Originally posted by: SteFanSalvaTor
It doesn’t even make sense in my head, at one end she just broke Romana’s heart and in the other end she’s changing about baddua, what exactly does she think? If baddua ruined her then should not she go back to Roma and bring her back as she should have already learnt her lesson?
So from what I have understood about her character is that she is shown as a hollow person .. someone who doesnt know the depth of any feelings other than herself, forget others .. and definitely not love .. such feelings are only superficial and thats what her character is shown to be ..
Things are now getting clearer .. its like dhuaan uth raha hai aur saaf dikhayi de raha hai .. Writers are showing two different worlds to us and the definition or perception of love through them .. Rich vs Poor .. and Love through them .. Through Feedi & Romana, you get an understanding of the depth of their feelings, the value of love, things are not superficial for them .. they actually carry a lot of weight .. whereas through Mahi & Sikander their fake izzat & rutba matters to them, not love .. love to them is very superficial ..
So back to the convo, people who are superficial, do not & cannot understand other people's pain or love because they cant see beyond themselves .. To Mahi, her in-law izzat, just like her family izzat, is more important than Romana - a poor prostitute's true love .. sorry for the word ..
1k