Do u think Mohan is right? - Page 4

Originally posted by: subhas123

Mohan checked the materials used in construction in some lab. It was shown. He would have done handwriting verification too. What more he can do?

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Was that member u Khushi ? Sorry dear , dont take it wrong , I was not being purposefully offensive .I skimmed thru the thread and mentioned the question that interested me , bas .Next time I will adress u by ur name .😊

Originally posted by: --khushi--

how much i remember he checked the material used in some other building...that time they didn't even showed Mohika convo and then Mohan's decision to go to bhopal and check it...if m not wrong that time teh amn said the materials is absolutely fine and tehn he said further that he too checked Mahananada flyover's material and that was very cheap and not gud as quality marks...

i dont remember the proper scene but i think it happened that way only

Originally posted by: --khushi--

na dear no needs to say sorry 😊 ... yup it was me and its not like i personally like to be addressed as my anme only... i said it for all...not only me for anybody using that member i think is bit harsh specially when user names r there ...plz dont mind it...i just said whatever i feel😊

Originally posted by: --khushi--

how much i remember he checked the material used in some other building...that time they didn't even showed Mohika convo and then Mohan's decision to go to bhopal and check it...if m not wrong that time teh amn said the materials is absolutely fine and tehn he said further that he too checked Mahananada flyover's material and that was very cheap and not gud as quality marks...

i dont remember the proper scene but i think it happened that way only

Originally posted by: subhas123

@ khushi

He verified his proofs in a lab earlier and his evidence has been accepted by the commission. Here the commision procedure shown is false. Because even if they got evidence from mohan, they should re-evaluate it. But this procedure was skiped by the CVs for story convenience. So atleast acc. to serial rules, mohan has done his work.

What we are saying is because we get to know that amar was indeed innocent. WE also get to know that Dinanath and koyal fooled mohan. Bu he has no idea about it. He only thinks that vyas family is refusing to accept the visible truth.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

A journalist only has his sources . He puts his findings before HIS EDITOR . The EDITOR decides to publish or not . The journalist's responsibility ENDS there . He can go scot free . The EDITOR [ in this case Prernas husband} bears the full responsibility . If his story is DISPROVED , he has to publish APOLOGY . If his story is proven false , he has to bear brunt of getting SUED .

There is no way of knowing if a SOURCE is telling truth or not , except a hunch . Its exactly the way COPS operate on various crime scenes when they have nothing to go upon .

How r u saying not a single time he tried to verify truth ? Did not he come to Vyas Family to hear theoir side of the story ? Did he just trust Koyal and go ahead with the story ?No ...he was FAIR . He came to give them a chance to tell THEIR side of the story . They cud have asked him on what basis he was going ahead with his story and if he had told them that he had signed documents of Amar as proof these people could have demanded to see them for verification .

They shut him out . Later in the garden , Megha fleetingly told him that all she had was a belief . Beautiful as it sounds , it does not hold water in the real world .

If they sue Prernas husband ...They will have to answer in court of law...about WHY they did not hear the journalist out when he HAD come to give them a chance nd when he stood on the doorstep ringing the bell ...Why are they making such a hullaballooo NOW ...Why not do it back then .

Jounalists have thousands of sources . They hve no way of knowing if they r being tricked . All they can do is go to the opposite party to give them a fair chance of telling THEIR story too .

It often happens that an actor is accused of having an affair . Journalist understands from his source ...maybe a hotel manager who often sees them in his hotel . The journalist CANNOT publish without asking the actor HIS SIDE of the story . He cannot just rely on HIS source . Thats the way it works . The actor sometimes denies the rumor ...sometimes accepts it . Sometimes he is so irritated that he refuses to give his side of the story and shuts journalist out . If he does that , its HIS BURDEN .

And thats precisely what Vyas family did . Mohan did his job . They were the ones who went about proving Amar right in a wrong way .