Dil Ka Rishta - My viewpoint

Naj at your insistence I am posting this and thanks for the title.. PS: These are my views and yes there are assumptions made based on the dialouges and the scenes. The creatives may show full picture or may not. But the art of story telling is that it is left to the audience to interpret it.

Originally posted by: dsupriya

Naj at your insistence I am posting this and thanks for the title.. PS: These are my views and yes there are assumptions made based on the dialouges and the scenes. The creatives may show full picture or may not. But the art of story telling is that it is left to the audience to interpret it.

I just thought of this NK CVS are weaving beautiful story on life and relationships. Life comes full circle and I believe in it. Here also life has come full circle. Earlier when Avni was broken from her past and she had no place for love. It is Neil who held her hand to give her justice. He slowly broke down her walls of hurt. He made her believe in love again. He made her trust relationships showed her beauty of family.

Now life has come full circle.

It is Neil who is broken from guilt. Guilt of not able to save a woman he loved from a hell hole. From getting raped. From getting sold. He will get a closure to this guilt only when Juhi gets back her child who is only ray of hope for her. So Avni is now helping the person who taught her love to give a closure. She is mending his broken and burdened soul with guilt. She is reciprocating it because that is the love she has understood. Love which is not selfish.

And in the end of it even if they mutually agree to Neil giving the child his name. What is wrong in it. It is second to adoption. What is wrong if they adopt the child. World need not end there and they can have their child also.

Originally posted by: appisuri

I second ur each and every word It is Avni turn to support Neil which she is doing marvelously well and will be doing so I don't find anything wrong if Neil give his name to the kid ( Avni should be part of this decision ) or they adopt the kid which I think has high possibility because kid was having mock shoot with Aditi.

Thanks for it. Exactly if Avni is part of the decision to give Neil's name to the child, then it should be okay right. I am definitely not in favor of Neil taking that decision on his own. But if it is a mutual decision what is wrong in it.

As long as Avni knows the truth and the full truth, and then makes a decision herself its fine. I feel her mahanta could be attributed to her childhood problems. She's not normal like us mortals 😆 and probably is ready to go to any extent out of selfless love. Although its quite irritating, I can understand her doing that out of love.

I agree.It should be the decision of both Avni & Neil.

Originally posted by: subiaman

As long as Avni knows the truth and the full truth, and then makes a decision herself its fine. I feel her mahanta could be attributed to her childhood problems. She's not normal like us mortals 😆 and probably is ready to go to any extent out of selfless love. Although its quite irritating, I can understand her doing that out of love.

But if she's being misled/lied upon then thats a big NO NO for me. I hope Neil keeps her in the loop. She deserves atleast that much after all that she has done for him.

It was beautifully written Supriya, hence my suggestion of posting it

While I agree to everything you said, I have to put my two cents for Neil giving Juhi's child his name.
If it is truly what he wants and Avni wants, then it is their choice, their mutual decision.
But my point is.. why does he have to give that child his name?

Does a mother have no role to play in her child's life? Does she not have the rights on her child? Why does a child need a father's name ?
I know of many single mothers who are brilliant at their parenting skills and work too, and have no qualms letting their kids grow up taking their last name as their surname.

So honestly it will be moot for me to see Neil giving Juhi's child his name (if it is not his child) just to keep up with the term Naamkaran'
Juhi is a mature adult who can certainly take care of her kid on her own and give it her name.

Everything else, I totally second you.
It is good to see Avni doing so much to help the man who mended her, have his own closure.
It only strengthens their own bond together. 😊

Originally posted by: Simi1711

While I agree to everything you said, I have to put my two cents for Neil giving Juhi's child his name.
If it is truly what he wants and Avni wants, then it is their choice, their mutual decision.
But my point is.. why does he have to give that child his name?

Does a mother have no role to play in her child's life? Does she not have the rights on her child? Why does a child need a father's name ?
I know of many single mothers who are brilliant at their parenting skills and work too, and have no qualms letting their kids grow up taking their last name as their surname.

So honestly it will be moot for me to see Neil giving Juhi's child his name (if it is not his child) just to keep up with the term Naamkaran'
Juhi is a mature adult who can certainly take care of her kid on her own and give it her name.

Everything else, I totally second you.
It is good to see Avni doing so much to help the man who mended her, have his own closure.
It only strengthens their own bond together. 😊

The USP of NK is a strong ML and a strong FL. Indian shows are known to compromise characters for any stupid twist. I love Avneil chemistry, love to see them romance but above all I love their honesty towards one another and how they work together as a team. At no stage do I want that compromised for any kind of twist.