Changed stance on Intimacy? MOD Note. Pg. 49

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

shinz

@shinz

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#11

exaclty...the thing is that couples do get intimate and i have no problems with that...and intimacy depends on the couple so i have no comments on how it is potrayed on who...!!
the thing is that when it is unacceptable for onecouple that why is it all worshipping like for the other one..!!
agreed...that we ahve democratic rights and have a right to opinion and speech.....to express our views...but why instable views.....!
giving moral and ethical lectures on youthness saying that its POV..and then again totally changing track for the same thing..!!
its may i say so quite hypocritical and doubly standard-y..!!

if u come out and say that since the intimacy is for them whom i like..i m fine with it..cause that IS a POV...but saying that intimacy itself is wrong for youth shows and then saying something else now..!!
certainly unaaceptable..!

Quote

PureBliss

@PureBliss

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: truth_wins

Well mayur had that moments when there was need of them to talk to each other and solve their misunderstandings but no they were busy being hawt this was the reason I was against that sequence, sajan according to me have loads of bonding and understanding between them.I wouldn't had mind the MN sequence if they had some understanding or bonding between them which according to me they don't.

I justified myself,don't know about the other sajan fans and why they disliked it.

MN were immature? 😲 They had already gone through so much then...... they had a fight... they almost breaked up. M was going back again the next day and HOW can u expect them not to do that?

S wasn't going anywhere. They all are doing all that when Bauji trustes G so much. 😕

No offence pls!

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

PureBliss

@PureBliss

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: shinz
exaclty...the thing is that couples do get intimate and i have no problems with that...and intimacy depends on the couple so i have no comments on how it is potrayed on who...!!
the thing is that when it is unacceptable for onecouple that why is it all worshipping like for the other one..!!
agreed...that we ahve democratic rights and have a right to opinion and speech.....to express our views...but why instable views.....!
giving moral and ethical lectures on youthness saying that its POV..and then again totally changing track for the same thing..!!
its may i say so quite hypocritical and doubly standard-y..!!

if u come out and say that since the intimacy is for them whom i like..i m fine with it..cause that IS a POV...but saying that intimacy itself is wrong for youth shows and then saying something else now..!!
certainly unaaceptable..!

well said 👏

Quote

Annie

@annie07

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 15 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: truth_wins

Well mayur had that moments when there was need of them to talk to each other and solve their misunderstandings but no they were busy being hawt this was the reason I was against that sequence, sajan according to me have loads of bonding and understanding between them.I wouldn't had mind the MN sequence if they had some understanding or bonding between them which according to me they don't.

I justified myself,don't know about the other sajan fans and why they disliked it.

Justifiied.............really?

MN did talk, and if u remember, they just patched up after a long misunderstanding..............and were to separate again next day for dnt knw how long..........

They were talking and dancing before being caught up in the moment..........and even then Mayank was a gentleman to ask if its right to go ahead.............

As for SG understanding and bonding........well such PURE love is beyond my understanding so i leave that to experts, but if desired i can give my comments on yday's epi 2.............

Quote

Divya

@myownarea

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 15 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: truth_wins

Well mayur had that moments when there was need of them to talk to each other and solve their misunderstandings but no they were busy being hawt this was the reason I was against that sequence, sajan according to me have loads of bonding and understanding between them.I wouldn't had mind the MN sequence if they had some understanding or bonding between them which according to me they don't.

I justified myself,don't know about the other sajan fans and why they disliked it.

I totally agree with your reasoning here, it makes perfect sense for you to have such a reason and feel the way you do, but then again my question was more towards people who thought the very idea of passion for youth was abhorable :) now suddenly not so much?

Quote

shama

@Angry_Bird

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

#16

i also want to know...
i find d people who were totally against MaYUr passionate scne are calling SG one is nt passionate bt pure....

Quote

shinz

@shinz

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: truth_wins
Well mayur had that moments when there was need of them to talk to each other and solve their misunderstandings but no they were busy being hawt this was the reason I was against that sequence, sajan according to me have loads of bonding and understanding between them.I wouldn't had mind the MN sequence if they had some understanding or bonding between them which according to me they don't.

I justified myself,don't know about the other sajan fans and why they disliked it.

wonderful..!!!
u have raised a brilliant point..!
u mean to say that sajan have the understanding to do IT...and thats why it was acceptable...that measn sajan did it delibrately....cause there was nothing left for them to talk..!! thats why they decided that we have bonded well...so lets kiss now..!

and coming to mayur...u say that mayur shuld have talked..but became hawwttt...matlab they kissed cause of the moment..!! and thats wrong...!
oh i get it...they shuld have planned it properly like sajan and then done it..! right..!!!
thats totally acceptable..! 😆

Edited by shinz - 15 years ago

Quote

Amina

@AnnaJaay

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: cutie_nikki

MN were immature? 😲 They had already gone through so much then...... they had a fight... they almost breaked up. M was going back again the next day and HOW can u expect them not to do that?

S wasn't going anywhere. They all are doing all that when Bauji trustes G so much. 😕

No offence pls!

well said nikki..seriouslyy all this hypocrisyy is getn on my nerves! pathetic!.x

Quote

mads

@mads

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: cutie_nikki

MN were immature? 😲 They had already gone through so much then...... they had a fight... they almost breaked up. M was going back again the next day and HOW can u expect them not to do that?

S wasn't going anywhere. They all are doing all that when Bauji trustes G so much. 😕

No offence pls!

k jus to tell u a slight difference here since u hav raised that point -

in morena, when Sam was abt to leave forever ... ( mind u, SG were in love then ) ... the SaJan scene on the terrace is EXACTLY the same situation that MN were in, when Mayank was abt to leave mumbai ... but SaJan ... decided to TALK...to communicate what they fel at tht moment ...and THAT very much indicated what their desires were at tht moment ... even when sam was abt t leave morena ... gunjan didnt even kno whether she wil see him again or not ... and what do they decide to do? they talk..they discuss...they realise tht their love is THE BIGGEST thing that they hav ever had..and for tht they shud b happy...then it doesnt matter whether they stay together or not...ALL that matters is what they feel for each other in their hearts...and tht wil automatically keep them together even when they are apart ...

cut to MN in the same situation...nupur knows mayank is going away ..leaving mumbai .. and what do they do?