Posted:
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
It all boils down to is whether a person ought to be called a criminal if he is not a seasoned one .
Well Varsha did not do any crime prior to the kidnapping . She can make the argument of 'good intentions' and 'not being basically a person who resorts gleefully to crime ' . She can make an argument saying she had good intentions ...the good intention being getting him away from Archana who in her opinion was a bad mother who neglected him shamefully .Yet we see that Varsha has served her time .Not everyone in PR has gone scot free for their crimes . Only the leads ...Archana and Purvi have .Archana asked Madhuri to lie in court ...that her marraige with Dharmesh was not legal . It was a blatant crime , that perjury .Purvi was asking Arjun to commit blatant perjury in court .Purvi burnt office files to get back at Sachu .Purvi used her influence with the judge to get decisions in Archana's favour when the ARMAN divorce case was on .All these r crimes . I asked for justice when each of them was done .Sachu had kept quiet to witnessing forged signatures . Although i had defended him then i had absolutely no problem him suffering the legal consequences ...i had however asked why Archana had suffered none for her crime .I had no problems if Ovi was handed over to social securities if she persisted with her drinking when she was pregnant . I had myself suggested in a post this .I would like to know if my child lived or died . Nobody has this right to keep it from me ...i would catch the collar of the person if it ever came to light .Even swapping babies without the parents knowledge is terrible .If the nature of the crime is compared ...the crimes like perjury , influencing judges etc were known to all who sat in or opposite in court .The crimes r not not known and they affect lives . The choices and rights of certain individuals have been taken away .Varsha has been punished for affecting a life . Soham too . Why not Onir ? Good intentions can be argued fabulously . Good intentions for whom ??Onir swapped the babies not due to any good intentions ...but bcoz Purvi told him . He had personally no intention whatsoever of swapping the babies and lessening Ovi's grief . He did it coz he could not refuse Mishti anything . Mishti and his one sided love for her was his weakness .Well , Mishti was wrong . And in listening to her and damning his professional ethics , Onir was wrong . In not saying a blunt NO he was wrong . Listening to a screwed up 19 yr old who had hitherto only lied lied and lied and made a royal mess of her life was the height of stupidity .See Arjun's reaction upon finding the possibility that he had a baby who died . He said 'what the hell r u talking about ' . He was livid with Mittal .The crimes started when Onir framed reports to hide Purvi's pregnancy .It finally led to a point where he exchanged babies and did not tell the parents the truth of their dead offspring .Varsha was not a seasoned criminal . The kidnapping was her only offence . Yet she has paid .Soham has paid for his offences though Soham was more seasoned than Varsha .Archana and Purvi have gone scot free .Sachu himself did not commit the forgery but kept quiet about who did it . For that he got a resounding slap .Onir has also commited a serious offense . It has gone way beyond the offence now ...he has been reduced to stamping out any evidence shedding light on his deed .To hide one lie he went on a moral downfall . To hide Purvi's pregnancy it started with the mere framing up of a report which ultimately led to bigger things .Instead he should have advised her to come clean , take the flak once and for all and join him in Kolkata as he was not going to judge her for her past .That would have spoken volumes for the character .Btw i don't find him either elderly or boring . I find him perfect . His 'davaiyaan lo' dialogue is the same as Arjun's 'Relax' dialogue and his age cannot be surmised ...he has an ageless quality about him . No , these r not the things i would fault him with . I fault him for agreeing to all of Purvi's nonsense .
Kool 🤗, how are you doing? Taking a weekend break from studies, so visited the forum 😛
Coming to the post, I actually don't fault Varsha for kidnapping Soham at all. At least the last time. She was essentially a drug addict, her addiction being Soham. She knew that, and she even tried refusing to take him when Archana insisted in the party. Instead, Archana wanted to prove a point and thrust him on varsha and she lost her will and ran away with him. Soham's kidnap was solely archana's fault and to a lesser extent, manav's. It was their responsibility to take care of him being his parents, even if they didn't know about Varsha's obsession with Soham. Where I do hold Varsha responsible is letting Soham be raised by and into a hooligan, a crime-lord. She was educated, worked for a large part of her adult life (right?) in what I assume to be senior management positions and instead of using her education to make a life for herself and for Soham, she became a keep and even worse completely destroyed Soham's life. Soham honestly was in some ways in better hands with her since he was always her first priority, and if she had educated him and given him a good life where he could make choices for a career and lifestyle that did not involve becoming a bahubali I would have thought running away with Soham was the best thing to have happened to him. But, we can all see what she did make of him, and that is criminal in my eyes.
No arguments on Archana and purvi, they've both done whatever they wanted with the arrogance of feeling they're always right, destroying many many lives in the process. Nobody else can even reach to their level simply because they don't even stop to think that they might be wrong unlike all the others who at the very least acknowledge to themselves that they're doing wrong but still go ahead with it for whatever reasons. This is what makes archana and purvi both very powerful and very dangerous, because they're so confident they're never wrong ultimately their confidence wins over their victims accusations giving them more power to do more damage. Manav who had rightly held archana responsible for losing soham absolved her of all crimes when they met years later. He probably did it much before that because how can archana ever be wrong about anything when she's so confident she's not?
Sachu and Savita both committed crimes too. I think they did it for the right reasons from their perspective, they felt archana only caused havoc in their lives and she should be cut off altogether so she cant do any further damage. While I agree with the sentiment, the fact is that they did do crimes. And they got a slap and silence for their crimes. If you look from a different POV, they nearly succeeded in making life-changing decisions for manav and the twins without their knowledge, permission or acceptance. But since they had good intentions in trying to protect manav and the twins from archana and since I agreed with those sentiments, even the slap and the silence for Sachu and Savita seemed too much punishment especially the latter.
Onir did essentially the same thing. He did a crime, no doubt about that. But he did it with genuine intentions whether to continue to be in his mishti's good graces or to help Ovi, he did it and has so far stood by this decision even with his crazy wife and seemingly all the forces of the world trying to undo the situation. He can't go back in time and do things the right way, but he can make sure nothing changes the status quo in the present and in the future. What punishment should he get for his crime? And will it be his punishment alone? If the truth comes out, it'll be Ovi and Pari who will suffer the most for no fault of their own in this mess. Onir may or may not go to jail, he may get a slap or a garland, he may be banished or welcomed with aarti; either way, he will not be suffering more than Ovi who will not only have lost her own baby but also the baby she's come to love as her own, Pari. And if Pari is purvi's baby, then she should have been still premature raising doubts about her paternity which will lead to further and complete destruction of Ovi's life. When the collateral damage is so much and to an innocent party at that, it is better Onir or purvi's crime of swapping the babies does not come to light at all. His punishment is staying away from the baby he clearly loves by taking away his wife to Kolkata, and this court-case giving him a wake-up call on how far he's gone off track. He is basically a good guy with a clear head, occasionally (now regularly) blinded by his love for the wrong person. But he has done a lot of good, and has the capacity to do still more, so for his own sake as well as for Ovi's and Pari's, I wish he's acquitted and goes back to Kolkata away from the circle of doom that is the Karanjkar-Deshmukh families. Pari is Ovi's daughter now, and so she should be for both their sakes.
Seher Hone Ko Hai
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
