Farhad AT #2 Finally a Devar - Page 122

Originally posted by: SRKian

It won't be the first time in itv to have a couple in live-in. I think arnav from ipk was in a live in and there is one show called maa I think on sony tv where the couple was in live in too.

For sunkeer I won't mins either as long as they don't spoil these characters. Although I do think it will be interesting to see how keerti manages to get rid off his commitment issues.

I'm personally believe in the institution of marriage.Living in isn't for me😳 But never judge anyone who prefers living in. I'm a firm believer of live and let live. 😳

oh wow, I did not know this... how surprising..

I am also curious to see how this all will evolve..

"I personally believe in the institution of marriage"

See.. I do too.. or perhaps I romanticize it.. but I agree to your words.. I see nothing wrong with live-in..

I am just greedy to wear the dresses, have the party and wedding cake 🤣🤣

we are so connected.. First Farag Love now Live and let live..

Originally posted by: SRKian

Yeah saw that🤣 looks more of himu and less of farhad😭😆 I wanna see farhad ka shirtless scenes🙈😆

🤣

what is this Ani? never satisfied.. be happy with some chest pics.. the boy made an effort for you..
I think only RR will be shirtless in MHRW..

by the way.. speaking of chest.. today someone sent me pics of Harish/Krishna Kaurav...

that chest alone.. it is a big as my pillows.. I want to plant my head on that chest..! but.. he has to keep on shaving/waxing 🤣🤣 yes yes say it.. what is this Rishu? never satisfied? 😆

hello Sweet Bee,

how are you my dear?

Most here would choose marriage over live-in I see.. If I would have that choice ever, I too would choose for a wedding with my close ones, have a party (not huge) and spend the money on us two.

You menioned (and others) Live-in has a casual element in it, which is true perhaps.. but I feel sometimes it is a prejudice.. In general people think this, but people who are in live-in relationship dont play (daily) with this thought that they have an easy way out. There is just as much commitment actually (sometimes even more).. I have seen it in real life examples.. the commitment does appear or increase by taking the vows alone or the 7 rounds etc. I would choose it, purely because it fits the romantic picture I have.. Because I am used of that in my family etc. But I have seen lots of marriages failing too. Divorce is that (legally less) easy way out too..

Interesting topic.. Some need to feel and know mentally that they are not caged. This knowledge gives them more motivation to stay committed..

All in all, thank you for being open minded and sharing your thoughts..

The SunKeer scenarios you have described make me enthusiastic. I hope the plan does not change and they stick to this couple.

Originally posted by: Bee222

I believe in the foundation of marriage. If I'm gonna fall for anyone, I need to trust them first... and for that, I need that commitment. Live-in has a casual element in it, and I can see why some people are drawn to it. Life is meant to be lived and enjoyed, after all.. where's the fun in staying bogged down? 😆 But for me, there's a beauty in commitment, in promising to put in the efforts for a person, no matter how difficult it gets. Imo live-in keeps that exit option a little too accessible, it's like you can call it quits at the first signs of turbulence. I'm not saying you should never call it quits, of course there are marriages that get too much to bear, and no one should ever feel burdened to stay on in a toxic or unhappy relationship. But if you're committed, you will try your very best before giving up on it — and that's an assurance I need from my partner ❤️

As for others, I'm not one to judge. Everyone has a right to live their own lives the way they want. As long as both parties are consenting individuals, I see nothing wrong or questionable there. I'm actually interested to see how it goes for Sunny and Keerti. Either way is fine by me, but I do think their relationship will have a focus on Sunny's commitment issues, and the arc will only finish with him popping the question himself. As for Keerti, she has said that she's chosen him and will spend her life with him no matter what. I wanna see if she really means those words. If Sunny straightaway refuses to marry her ever, will she still choose to remain in this relationship? Will she not feel like her wishes are being thoughtlessly ignored? Also Raghav's disapproval of Sunny — will it weaken her resolve or make her more determined to stand by Sunny? All interesting arcs to discover...

Originally posted by: SRKian

What happened to the we miss you harish post?

😆🤗

Ani, thank you for raising this very important life and death topic! 😆

well what happened?

1. Mihika created some picture in picture collage - beautiful - blueish colors, Harish looking all hot and cool at the same time.
2. Krishna saw it and shared it on his story too. Himanshu too. He also wrote "Miss you Bhai" something like that (True Love).
3. I still miss Harish!!!!!!!
4. Surprise on Harish is coming up soon.. stay tuned..!

I accept the name Pallavi as long as I get the soft, nice, romantic Raghav 🤣

I think of myself as a balance between romantic and practical. My heart likes romance, my mind tells me that to live in this world, there has to be level of being practical, yet I do not believe being practical in love hence I've always maintained that love and marriage are two different things. You can love with all your heart, no boundaries, no societal pressures, no fear of breakups because there's no breakup in love. That is my romantic side. On the flip side, marriage is an arrangement. As a child I believed marriages are made in heaven (bollywood movies really spoil us) but very soon later of course I understood marriage as an arrangement, tried to come to terms with it and that is where my practical side comes in. But I'm not married yet 😆

Definitely not misunderstanding you at all. Marriages break, and they break bad. Children suffer and it's a mess for them. Live-in's break, they too break bad. If there are children in that relationship, they suffer equally. Then what is the difference between marriage and live in? I'd say, and I'm being practical pushing aside my wishful thinking of everyone being able to live a life they want, that it's society and legal acceptance of the off springs. I don't live in India but belong to an Indian community where it all boils down to social acceptance and legality. That is the only difference. Our social system has not yet made progress to address the pain from broken marriages or broken relationships so I don't really have any answer to the question of pain from both arrangements. Unhappy marriages make up a good percentage of marriages, we've all probably seen them around us. I personally feel that divorce is a life saver, though painful. In live in there is no divorce so people do walk out easily but then, is there a cure for a broken heart? Not so easy after all when it comes to matters of the heart.

