Um you keep accusing me of concluding that about Divek, while you keep pushing one SS as evidence to make me believe that it was Divek.
I didn't start this implication, I am simply asking questions which no one is going to answer since they are too busy pretending that they never propagated the allegation against Divek as soon as the video came out. I just want to know why, when there is no solid proof against them.
I wish I had seen the same people coming here and asking me why am I concluding stuff when similar people were bashing Divek for it on different threads, the IF article as soon as the video came out but no one dared to ask them- why divek?
I put forth whatever I had to, if that constitutes bashing in your book. I can't help that. Not everything is war.