Devil's game- All for a cause - Page 3

Originally posted by: sonali.19281

In theory I wld not be replying to your post but i am compelled to as Its my thread.. coz unfortunately our convictions have NO CONNECT...😆 I havent asked for anyone's reply infact I havent even read your post hence its understandable there is no connection😃

on your point of mourning LOSS.. loss of what.. As I see it.. one-sided love which wasnt requited is hardly a LOSS.. that always remains.. V has lived with the impression that S never loved him.. hence you cant lose what you never had.. for SEPARATION there needs to be TOGETHERNESS.. the proposal of which was never reciprocated by Sabina.. blame the world. .but it was HER CHOICE.. Irrespective of S accepting or refusing his love its still a loss of VV's love when he sees no success in it.

No one is Judging Sabina was staying in with VO.. its her utter stupidity to ask a married man.. and his equal stupidity to respond is being questioned.. people just abuse broad-mindedness.. Parimita's modern philosophy quoted.. modernism is advancement.. not abandonment of social norms.. Although the intent was good.. VO-S living situation is a breach of social conduct.. more so from VO domestic POV.. in Ramayan Ram may have trusted Sita.. but Ram the KING was answerable to his empire... for that very breach.. as much as you would want to one CANT ALIENATE SOCIETY.. even if you do.. would you want to alienate the trust of your own spouse and child.. and cause them misery..

I dont appreciate Ram for wht he did to Sita rest already commented they are responsible for their actions

We live in a world where all humans are equal whether rich or poor, black or white

extremely generic statement this.. as a scientist I can pretty much show that ALL HUMANS ARE NOT THE SAME.. Equal can mean equal rights if thats what you imply.. and Am all for tht.. But this idealist statement holds less water in reality.. Equal rights may or maynot translate into equal opinion.. I am in no means going to hold equal opinion of Amartya Sen and Kareena kapoor.. altho both are rich.. from the same race.. and meet your criteria cited..

Equal rights dont translate into EQUAL value. I am obviously going to value my family more than I value ANY OUTSIDER.. as subjective as it may sound.. thats my CONVICTION and I stand for it..

the sad part about idealism is it sounds good but hardly makes a stand.. much like the statement you just provided..

well as a doctor I can tell you all humans are the same and equal no rich man managed to die a different death, no rich man succeded to take a single penny with them when they die and IMV is no different.

An finally let me just justify relating to IMV.. much as I love equal rights.. I can not suffer fools😆.. I may empathize with them.. and take them as special needs.. but they wont get equal treatment.. obviously not..

Case rested..

Kindly dont reply to this post coz as already clarified I dont await any ones reply. I make a general comment mostly as per my choice. I havent got that kind of time to indulge in such activity and I find it rude not to reply when some one replies to me.
Hope case is truly rested

Originally posted by: sonali.19281

@Sree.m : well I wont reply to your above post.. but wld request you to keep your arena separate.. I of course dont see why you even would wanna post if you HAVENT read my main post as such.. or don't know the point of discussion...

I definitely don't endorse picking and choosing statements and running home with stringent views.. esp in the absence of sight of context.. which you clearly have mentioned you have none (as in the context awareness)..

you are entitled to refuse the request.. but we like to keep it clean around our lil click.. and trust me we do have a relaxed perception of people and things.. but clearly your posts have been filled with adjectives pertaining to people's POV which are offensive.. and therefore I would request you to refrain from posting.. we take pride in civility around here.. and I wont want to change that for anything..

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

It is boorish to Judge Sabina becouse of her mothers profession and character but you seem to imagine something else

And what is that ?

Sorry missed this post, but I have to admit that I dont the luxury of writing long posts, you should be knowing it better what you are assuming should you go back and read your own post.

That was her choice and this is his choice, VV has a freedom to live his life by his own whims and fancies

Undoubtedly an attractive theme but Sorry I don't believe in living life according to 'whims' and fancies as u put it . Life is too precious , I wud take good advice even if it came from the Devil's mouth . For me it does not matter WHO gives the advice , what matters is the CONTENT and the sense in the advice . IMV gave V a good deal . Too bad he did not have the acumen to value it .

My comment was for VV. He is entilted to grieve and look forward to success in his dreams with S. its better VV doesnt pay head to such a fathers advice if he has to be like IMV who did not even hesitate to malign D as having adulterous relation with BB.

he is entitled to make his destiny but has no right to dictate destiny for others

I agree only here in principle . But It does not work that way in life is my experience .People r often guided or led by the more experienced ones or those in power . Its simply a fact of life .

Once again my comment was about the fictional story.