CASE IN COURT 5.1.26
CASE IS DONE 6.11
Kartik celebrates New Year with his GF
Kartik Aryan Sympathy
No Sympathy For Hrithik
Happy 1st Anniversary Manvikians
Ikkis flops at the box office
SRK explains the actual meaning of most misunderstood word "Jihad"
Started Rewatching Jodha Akbar and addicted once again.Hoping for S2
Mahadev and Sons-Colors
Nache Nache Video Song - The Rajasaab
Originally posted by: Sabhayata
Thanks vrish for this
first of all what i want to say is Bhima you are awesome.Not only your thoughts are clear but are pretty logical as well.You go Bhima
Regarding dhrishtdyumna yes he did what was necessary but still it was a cowardly act and he deserves to be rebuked for it
But arjuna in no way should be rebuking dhrishtdyumna for what he did considering the unfair means arjuna himself used.Not only in case of bheeshma but even during jaydratha vadh he cuts of bhurivasa arm from behind and upon being rebuked gave lame excuse that it was his dharma to save satyaki so what he did was right.
ANd then when stayaki himself kill bhurivasa in the same way dhrishtdyuman killed drona arjuna and krishna dont do a thing to stop him neither do they rebuke him
before dhrishtdyumna arjuna should rebuke his dear student for killing burivasas like that
i can understand arjuna feeling bad for drona since drona was like a father to him but rebuking other warriors for using unfair means is something he just shouldn't do
Originally posted by: Sabhayata
In KMG at this moment it is also said that Bhima spares him which i dont understand logically how since bhima had no weapons at that time however CE (crtical edition) doesn't mention anything like this it only talks about karna sparing Bhima
You are forgetting that Bhima was a great wrestler as well. So even if deprived of weapons, he was fully capable of bashing up Karna unarmed. This of course assumes that Karna would have obliged him by fighting on his terms, which given Karna's characterization, he may have.So both did spare each other. I think the CE assumes that Bhima's physical superiority to Karna was moot b'cos Karna still wasn't totally disarmed, and so could have used his weapons on Bhima.
Originally posted by: Sabhayata
Compltelty agree vrish especially about ashwathama
Ashwi was no ordinary archer himself.Infact quiet a few times he defeated arjuna as well and i would say during the jaydratha vadh day did a much better job than karna in trying to stop arjuna.IN ⭐️bharat not only ashwi's character has been blackwashed even his skills have been blackwashed.Not sure how this ⭐️ashwi will release Narayan astra
some more tid bits about day 14 war
1)Bhima fought two duels with karna on day 14
first one he easily vanquished karna it was a very small duel .Bhima destroyed karna's chariot and karna got on vrishsena's chariot.Although for this particular duel its mentioned that karna was fighting mildly with Bhima
then there was a second much longer and fiercer duel with karna in which karna initially was fighting mildly but after seeing Bhima kill one of dury's brother's he fought with his full might but was still unable to stop Bhima
Bhima killed 20 sons of dhrit that day in front of karna,destroyed atleast 4 of karna's chariots and bows
however towards end of the end of the duel Karna gained an upper hand and destroyed Bhima chariot and all weapons he possessed. Bhima ran towards the feild where all elephants lying dead to impede karna's speed .Which is when karna says something to him and spares him
In KMG at this moment it is also said that Bhima spares him which i dont understand logically how since bhima had no weapons at that time however CE (crtical edition) doesn't mention anything like this it only talks about karna sparing Bhima
2)In any case Bhima;s this battle with karna is quiet awesome Bhima has an upper hand through majority of this duel and dhrit is actually praising Bhima throughout which is why i consider Bhima to be the second best archer in panadav army equal to abhimanyu and above satyaki
3)Another important encounter of this day was bhurvisas and satyaki in which stayaki is about to be killed but arjuna cuts of burvisas arm from behind.This act of deceit from arjuna really bother's me.Although he was forced to do this by krishna ji .Arjuna didnt want to interfere in this battle however kiishna ji motivated him to save satyaki at any cost which also shows that krishna ji himself was at times partial to his friends and family
but my main issue here is that killing people like karn,dury etc by deceit is fine since they were unfair to pandavs as well but what did Bhurvisas ever to do pandavs.He was fighting a fair battle with stayaki arjuna attacking burvisas from behind for satyaki cant be justified in any way
Infact if arjuna hand t interfered and stayaki would have been killed then this day would have ended as victory for kauravas
4)Gato baby also fought major battle with the main raksha of kaurava army Aalumba i think the name was and killed him