Originally posted by: tejaswiniwenham
ty waneeka for saying this. there were people who rejoiced when ovi's baby didn't make it. in fact there was a post today lamenting ekta's treatment of miscarriages. even in that the tm somehow justified ovi's stillborn which was 'needed to create drama'. saying that purvi's miscarriage is celebrated is a gross generalisation of an entire fan base which is unfair. im a ovi fan and for the most part i disliked purvi's nature but i made an entire post saying that her miscarriage is just unfair and callous on the cvs' part. they handled the pre-leap story awfully.
@bold...I think this is an extremely unfortunate interpretation given to my words...it is my post that you refer to...
Killing Ovi's baby was tragic but there is the argument that it provided the basis for drama! With a twenty year leap around the corner, why this pregnancy and why a miscarriage if any? What drama will it yield twenty years later?
I have quoted my lines from my post...
I have clearly stated that it was uncalled for...but the fact remains that much of what happened subsequently was based on that loss.. meaning that it became the basis for drama...I merely stated what was shown...which part of my statement seems to justify what was shown...when I categorically said it was tragic...
I understand where you are coming from...although I have seen none, there may have been posts made to the effect that you mention...however please do not include mine among them...that is completely unwarranted and untrue...
To me babies are babies...irrespective of their parents...and irrespective of their legitimacy...they have no control over either!
Edited by sharadrocks - 11 years ago