Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 16 - Page 39

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

92.5k

Users

79

Likes

4.8k

Frequent Posters

...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Sharanya09



Why should Arjuna feel bad if Krishna helped him😲 It is not mentioned even in the epic that Arjuna felt bad. It is not some ego game which we kalyugi's make it out as. So what is the shame if god himself protected his devotee.


I wish I can redirect this question to our dear CVs 😆
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Arijit007

dia, we call that chal fate,


If so, every chal has to be called fate.. you agree?
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Sabhayata


now days i don't even know if CV's are BWing or WWing


I am sure they attempt to whitewash and end up in flat bleaching with no features visible at all..
997935 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: ...Diala...


I am sure they attempt to whitewash and end up in flat bleaching with no features visible at all..


this is epic...🤣
Sharanya09 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

If philosophy has to be used - the whole Mahabharata can be explained in a line or two - ' It was all Krishna's plan and his 'Mahima' ', end of story.

But we don't do that do we?. Personally when I discuss battles - I don't like to pay attention devotee and God relationship, everything can be explained by Arjuna's devotee statues and Krishna's God status because that would explain every rescue of Arjuna easily but that would not explain logical questions.





Okay... @The Watcher, I clearly told that I responded to Diala's post where she mentioned that Arjun can feel a little bad for taking a third party help. My response was to that keeping aside other so called philosophical points.

Not every charioteer in the world could sink the whole chariot - which was made of solid gold - into the earth six cubits.I would have agreed that it was skill only if the version said that Krishna made the horses kneel, but it doesn't say that, it clearly says Krishna sunk the chariot six cubits. ( This is a part of your own post which you made a few pages back)

So what is your logical explanation to this @red??. You already discounted the skill factor of Krishna here. The only thing I can think of is, either he is divine or he has some extraordinary powers (can logic accept this). Pls, this is not to challenge you or anything, if you have any other theory, I will gladly accept it.

And I am not even talking about the posts of Sabhayata,, where in almost every post of hers she mentioned the divinity of Krishna to make her point & you pressed the like button too & some your friends doing the same. So Krishna's divinity & his powers is used as a point to justify your points, but those who have opposing views can't do the same?? So are there 2 sets of rules for two people here??😕



Edited by Sharanya09 - 11 years ago
Sharanya09 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Devashree & Sharanya - No offense or disagreement at all with your philosophy.. personally speaking, if I win an award and someone calls it God's Grace or Good Luck, I will feel like to give them a tight hard slap.. 😆 This is a human tendency that can be expected from Arjun and certainly from ⭐️Arjun.. That is what I meant in my previous post..



I did not take offence at all dear. We are all having a healthy discussion.😛

Oh yes you are right. if I win an award and someone calls it God's Grace or Good Luck, I will feel like to give them a tight hard slap... So isn't that what I exactly mentioned in my first response to you...that Arjun earned his protection, luck or grace or whatever you would like to call it ( I also mentioned that, let us forget that Krishna is a god for a moment) So where is the disagreement then??


Sharanya09 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: ...Diala...


I wish I can redirect this question to our dear CVs 😆




You are right, lets direct it to the cvs. My response was to your assumption

Ps: I will continue the discussion tomorrow for any points raised. Have to sleep. Too late




TheWatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
I never questioned Krishna's divinity, the point raised was explaining Krishna interference by raising the God - Devotee angle, it is not that simple.
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Sharanya09


You are right, lets direct it to the cvs. My response was to your assumption


But I dint make any assumption about Arjuna.. I said may or may not.. 😊 I was just certain about ⭐️Arjuna if the nagastra episode happens, based on his history of emotions
Arijit007 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
arjun will ask madhav, " madhav aap ne toh kahaa tha ke aap chal nahi karenge, toh yeh kya thaa?" and madhav will explain that.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".