Hassled, but helpless
Despite efforts by the authorities to curb eve-teasing, the menace continues. PRINCE FREDERICK surveys the scene. |
IN1998, Sarika Shah, a student of Ethiraj College in Chennai, fell victim to eve-teasing in the vicinity of her college; she was manhandled and the injuries she sustained proved fatal. Her untimely death was made more poignant because it happened to be on July 23, her birthday. Months later, 32-year-old Durga, was killed when half-a-dozen men in an autorickshaw callously rammed her. A year ago, Amutha, a college student hailing from Asaripallam in Kanyakumari district took her life following an incident of eve-teasing.
Only a few months earlier, there had been a furore in the district over an incident in which two sisters, Sabitha and Saritha, were victims of an acid attack. Preethi, from Ambikapur in Madhya Pradesh, was run over by a jeep carrying her tormentors. In Calcutta, Rekha Choudhury, a basketball player, with an enviable standing in the national circuit, was tied to a vehicle and dragged. She sustained serious injuries, but survived the attack. There were a couple of incidents reported from Mumbai in which the victims were thrown out of moving trains.
This is by no means an exhaustive list of the victims of eve-teasing in the country. There are many more attacks, killings and suicides that can be cited. And to our shame, these continue unabated.
Only last month, a girl was assaulted at the Sathyam Theatre Complex. Nirmala was assaulted when she took exception to the obscene remarks directed at her by a group of college youths. The bystanders were mute spectators to the attack. If you think it is only the uncivilised youth who indulge in eve-teasing, this case would dispel the misconception. The boys involved were from respectable families. A few days ago, a Std. IX student, Surya, of Pudukottai, walked over the brink, as she was stung to the quick by a youth's dogged presence and obscene pronouncements.
Where is teasing or jest in all this? Ask Sarika Shah's parents and they will not say their daughter was teased, but brutally killed. It is a mystery why we are yet to wake up to the inaccuracy of the term eve-teasing. Any argument to continue with it as an appellation for the terror that women are subjected to, should indeed be untenable. Eve-teasing is a term that highlights the offender's perception of the act; and by continuing to use it, we are supporting the eve-teaser, unwittingly though. It is time we painted this menace in the dark colours that it deserves. To start with, we could coin a new name for it.
Far too often, we find the victim on the wrong side of the stick. If we were to go into the aetiology of eve-teasing, as propounded by so-called analysts of the phenomenon, it would seem ludicrous, if not nauseating ' "With the way she dressed she had it coming," "She would have encouraged the boys" and "Boys will be boys, girls have to be discreet". The "behavioural scientists" are in a sense in cahoots with eve-teasers as they seem to be condoning their crimes. How would they explain the fact that hell-raisers on the road knock the living daylights out of a motorist for no other reason than the fact that she is a woman. And we know only too well that many of these victims are clad in saris or churidhars, and not in skin-hugging, skimpy outfits.
The case of P.E. Usha epitomises societal attitude to victims of sexual assault and eve-teasing.
An employee of Calicut University, she was sexually assaulted on a bus. Her determination to put the man in the dock cost her dearly. Her husband abandoned her. Her colleagues at the university did whatever they could to prevent her from coming to the office.
People around started to regard her with disgust. Some tarnished her character, by labelling her a woman of easy virtue.
Within days of Sarika Shah's mortal remains being interred, hundreds were put behind bars on charges of eve-teasing. In no time, the White Brigades were formed. Policemen were posted near women's colleges and schools. And within months, the State Government enacted the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Eve-Teasing Act, 1998.
The upshot of it all is that there have indeed been efforts to curb the menace. But despite these measures, eve-teasers continue to strike with impunity.
Though the Sarika Shah case is an analogue of the Pon Navarasu case, one is left with the feeling that the former has not given as much fillip to the anti eve-teasing crusade, as the latter has to the anti-ragging campaign.
While we seem to have contained ragging, the horror of eve-teasing seems to continue. One is impelled to look upon the crackdowns as knee-jerk reactions. It takes the death of a Sarika to galvanise the enforcement agencies into action. Who next?
In all fairness, it has to be admitted that the challenges posed by eve-teasing are far more than those that ragging throws up. Ragging, by and large, is confined to the premises of educational institutions and generally rears its head only in the beginning of an academic year.