Another issue is that our current society has not yet made a directly proportional social progress to the heightened growth in other fields, hence there is a general imbalance in ideologies i.e. modern vs traditional thinking. After spending years debating over this system I found that our current civilization, economic development and the general progress in this world, including urbanization, stands on two pillars. The institution of marriage and toilets (without toilets, cities would not exist). Change will be slow, hard and the transition will be the worst phase. I believe we are currently in the transition stage.

I'd sincerely wish for a world where our personal choice is respected because marriage is definitely a society imposed system and has nothing to do with the heart. But our world has not yet fully grasped the concept of choice in its entirety hence live in is still looked down upon not because it's wrong but because people fear that the institution of marriage will break and society will find a severe imbalance. Then again, many people are not in the position to make a choice as they're not financially independent so for them, legality and assurance of commitment plays a huge factor.

So if my mind is answering, marriage it is. If my heart is answering, I really don't care about any of the two. The balance of the two tilts towards the mind 😆

Lastly if Sunny suggests a live in with kirti, I'd like someone maybe Raghav to bring in this debate and use some of our content here. It takes minutes to write all this 🤣The debate and buzz will be so worth it.

Originally posted by: RishuDarling

Hi Pallavi.. uhmm I mean dear Viewpoint 😆 thanks for the lecture.. 🤣

I see you are very romantic and practical too 😉

Thank you for sharing your opinion on marriage vs live-in relationships, and I LOVE you all for respecting each others opinions on this topic. I too have respect whatever the choice is in this matter. What works for me might not work for you.

I have highlighted one section which I would like to comment on. See, I think you have a point there but the flip side of the coin is that I see around me that some marriages fail just as easy.. A divorce might take slightly longer but it people do opt for it quite often. Or, they stay unhappily married.

please do not misunderstand me, honestly.. for me I dont care or mind at all whatever the choice is, but it must be YOUR choice. you are the one has to feel good with it. marriage or live-in, I think when the first thrill and buzz of love wears out, what you need is commitment. Make a choice and commit to each other to stay together. also, with children, rights and all.. perhaps it depends also where on the globe you live, what the law of that country has decided.. where I live, there is not so much difference between two in terms of legal rights.

Text in blue, I have some doubts (and you too say the same) whether this happens only in live-in.. See the example of Sunny.. his parents were married and something was apparently not good.

I want SunKeer to get married and live happily ever after and have 10 kids or something.

Though, just for the innovative refreshing part in ITV I would not mind to have another couple be in a live-in relationship together. Imagine the buzz, drama and discussions on that. Not just on forum but talkshows too.

By the way, my opinion is live and let live. Whatever you choose, just be ok and happy with that. And when the going gets tough, dont give up.. It is a continuous work to be / stay in a good equal relationship. Commitment is key I think.

You want my Raghav....??? 😡 well you have guts.. and I am scared cat.. so ok.. go on then.. but bring him back to me in one piece ☺️😆

I am just impressed by the way you express your thoughts (on this subject).

And I can only say that I AGREE, I AGREE & I AGREE SOMEMORE 😃😆

long post you have made.. long quote in which I have only highlighted one or two lines.

SunKeer - Raghav - that would be so interesting and I hope your points will be noticed.

Frankly, I enjoyed all the responses on this topic.

Thank you everyone for your replies. I throw Corona-proof kisses to you all.. Do you feel the love?

Originally posted by: Viewpoint

Then what is the difference between marriage and live in? I'd say, and I'm being practical pushing aside my wishful thinking of everyone being able to live a life they want, that it's society and legal acceptance of the off springs. I don't live in India but belong to an Indian community where it all boils down to social acceptance and legality. That is the only difference. Our social system has not yet made progress to address the pain from broken marriages or broken relationships so I don't really have any answer to the question of pain from both arrangements. Unhappy marriages make up a good percentage of marriages, we've all probably seen them around us. I personally feel that divorce is a life saver, though painful. In live in there is no divorce so people do walk out easily but then, is there a cure for a broken heart? Not so easy after all when it comes to matters of the heart.

Another issue is that our current society has not yet made a directly proportional social progress to the heightened growth in other fields, hence there is a general imbalance in ideologies i.e. modern vs traditional thinking. After spending years debating over this system I found that our current civilization, economic development and the general progress in this world, including urbanization, stands on two pillars. The institution of marriage and toilets (without toilets, cities would not exist). Change will be slow, hard and the transition will be the worst phase. I believe we are currently in the transition stage.

I'd sincerely wish for a world where our personal choice is respected because marriage is definitely a society imposed system and has nothing to do with the heart. But our world has not yet fully grasped the concept of choice in its entirety hence live in is still looked down upon not because it's wrong but because people fear that the institution of marriage will break and society will find a severe imbalance. Then again, many people are not in the position to make a choice as they're not financially independent so for them, legality and assurance of commitment plays a huge factor.

So if my mind is answering, marriage it is. If my heart is answering, I really don't care about any of the two. The balance of the two tilts towards the mind 😆

Lastly if Sunny suggests a live in with kirti, I'd like someone maybe Raghav to bring in this debate and use some of our content here. It takes minutes to write all this 🤣The debate and buzz will be so worth it.

AT is ready. Plz shift there