What was need to hire a detective?Warning Pg14&16 - Page 10

Originally posted by: ilovedhanjanird

You like arvi fine
But don't defend this action based on your personal liking for the couple on moral grounds
A third person interfering in a marriage by hiring a detective can never be right
Had it been Ovi to hire someone to check up on Arjun would be equally wrong if not more
Why can't Arjun just mind his own business and concentrate where he should
He is getting on my nerves now
What's wrong with him
A person can make a mistake one , twice , trice but repeating it
OMG 🤢

I dont understand what you mean by a third person interfering in onir and purvi marriage. I would assume you mean the detective that arjun hire is interfering in the marriage. Based on this assumption, I can tell you that the detective has not interfered nor has arjun. As the detective has been hired by arjun and whatever they are both doing is in the background. If they were involving Onir or purvi directly into what they are doing, then I would say interfering.

Arjun is doing what he thinks is correct for his daughter pari as she is with Onir and purvi. She is part of their marriage and any thing goes wrong there his daughter would be directly affected.

Originally posted by: Sakhile

Purvi is an orphan. That is not a lie. Yes she was raised by Archana. That does not take away the fact that both her parents died in the accident. Anyway everyone always reminds her that she is "sadhak sai utaihi"> So she did not lie about that.

Originally posted by: TALIRAlinda

he is fulfilling his jiju responsibility as we are now living in 21st century .you know 21ST CENTURY , sali more important than wife in this 21st century 😆 😉

Originally posted by: Sakhile

Purvi is an orphan. That is not a lie. Yes she was raised by Archana. That does not take away the fact that both her parents died in the accident. Anyway everyone always reminds her that she is "sadhak sai utaihi"> So she did not lie about that.

Don't use semantics, we know what she meant when she said she had no one. Not even Archana could find her, because she was hiding from her. There must be a limit to defending Purvi,, don't start lying yourself. You are not debating with an idiot, so don't try to twist words, it only makes your debate ridiculous along with those that click the like button with you.

Originally posted by: hillydee

Don't use semantics, we know what she meant when she said she had no one. Not even Archana could find her, because she was hiding from her. There must be a limit to defending Purvi,, don't start lying yourself. You are not debating with an idiot, so don't try to twist words, it only makes your debate ridiculous along with those that click the like button with you.

Since this is a forum in which we write, words are important. The words we use convey our message. The tone of those words convey our feelings. When I accept that Purvi is an orphan, I am not lying to myself or anyone else. She is an orphan. As to the phrase, "She doesn't have anyone" that is a very different issue altogether. Yes she had her adoptive mother and the rest of the D and K clans. However the post you take exception to only dealt with the issue of whether she was lying when she called herself an orphan. I maintain that she is an orphan and therefore was not lying.

When Ovi hired a detective to spy on arjun..some says she should not do that and criticized and bashed.
Now when arjun hired a detective to spy on onir..they said he is doing the right thing.

lol.

Both cases are same..having doubt on the person.

See how quick people can change.

Originally posted by: Sakhile

Since this is a forum in which we write, words are important. The words we use convey our message. The tone of those words convey our feelings. When I accept that Purvi is an orphan, I am not lying to myself or anyone else. She is an orphan. As to the phrase, "She doesn't have anyone" that is a very different issue altogether. Yes she had her adoptive mother and the rest of the D and K clans. However the post you take exception to only dealt with the issue of whether she was lying when she called herself an orphan. I maintain that she is an orphan and therefore was not lying.

You may support whomsoever you wish. Those are your rights. I have the same right and will exercise it.

I will not react to your personal attack on me and those who press the like button. That's my choice.

Originally posted by: Sakhile

Since this is a forum in which we write, words are important. The words we use convey our message. The tone of those words convey our feelings. When I accept that Purvi is an orphan, I am not lying to myself or anyone else. She is an orphan. As to the phrase, "She doesn't have anyone" that is a very different issue altogether. Yes she had her adoptive mother and the rest of the D and K clans. However the post you take exception to only dealt with the issue of whether she was lying when she called herself an orphan. I maintain that she is an orphan and therefore was not lying.

You may support whomsoever you wish. Those are your rights. I have the same right and will exercise it.

I will not react to your personal attack on me and those who press the like button. That's my choice.

Originally posted by: hillydee

Don't use semantics, we know what she meant when she said she had no one. Not even Archana could find her, because she was hiding from her. There must be a limit to defending Purvi,, don't start lying yourself. You are not debating with an idiot, so don't try to twist words, it only makes your debate ridiculous along with those that click the like button with you.

I am sorry but your tone is really not a great one and also please be careful in your comments as I see it as a personal attack on my integrity as i am one of those persons that click the like button. If you wish to make a point about the story, its fine but dont get too emotional and attack members who tend to disagree with you.

Lastly, I only base my arguments on what are facts in PR and not what I think I saw. If purvi said she is an orphan, she is according to the definition that I know an orphan to mean. Had she said she had parents then she would be lying as both her parents died. I would agree if you say she should have told Onir further that she is an orphan but was adopted by...

But why should she not lie to Onir when he himself is no saint😕