Posted:
Anjali,
Dharmesh did value Manavs' work.He did talk to him and ask him in a friendly way no to resort to brawls within factory premises.I didnt see him doing it for Prakash.
He employed Archana on his partner Satishs' reco as he had been her boss previously.He didnot do it as a personal favour.I find Satish doing it though.I find Satish is in too much awe of ArMans' goodness that he hardly thinks professionally.
And,if Manav is so talented and is an excellent worker,I dont see why he shud fail to secure a job anywhere else,based on his experience and capabilities.Intead of saying I will quit if Manav is fired,Satish cud have talked with his other friends and got Manav a job.That wud have helped.His quiting the factory is of no use to anyone concerned.It sounds so silly coming from the co-partner of a company.
Dharmesh was never in favour of giving job to Ajit.Again it was Satish and Archana.
If tom,worker union starts headed by a not-so-worthy leader,leading to strikes,only Satish and Archana are to be blamed.
All the workers started talking about nepotism after they saw Archana pleading to Dharmesh for Ajit and then Satish supporting her.
We,actually dont see any worker dissatisfaction over Manavs' sacking.But we do see worker dissatisfied with Ajit getting a job.
If Satish n Archana wanted to persuade Dharmesh to give Ajit a job,they should have done it within closed doors.Archana was wrong in running and pleading after Dharmesh infront of the whole office.Very wrong.It led to tongues wagging.Satish was even more wrong in supporting her infront of all staff.
Workers hardly talk about Dharmeshs' attitude.They r ok and satisfied with his way of handling things.WHat they didnt like was Satish n Archana persuading Dharmesh Sir to bend his rules.
Kabhi Neem Neem Kabhi Shahad Shahad
