Kool's Commentary : Feb 1 PR - Page 4

Originally posted by: tiya229

kools, didnt see your commeent abt your poorane khayalat till now.

if having naye khayalat means the Cvs., then i am SOO happy with your( and mine) poorane khayalat. s

eriously, if naye khayalat mean not taking care of your parents and kid, butting in EVERYONE's issues, and going back to your philandering husband, then I dont WANT those khayalats.

kools, your commentary is the saving grace of the show, and sends the right message to many who are both active and silent members of the forum. what the cvs show is utter BS and completely wrong.

take the case of varsha: what are they saying? that if a woman cant bear kids, she is worthless or incomplete? i know my cousion in india, whose wife chose to adopt, rather than bear kids. now is she an incomplete woman?

the way i see it, "you are fighting the BS given by the Cvs, one commentary at a time"

keep going with your commentary, because, i feel Cvs, should take NOTE all the valid points made.

i dont know, if you remember the dialogue vaishu gave to dharmesh, abt staying away from her or else she'll take him to court. see I LOVED that dialogue, i WISH the CVs explored that angle. it would have set vaishu apart from the rest of the k-Klan. but alas, she is going back to him. i am so mad.

Originally posted by: Swatrocks

Mast commentary di..Hw r u? Taken ur advice seriously..Finished my one semester few days back.. LOVE U DI for showing me the right path..I am fed up of this serial...Dont wanna say nythng abt it..Agree with ur each nd every point..I want my responsible Manav back.. PLZ request cv'S to bring him back.. BYE DI..LOVE U..

y am i not surprised wid the idiotic advice archu gave vaishu?when has she ever done sumthng sensible?

I guess since PR is such a great show according to the TRPs it must be reflecting the Indian (nay the Marathi ?) culture – but of course I am not much accustomed to this cultural degeneration that is being depicted in this serial or maybe I live in a time that has changed where sons (and oh daughters also take care of their parents, too) don't take care of their old parents – but PR is a top serial so surely the Indian mass must be liking it – right, yes- so definitely a moral degeneration has set in. Or maybe it is an effect of forums like these where the storyline are controls by viewers who like actors so much that the characters, the play or even the moral undertone take a back sit – I mean how many times I have seen viewers just like to see romances or dances by the lead that the story has to accommodate those whims most often killing the very essence of the story or the different characters….I guess I am dumb who looks at the quality of the story and how the characters match up – to me the whole saga of Dharmesh just don't match up….but the storyline was stretched because most viewers wanted to see his character's downfall (not sure whether the viewers disliked the character or the actor more in this case)– I guess people identify a character fall much better than a shady business dealing and an ethical backlash!

Just me and my whimsical dreams of having a storyline that is much more wholesome and not fragmented to show the lead (made popular by the views) dictates the flow……