Purvi is just plain annoying - Page 3

Originally posted by: Sakhile

datz gr8 but in ur pov.,in my pov its plain favour .,4 every children parents comes b4 all even love.,purvi is not manupulative.,she had no choice left other dan 2 give up arjun.,bcoz of it she suffered and suffering

Originally posted by: mishti31

No I dnt think Purvi is annoying. In fact i dnt find nething wrong in Ovi also. This is just they r doing what they learnt from their parents/elders. Purvi was with Archu n she alws saw her mom to sacrifice her wishes for others so she learnt tht only and sacrificed her love "Arjun" for her mom. While Ovi was with Savita who alws want her loved ones to be close to her by hook or crook. So ovi learnt that only.

Originally posted by: sugni007

I had exact same thoughts few days back and expressed here. To my surprise, I realized now we can't even express our opinion honestly about a character on this forum.

My post started getting so much bashing form purvi fans. I was shocked.

Anyways, I agree with you. When she left mumbai for arjun-Ovi, what made her go back even after all the incidents with ovi at calcutta?

Another Q- she marries Onir, doesn't tell him past. and now she expects Onir to do what she says. She wants to control everyone- first arjun (do what I say) now Onir (do what I say). The way Ovi behaved with Onir, if he refuses to treat her, will any wife will just leave him overnight without telling? WHAT IS ONIR"s FAULT?

also now she has no problem staying in same home with Ovi inspite of knowing Ovi hates her.

I mean plain ridiculous-

But once again PURVI FANS- I understand this is drama and they have to somehow bring story back to mumbai and so do Onir to mumbai,

Originally posted by: sashashyam

But don't you think there is a difference between sacrificing YOUR wishes for the happiness of others, and sacrificing ANOTHER PERSON, in this case Arjun, so that your mother can get her family back, and, by extension, YOUR dearest wish can be fulfilled? This seems to me to be the opposite of sacrifice.

I am totally agreeying with u in.. Arjun is not a thing or wish which she cn sacrifice for her mom.. bt tht time she found it as the only way to keep her mum happy. I noe she ws wrong n m not denying it.. bt calling her selfish and annoying for this reason is wrong. She did a mistake(even biggest mistake of her life).. And Archu did the same for Shravani... she sacrificed manav(although she dint forced him the way purvi did bt she defo sacrificed her love).
The irony of all this was that in the end, Archana was accepted by the Deshmukhs NOT because of Purvi dumping Arjun, but because Teju exposed Savita and what she had done 18 years ago. Till then, Manav was telling DK that Purvi's tyaag had been in vain as there was still no place for Archana in his family.

So true.. bt deep smwhere only coz of purvi's so called tyaag Sachu felt guilty n talked with Savita which Teju overheard and exposed Savita.

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Mishti,

This is a very interesting point of view, and I appreciate it.

But as regards @blue, don't you think there is a difference between sacrificing YOUR wishes for the happiness of others, and sacrificing ANOTHER PERSON, in this case Arjun, so that your mother can get her family back, and, by extension, YOUR dearest wish can be fulfilled? This seems to me to be the opposite of sacrifice.

Purvi could have jumped off that hilltop for her mother's sake, and I would have no problems with that. But she did not, she emotionally blackmailed and coshed Arjun into figuratively jumping off that hilltop and into a miserable marriage. As Sakhile has put it so well (and, incidentally, saved me a lot of effort!), emotional blackmail is the worst kind of blackmail, because you use it on those who love you and you take unfair advantage of their love for you.

So, I do not think Purvi can be equated with Archana in this respect. She did not just sacrifice herself, which would have been noble, she destroyed a trusting boy who loved her beyond reason, and this for her own ends.

The irony of all this was that in the end, Archana was accepted by the Deshmukhs NOT because of Purvi dumping Arjun, but because Teju exposed Savita and what she had done 18 years ago. Till then, Manav was telling DK that Purvi's tyaag had been in vain as there was still no place for Archana in his family.

Shyamala B.Cowsik

Originally posted by: prityy89

Yes we are all entitled to our point of view. Children may be prepared to sacrifice for their parents. Parents on the other hand want to see their children happy. They do not want their children to sacrifice for their sakes. Archana said as much herself.

Purvi had choices, Arjun had choices. Purvi did not have to allow herself to be blackmailed by Ovi and thus put Arjun in the position of having to marry Ovi.

Arjun had the option of saying "No1", a word most children learn very early on in life.

They both suffered because they failed to take the right decisions at the right time.

Originally posted by: crazygirl4RD

Ohhh pritty, u r wrong dear purvi is indeed manupulative n cunning as she wished happiness for her mother n her family n wanted her pyscho sis to get her so called love ...she is cunning as she still thinks of arjun as she loves him still ,coz it is a sin ...

purvi is indeed selfish coz she came to mumbai just to make sure ovi gets treated by onir...

purvi is cunning as she proposed the deal to ovi n made her marry arjun even though ovi rejected the deal proposed by purvi

Originally posted by: Sakhile

archana said like dat but she's njoying vid her family.,its all bcoz of purvi.,though purvi,arjun is suffering d reason y dey did such sacrifice doesn't go in vein.,purvi always wanted 2 see archana happy and she succeeded in dat .,as far as arvi is concerened d story is yet 2 unfold