The Frankestein theory: Future of V. Industries

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#21

IMV was told by CP that he and he alone was responsible for his misery . Coz he clung on to his past and did not value the present . That was hailed by viewers , I still remember .

Why is special consideration being given to V when he is doing exactly the same thing ? Bcoz he is the lead ?😆

IMV and Sid had the brains to realise that although they were not in 'love' with their wives , they OWED some things to them once they committed to an institution called marraige . They did not sleep on seperate sofas and they did sire children , they did provide well and gave wives everything in a practical sense .

Is V even doing THAT ? He has taken D for granted in a way that even IMV has not done with Charu . Not only has he bluntly REFUSED all these things but is now insulting her publicly and expressing volatile passion for a married woman in front of ALL , even her so called husband .

Sid and IMV did not have perfect marraiges . But they were NOT this unfair to their wives .

Vaibhav cud learn a lesson from them . No one's marraige is perfect . Yet the world goes on , as person learns to accept reality and plods his way through , making his spouse happy in whichever way he can , whether his heart is in it or not .

It is not necessary that one has to wait till the RIGHT moment for the heart to flutter and ONLY then make a move towards making a spouse feel happy .

Sometimes the heart just does NOT flutter . But you made a commitment na , honor it !

IMV has been criticised for using Charu , manipulating Charu , tricking her .

But ironically , in Charu's ignorance lies Charu's bliss . IMV's stand is , do duties by her and keep things away from her that will DEFINETELY make her unhappy .

Not bad . Rather practical .

I do hope Vaibhav sees sense soon .

Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 13 years ago

Quote

Anmol Jain

@intruderfast

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#22

kools i disagreee😛😆😆

vv has been honest 👏, have imv and sid been honest noo

i dont want to go into imv charu relation , can u call it a normal relation , i blame him for keeping chru out of his life, yaa they had children , he gave her wife status, aish o aram he allowed her to do samaj seva but did he love her nooo

and abt sid , he never told rajvi abt his painting obsession , rajvi found it out ,

he improved relations with rajvi cos his mother asked him to

vv , has been honest, he said i can never give u love cos i love someone else, u get securirty my wife status, i will be ur friend

yes he has not told that sbaina was that girl, otherwise he has been completely honest to her

the other two men have not been

so vv will always be more admired 😃and he will get back to form soon

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

sonali.19281

@sonali.19281

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#23

I gladly disagree with both Kools and Paaji (to some extent)😆.. dont have a lot of time.. but to me.. no 2 people's lives and psyches are same.. and we cant expect everyone to live life on the same terms.. as far as people around you.. who are part of your inner circle and deal are fine with your terms.. All good.. besides it grossly unfair to compare a dramatic 3 month stint of marriage vs 9 yrs.. vs 30 yrs.. LOL.. as it is the first yr is the toughest.. Statistically speaking a corelation theory could only work if the sample size and hence the significance was similar..😉 so logic here flawed

I for myself could not have disregarded IMVs sentiments to uphold CPs.. yes I may have said CP is right in her way.. and was the only one fighting for her cause.. coz I completely see the right to live by your terms as legit.. I was also one of those who cried for IMV in the form of Ishwarya.. I felt for him.. away from CP .. apart from Charu.. for HIM.. so lets not get judgmental and continue respecting each other's POV and agree to disagree😆 without making it claustrophobic for the other's perspective..my 2 cents.. out of my own topic.. coz its not even close to the main theme 😆

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#24

so lets not get judgmental and continue respecting each other's POV and agree to disagree😆 without making it claustrophobic for the other's perspective..my 2 cents.. out of my own topic.. coz its not even close to the main theme 😆

My dear who is being judgemental 😆😆 ? And who is not respecting others POV here ...? Best forum I have seen in a long long time to come ...😊 I am sure no one here is even contemplating such a thing .

Speaking strictly for myself , my question was to viewers in general .😊 I see strong similrarities in IMV and V situation and want to state it so CVS read me 😆😆 Koun jaane , Mera Dialogue Use bhi karenge ?😃

Quote

sonali.19281

@sonali.19281

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
so lets not get judgmental and continue respecting each other's POV and agree to disagree😆 without making it claustrophobic for the other's perspective..my 2 cents.. out of my own topic.. coz its not even close to the main theme 😆

My dear who is being judgemental 😆😆 ? And who is not respecting others POV here ...? Best forum I have seen in a long long time to come ...😊 I am sure no one here is even contemplating such a thing .

Speaking strictly for myself , my question was to viewers in general .😊 I see strong similrarities in IMV and V situation and want to state it so CVS read me 😆😆 Koun jaane , Mera Dialogue Use bhi karenge ?😃

then its totally fine.. I JUST dont want us to be petty among ourselves and crib and bicker for no reason😆 as it is m like jubilant right.. ecstatic.. our Miseries ARE OVER...

