My two cents.......... . What Varsha has to realise is that the world is not perfect , her mother in law is not perfect , SHE HERSELF is not perfect . . The fact remains that she DID have an affair with a married man before her marraige . They r not living in an elitist Shobhaa DE kind of society but in lower middle class dombivli .........where traditional middle class values prevail .
The fact also remains that she was NOT succesful in telling Satish about this before her marraige .He wud not listen is a lame excuse . They went out umpteen number of times and if she had chosen , she cud indeed drown his voice , ask him to pay serious attention and mAKE him listen , she is that kind of tough gal .
Now the fact that the married man was at fault , not Varsha , she had been conned , has been proven , ok . But why shud various other question marks NOT be in her sasural people's minds ? Like for instance ........how far did the affair go with that cheap fella? He was in this for free sex , not for values or doing bhajans . Did this girl SLEEP AROUND before marraige in that getting conned phase ? Satish can even begin wondering if thats the reason she is NOT consummating her marraige with him . I am not saying the doubts r correct or justifying them .All I am saying is in that traditional mind set , her sasural people can indeed think this way too .
Instead we see that they r not even thinking that way .Mohanrao is a gem of a man . Satish stood by her although she gave him nothing in the marraige , and Bhavna too is not dwelling on these petty issues but apologized and wants to start on a fresh page. She has already fallen flat on her face , what more apology shud she ask from the Karanjkars ? Even the Karanjkars r not expecting it ......it is too embarassing for both the families , that apology . Some things in life are handled delicately , intricately . Not so childishly or crudely . What if Varsha had a MIL who questioned her about her affair in a very petty way ? Wud she be able to ride her high horse then or be pretty flabbergasted trying to explain herself and her character ?
From Bhavnas POV , who will she trust first ..........a jamaai of 10 years or a bahu who came just 15 days ago ? She is human after all . Did Varsha trust Manav ? Did Sulochna.her mom , trust Manav ? So why ride such a high horse ?
If not for anyone else , how about putting everything behind for that gem of a husband Satish , who stood by her although she has tO DATE given him nothing in this marraige ?
Why had she married then , if she was not 'prepared' for marraige in true sense ? To placate her parents why did she decide to throw a marraige on their face to see satisfaction in their aged eyes and in the process sacrifice Satish as a bali ka bakra ? How much shud Bhavna and Satish be angry for this if it comes to that ?
If Satish cud do so much for her , why cannot she do this trivial thing for Satish ? The truth is shje has given nOthing to Satish in this marraige and even now she is not capable of giving him anything . He did everything for herwhen she was in a difficult position but she , inspite of seeing that he is being put in a very difficult position by her unrelenting stand , is doing NOTHING for him .
How much shud a person apologise for her mistakes ? How much grovelling shud she do ? She came to the function , behaved very good to her maayka people , gave her vahini gift and did the honors , came alone tagging behind although bahu had left in a huff . Is it good culture to treat your mother in law this way at your maayka ? She is an aged woman , that age desrves some respect , that relation that she is the husbands mother after all deserves some respect . Shud that aged woman fall on her knees in a public square till Varsha comes around ? Is not the pain of seeing Urmis marraige bREAK ......Urmi , who is almost a daughter to Bhavna, a karmic punishment for Bhavna ?
She asked Archna why shud her feelings go away with an apology ....whats the big deal about the apology . So An apology does not have any meaning ? Why shud people even bother to apologise then ? Apology denotes a conscience and hence is given great value on a human level . See Rasika , does she apologise ? She has no conscience , plain and simple. She was the type who wud instead ulta tell Varsha publicly ..so what ?So ok the married guy conned u , how r we to know how far u went in that affair ? What , he left u like that only , or what ? Aisa hi chodega ka kya woh ? Baat Karti hai !
Sounds crude , disgusting na ?But thats the world for u . And This reality check shud be given to Varsha by her MUM and her elder sis in VERY SHARP WORDS . For once , MISS SHAKKAR was RIGHT .