Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 8 - Page 41

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

35.2k

Users

10

Likes

1.5k

Frequent Posters

Mages thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456


Yeh toh Shaheera hi jaane


most of the time many don't understand🤣

naq5 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No one's version of correctness was Dharma. Neither of Duryodhan nor of Yudhishtir nor of anyone(not even Krishna if you ask me)

As we already said, Sahdev n Krishna had planned and deliberately the villages which were asked from him which they knew would never be given by Kauravas since those were strategic to their kingdom

Indraprasth was the capital of their erstwhile kingdom, if they became head of that region they could easily cause the start of a public uproar

Sonprasth area across Varnavrat, people might get emotional and they could easily get a public uproar started

Rest three were border areas (one towards Saurastra, other towards Panchal and third was border too), which means that Pandavas could get done an attack on Hastinapur and they wouldn't be able to protect.


Giving any one of these five would have meant huge risk to their sovereignty, and they asked for all five.


Krishna and Sahdev knew that Duryodhan wouldn't accept this and hence their wish for the war would be fulfilled, but then the blame of the war would go to Kauravas (who had actually won the bet and were therefore till then right in Their stance for public)

wasnt that thing debatable that they won the bet or not.?

indraprastha was pandavas even before dyut. dury dint have an issue with it then regarding it being a strategic point.

AninditaB thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Mages


most of the time many don't understand🤣

🤣

AninditaB thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Yes they have reduced Balram to caricature. BB is such a good actor they are completely wasting him.

I hope they don't show Duryodhan fooling him n he getting fooled easily. Their introduction scene was impressive and filled with mutual respect. Hopefully they continue that way


Bold : yahi hoga

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: naq5

yudi bheem n arjun wouldnt have gone for war had dury given them their kingdom back or agreed with peace treaty. The dyut was to win indraprastha/ humiliate pandavas draupadi. if there was no war there was no guarantee dury wouldnt have attempted again to get those lands back either through war or by other means.

@Bold add Nakul to that list. That's exactly why I said that Sahdev was the best


The Dyut was only to humiliate Pandavas and Yudhishtir like Duryodhan had felt humiliated at Indraprasth. The game was organised in Yudhishtir's honour for he had completed the Rajsuya successfully. Lot of guests were present there, now if Yudhishtir lost the dice game pathetically it would have become a running joke about Yudhishtir and Duryodhan would have felt avenged.

But Yudhishtir held his ego high and continued playing. As Chhiillli said he might have thought that after a few games, the elders in the court would ask Dury to deliberately lose and he could go out of the court with his head high after the token win.

Obviously the elders weren't at all interested in this they let the game continue and eventually Yudhishtir lost his kingdom, brothers and finally himself. Now definitely Duryodhan or the Chandal Chaukdi wouldn't have even anticipated that Yudhishtir would act so foolishly. So when they are getting more than they expected why not take it.


At the time of Shanti Parva, Pandavas were at wrong they failed to properly fulfil the conditions of the bet so actually

Now if Duryodhan was actually offered some deal which was not as bad as the one offered, he might have accepted it and would have never tried to fight them. I mean to think of it Pandavas were his biggest enemies and they being reduced to a PrantPramukh under his domination, what better thing for him to humiliate his enemies.


It was only Sahdev n Krishna who caused or helped the cause

Mages thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago

https://twitter.com/chirpy_toree/status/1290695878026567682?s=20


look what i found 13 names of arjun

interesting info

no wonder shrutakarma has a unique name so does abhimanyu their papa has so many unique names

Edited by Mages - 5 years ago
FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: naq5

wasnt that thing debatable that they won the bet or not.?

indraprastha was pandavas even before dyut. dury dint have an issue with it then regarding it being a strategic point.

It was debatable on whether or not they had won the bet, but in royal chambers Duryodhan's case would have been strong. Pandavas did have few points in their support but not strong enough to get public support


Indraprasth was another kingdom at the time of prior Dyut Sabha, kind of a vassal or probably subsidiary to Hastinapur (Prior to Rajsuya). Yudhishtir was the king there, people had gone there to stay leaving other parts of the kingdom. Despite personal enimity this was a mutually cordial set up


Post DyutSabha, it was a different condition, Indraprasth was now a city under Hastinapur kingdom, and Yudhishtir/any Pandav would have been like a cityhead of Indraprasth, their relation was much worsened by now, the public would still have memories of 13 years prior injustice, if they revolted against their king with the help of city head it would be a mass uprising against Hastinapur empire that's a completely different situation

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Mages

https://twitter.com/chirpy_toree/status/1290695878026567682?s=20


look what i found 13 names of arjun

interesting info

no wonder shrutakarma has a unique name so does abhimanyu their papa has so many unique names

Parth is missing from the list that's the most common one. Gandeya is another name (the bearer of Gandeev)

Aside I think Vijaya is the the name of Karna because his bow was named Vijay


Kya log the dhanush ko bhi naam dete the

Mages thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Parth is missing from the list that's the most common one. Gandeya is another name (the bearer of Gandeev)

Aside I think Vijaya is the the name of Karna because his bow was named Vijay


Kya log the dhanush ko bhi naam dete the


wow dwarpa yug....one person has so many names

parth is mention as partha there

Edited by Mages - 5 years ago
FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Then I will feel bad.

I liked Dury Balram relation in BRC, Dury started with an intention to fool Balram but later got genuinely fond of him.


Although few, but their scenes were beautiful.

(Although off screen Puneet sir ki wajah se Balram-(dont know his name) ka role kat Gaya tha. He was to play Bheem, but when the physiques were compared Bheem didn't match Duryodhan at all to unse Bheem ka role lekar Balram de Diya🤣


By the way Krip(RK Dury) BB n Sumedh se kitna bada lagta hai, when he calls them Bhrata to bahut funny sound hota hai

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".