Originally posted by: ilovedhanjanird
Ovi asking purvi why she didn't abort the child was a very practical question
If you know you are carrying a married mans childUnless you've any intention of interfering in the marriage why would you keep the child😕Now Ovi's situation of the stillborn doesn't compare to Paris situationShe was carrying her husbands child and there were no lies related to itPurvi claimed she left so ovi could have a happy married lifeBut her presence itself made everything worse
Excuse me? he wasn't married then he was single. So that question is absurd and selfish.