!!PNZKSK Episode Discussion Thread # 36 !! - Page 17

Originally posted by: chitsss

For starters he suspects foul play! Secondly he wants to clear her from the murder charge , it was an accident and she should be tried for that.

Besides even in an accident its not always the driver who is at fault , if the victim was not careful and walked into the path of the car one cannot really blame the driver, so as a lawyer Kunal is not compromising any principles here!

Originally posted by: Rush2220

WHO spoke about cctv camera dayb4 y'day 🤣

Originally posted by: chitsss

Yipeee!!!!!!😃😃

Originally posted by: chitsss

For starters he suspects foul play! And the proof is?????

Secondly he wants to clear her from the murder charge , it was an accident and she should be tried for that. That is ok.. but based on WU, it seems as if he saying that she will be free? How? Even if it is tried for accident charge, she deserves punishment...😊

Besides even in an accident its not always the driver who is at fault , if the victim was not careful and walked into the path of the car one cannot really blame the driver: And in this case who is going to prove this? I believe there were no witnesses right?

so as a lawyer Kunal is not compromising any principles here! For me his principles were thrown out of the window a long time ago... 😊

Originally posted by: SINAL_amulg

siddhi in kitchen thinking abt thakral's talks and veena comes and asks her wht she is doing.

her hand might hv burnt.

siddhi saying tht nothing can happen 2 her and veena's anand. (really surprising siddhi saying this)

veena said 2 siddhi tht she listens to her whtever she said abt the child fr her happiness. siddhi & seema r her daughters through which this family is moving on.

Originally posted by: -Rani

Very Well said Chitra👏

Originally posted by: shweta_r

Dont know about anyone else but I did mention that without a CCTV camera no case gets solved in Parichay