COZ OUR DARK LORD IS BACKKK😎.. Now we shall SEE.. hahaha

Edited by sonali.19281 - 13 years ago

Quote

sonali.19281

@sonali.19281

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: angelshy
Shiv is back yay !!!

Joins you.. gosh we survived this 15 day torture man..😆now hopefully things will coem back to normal.. can VIRAL and Vipul come back too now.. and the OLD MB.. that we ALL LOVED..

now m GREEDY.. my lil hope worked.. remembered my debating with you that No news is good news.. and if they were replacing the word would be out sooner.. m sooo happy right now😆

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#27

but to me.. no 2 people's lives and psyches are same.. and we cant expect everyone to live life on the same terms.. as far as people around you.. who are part of your inner circle and deal are fine with your terms.. All good.. besides it grossly unfair to compare a dramatic 3 month stint of marriage vs 9 yrs.. vs 30 yrs.. LOL.. as it is the first yr is the toughest.. Statistically speaking a corelation theory could only work if the sample size and hence the significance was similar..😉 so logic here flawed

It has nothing to do with the number of years . The comparison is about the attitude towards an institution called MARRAIGE . The honoring of that institution starts the moment those vows r taken . What does 9 yrs or 30 yrs have to do with common knowledge of what a marraige is all about ? No , I absolutely refuse to accept the argument here that each one's conception of maraige is 'subjective' . 😆😆😆 Those kind of answers by Vaibhav will be very 'convenient' . Even the law grants divorce based on certain common expectations from a 'marraige' . For instance , a divorce is granted if its accepted in court that the marraige is unconsummated . WHY ? Coz it is socially and legally agreed to that Marraige does entail consummation , children , provision . If either of the 3 factors is not there , divorce is granted . Yes the children factor is not mandatory IF both parties agree to it . But even if ONE wants it and other refuses , he or she CAN apply for divorce .

But I don't wanna digress 😆 my point is this ...irrespective of the number of years for which u have married , the ultimate REALISATION that THis is what a maraige is all about is what is very important in a human being ...I don't see it in Vaibhav . I can fully understand that he decides NOT to physically consummate yet as he is uncomfortable with Devki right now etc ...But I do NOT see any realisation in him that somewhere , sometime , it HAS to be contemplated . He has happily accepted this arrangement as ETERNAL . Lets be wonderful DOSTS for life is his complacent attitude . And that naive girl has gone along with it ...but things have changed for her , she will soon realise the emptiness of what she was offered and what she accepted . Of course she has option of walking out , but this does not excuse V in my eyes for the eternal nonsense he propogates as marraige .

And so I fully relate to his brother Sid who tells him , I may be younger than u but I know MORE about marraige . It ain't a joke . I really do not see any flawed logic there . Its a very simple logic...jamta hai to shaadi karo , nah toh guts dikhao aur seperate ho jao . Ye jo chal raha hai , woh na shadi hai na dosti ...ekdum MESS hai .😆 Shaadi ka mazaak mat banao yeh kehkar ki This is the Shaadi WE comprehend . It is hypocrisy . Shaadi ki hai , toh nibhao . Varna apne apne raaste jao . This goes for D too .

Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 13 years ago

Quote

simran777

@simran777

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#28

@All above...⭐️A-mazing thought provoking pointz, by All above, 2 ponder upon...as a certain vital validity felt here n there in all said above...

Having not seen the show in itz entirety, what i say doesn't hold much value...par here's wat i feel from wat ive seen..

i particularly agree w/ the point that a sacred vow of commitment isn't just broken by the mere physical, but a purity of the mind must be attained as well...as matterz of the <3 r subtle n thus any affairs outside a marriage by our force of nature aren't accepted...

But sorta blocking the marriage aspect i may come off foolish in saying taht a part of me somehow understandingly admires Vaibhavji..

I don't like nor condone this Sabina Coma he's in, but i'd actually also be disappointed if he jumped in n outta love like a hop-scotch game, which is the norm of today...as the saying goes~stronger they are, harder they fall~which's exactly wat happen'd here n in this case, Love wasn't treated like some shrewd business by him n nor is it by Devki...we're seeing followers of the heart over mind ironically in these "business people"

See...Getting what you love is Success, Loving what you get is Compromise, Loving whether you get it or not is True Love, and loving even after being sure you wont get it is Pure LOVE!! So, i'm kinda seeing that code of Chivalry in it's true essence in both Vaibhavji n Devki...

Right now despite the betrayal n lack of Sabina reciprocation we're seeing Vaibhavji's character of Loyalty, but just imagine this very same character when later fallen in love with Devki where the love WILL be reciprocated!!!! ufff just imagine n await the heavenly kodak moment as sabar ka phal meetha hota hai...then n there these two can blossom a new beginning...a new start of Life...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9VOxvIZkps

~~I MUST say though all this stuffz is much easier seen in a show 2 comment on...think it must feel hella hard 2 go thru in real life na..