EDT : Post your views/Discussns HERE only - Page 118

Why make Savita the villain always and sweep the real issue under the rug? What savita did with sachu is wrong, no justification for that. Doesn't mean that for every problem, they just show her doing something at the end so it looks like she's the perpetrator of all the problems when it's really not the case.

Originally posted by: rash2222

@dabula archana never forced vaishali to go back to dharmesh it was shown clearly dat he blackmailed vaishali and it was truly vaishali's decision to go back to dharmesh ... so stop bashing archana for it...

Originally posted by: rash2222

im sorry vaishali stopped talking to archana after she came to know dat she is more in favour of madhuri dan her own sister and she never told her dat her baby needs a father infac t she use to tell dat wat if dharmesh did dis to u... god has given u d baby and will bring back ur happiness... she told madhuri to do dat when vaishali told her to ask madhuri to do dis work coz vaishali lawyers suggested her dis thing ... i think u missed on dose episodes

And it was so unnecessary!! I mean Soham's kidnap and assumed death may have been necessary for story to move forward, and also Archana's role in it so that Arman could be separated for the leap. Either Manav or Archana had to do something big for them to be separated; they showed Archana doing that and keeping her in character, what was shown was plausible. While it is also in Savita's character to try everything to make sure Archana stays out, it's so unnecessary when all the work for moving the story forward had already been done. For the sake of the story and character growth, I can accept certain things that make me queasy. Not when they're thrown in just to make a point that Savita's the villain in case anyone forgets.

And Archu was definitely responsible for Vaishu going back to Dharmu, and Varun being declared illegitimate. Not that Vaishu and Madhuri didn't have a part themselves. They did, but Archana had a much bigger part. She convinced the guilty and vulnerable Madhuri to lie in court that Dharmu was not her husband and Varun's father. No one else did that; Vaishali wouldn't even talk to Madhuri directly and rest of the K family didn't bother either way. It was Archana who wanted Vaishali to go back to Dharmesh after all the unnecessary drama of hiding Vaishali at her place and getting Manav defamed in the process, and it was her who convinced madz to declare Varun illegitimate in court. If Madhuri wouldn't have done that, Vaishali may still have gone back to Dharmesh; but Varun would be the legitimate heir and not Aniket.

no archana never told vaishali to go back to dharmesh... it was vaishsali's lawyer who gave vaishali dis idea of proving madhuri a illegimate wife of dharmesh and vaishali den pleade in front of archana to do dis ... after dat divorced happened... it was shown in d flashack scene dat dharmesh blackmailed vaisali after dat vaishali wet back to dharmesh ... i dot see archana involvment here

Originally posted by: rash2222

no archana never told vaishali to go back to dharmesh... it was vaishsali's lawyer who gave vaishali dis idea of proving madhuri a illegimate wife of dharmesh and vaishali den pleade in front of archana to do dis ... after dat divorced happened... it was shown in d flashack scene dat dharmesh blackmailed vaisali after dat vaishali wet back to dharmesh ... i dot see archana involvment here

Love my Late dear beloved MIL and her golden sentence...RIP Maa