Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 7 - Page 82

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Some people even make Karna the sixth Pandava just to ship with Draupadi🤢

eeewwww...thats gross

karna is suryaputra not pandavas even though he is elder bro of pandavas

how people ship karna-draupadi...they have no angle except that he was a monster who insulted draupadi and insitgate the disrobing incident🤮🤮

Originally posted by: Mages

eeewwww...thats gross

karna is suryaputra not pandavas even though he is elder bro of pandavas

how people ship karna-draupadi...they have no angle except that he was a monster who insulted draupadi and insitgate the disrobing incident🤮🤮

🤢

Originally posted by: Mages

the problem why so many fiction coming out becos noone knows what actually happened in dwarpa yug thus there are so many interpretations folklore and fictional writing...

karna-draupadi love angle was heights

Sorry mages

I don't think any retelling tells karn draupadi love story .

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Some people even make Karna the sixth Pandava just to ship with Draupadi🤢

Draupadi is termed as sixth pandav herself not karn.

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Draupadi is termed as sixth pandav herself not karn.

Yeah. But some people make him sixth Pandava so that he could marry her 🤢🤢🤢

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Can I ask something ? Don't take it otherwise.

Why u think upandavas were not draupadi's kids ?

See I don't believe karn at all , he can say anything to insult draupadi.

If someone had said that then I would have thought

Initially drishtdumya took upandavas to panchal , when they shifted to dwarka is not known. When Pandavas were leaving 4 exile. Why will drishtdumya take upandavas to panchal if they were not his sister kids.

Not because of Karna's speeches. Those are completely irrelevant to understand. The reasons are different. And yes the reasons are not conclusive they are just inferred you could have different opinions

1) The birth of kids are not mentioned excluding a passing a reference. While the birth of Abhimanyu is given so much importance. At least the birth of Prativindhya should have been celebrated afterall he was the son of a king

2) The son of Abhimanyu is considered the only living heir

3) Yudhishtir didn't stake Prativindhya in the game and said he isn't left with anything and no one objects. Couldn't have happened unless either Prativindhya didn't exist or was given to someone and hence Yudi didn't have rights on him anymore

4) They don't do much in the war. The best performance of theirs was defeating some lower Kauravas, Karna's son apparently defeated all five of them in a one to five combat, that's so unlikely for Pandavas sons. Aside mostly they attacked in unison. Why would they do so? That's how characters act in stories not how soldiers fight in war.

5) Why would Ashwathama kill them? He wasn't confused as we have checked. He knew that it were Uppandavas that he was killing. No reason to do so, he had issues with Dhristhdhyum why would he hold against children of Pandavas (even they didn't do anything to Ashwathama)

The entire track, everything which is mentioned about them seems an added plot. So I think they weren't real or they were simply kids of lower wives who didn't do much but were there in the war and got killed ordinarily

If they weren't real the Dhristhdhyum taking them is also an interpolation

If they were real n kids of lower wives, maybe they were close to Draupadi, Dhristhdhyum took them for the same reason why later Dwarika had them, because their maternal homes weren't rich enough to give them royal upbringing or training

Originally posted by: Mages

the problem why so many fiction coming out becos noone knows what actually happened in dwarpa yug thus there are so many interpretations folklore and fictional writing...

karna-draupadi love angle was heights

I still accepted that.

But Duryodhan Subhadra love was mount Everest

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

I can bet anyone on this forum , try to write anything wrong for sita in d creative liberty , I promise u , after this u will not able to write anything wrong for any mythological character. Coz sita fans don't give right to anyone to insult her.

Some years earlier their was dance show use to come on colors. A couple tried to portray sita"s abduction by raavan in a wrong way. That couple face legal problem .

Hona draupadi ke saath bhi yahi chaiye , ek do ke saath ko lesson milega , phir koi kuch bhi galat draupadi ke baare main likhne ki himmat nhi karenge.

People consider Seeta as Goddess but not Draupadi so they accept distortions for her

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

I searched for bheem there I found people say sarvang participated & survived d war.

No idea but I have checked the epic. He isn't mentioned as a participant. Same with the sons of Karenumati, Vijaya etc.

Originally posted by: Mages

thats why i believe draupadi-pandavas had daughters only suthanu mention becos she married krishna's son

other daughters are protected and exist but did not had a role

They might have existed and not mentioned but definitely not because they are protected, but only because the Dwapar Yug people were filled with misogyny to actually specify about daughters