Posted:
Originally posted by: ~DaZZ|ing~
Ami, couldn't they have shown a progressive ending? Wasn't the whole point of the show to break social taboos by educating the audience in the right manner? Granted cyber cases of such nature may be on the rise there, but wouldn't a positive outcome have yielded better results for society as a whole? I'm not understanding such an illogical end. If you think about it, we could've guessed the final conclusion from the theme song itself.Saya bhi saath jab chor jayeAisi hi tanhai šThat's exactly what happened in the end. Pakeezah lost her shadow (Humza) to emerge stronger and more fierce.
@Friends : I read all your comments about the end. I share the same feelings and don't agree with the end.
Everyone is Tanha in the end, the characters as well the viewers. There is so much void, something is missing.
Yes, DAZZ, you are totally right about the above highlighted interpretation.
Since yesterday I am thinking about this.
Somewhere you have to come to terms to the fact.
Finally trying to see from director and writer's POV:
Makers took very sensitive subject and seems to have done thorough research on the subject.
I feel that we don't have much idea about the sentiments, thoughts, religion, and culture of the land where this show airs.
It wouldn't not have been the the best to show Humza and Pakeeza together and Kinza as a divorcee.
Person like Humza giving divorcee doesn't seem to go well with the character sketch and hence this end. Writers are pretty good here. I can't come up with any other reason for the end.
Fan Fictions
47