying she looks younger than her daughters... you are been reported
Originally posted by: miklyway
mrinalini is older than ankita. still she was looking younger. so obviously now ankita will also look younger than charlie. among all the crap of arjun and purvi u decided to open a topic on the looks of charlie and ankita. thats so sickening.
Originally posted by: sharadrocks
I completely respect Ekta's right to cast Ankita in a younger role! Just like she has done with Sakshi Tanwar! But instead of this ridiculous storyline and casting, why couldn't she have just done a PR 2? Create a plausible storyline intended to showcase Ankita's talents? Even Ankita's interests would have been served better rather than this ridiculousness!