Originally posted by: TheWatcher
If philosophy has to be used - the whole Mahabharata can be explained in a line or two - ' It was all Krishna's plan and his 'Mahima' ', end of story.
But we don't do that do we?. Personally when I discuss battles - I don't like to pay attention devotee and God relationship, everything can be explained by Arjuna's devotee statues and Krishna's God status because that would explain every rescue of Arjuna easily but that would not explain logical questions.
Okay... @The Watcher, I clearly told that I responded to Diala's post where she mentioned that Arjun can feel a little bad for taking a third party help. My response was to that keeping aside other so called philosophical points.
Not every charioteer in the world could sink the whole chariot - which was made of solid gold - into the earth six cubits.I would have agreed that it was skill only if the version said that Krishna made the horses kneel, but it doesn't say that, it clearly says Krishna sunk the chariot six cubits. ( This is a part of your own post which you made a few pages back)
So what is your logical explanation to this @red??. You already discounted the skill factor of Krishna here. The only thing I can think of is, either he is divine or he has some extraordinary powers (can logic accept this). Pls, this is not to challenge you or anything, if you have any other theory, I will gladly accept it.
And I am not even talking about the posts of Sabhayata,, where in almost every post of hers she mentioned the divinity of Krishna to make her point & you pressed the like button too & some your friends doing the same. So Krishna's divinity & his powers is used as a point to justify your points, but those who have opposing views can't do the same?? So are there 2 sets of rules for two people here??😕
Edited by Sharanya09 - 11 years ago