Feedback to CVs/ Story distortion # 3

First Previous

Page

117

Next Last

Frequent Posters

mysterieux

@mysterieux

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#161

Whats with Kunti tellling Bheeshma that Karna is her son. ..and karna knowing that he is padvas brother. he choose to fight the war because of his promise to Dury but he dint know the out come nor that Pandavas were his brothers...he found out later on in the middle of the war when kunti told him.

Yada yada hi Dharmasya was recited as a a part of the bhagvat how come they showed it before the bhagvat even started.

I know this from having read in the past but please feel to correct me if its wrong.

distorting the emotional quotient IMHO is allright because its an interpretation but changing what happened when and how is sacrilege.

Edited by mysterieux - 11 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#162

Originally posted by: rangeeni
i have to disagree, i have seen better portrayals of arjun and draupadi, but fair enough if youre a fan of them

draupadi's potrayal even though distorted at times is still nice atleast she is fiery.Arjuna's portrayal is distorted to a large extenet and over glorified that to at the expense of other character's

Fav or no fav mahabharat isnt the story of few character's its the story of many imperfect character's but ⭐️bahart has failed to portray that

Edited by Sabhayata - 11 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#163

Originally posted by: mysterieux
Whats with Kunti tellling Bheeshma that Karna is her son. ..and karna knowing that he is padvas brother. he choose to fight the war because of his promise to Dury but he dint know the out come nor that Pandavas were his brothers...he found out later on in the middle of the war when kunti told him.

hmmm no karna knew about his identity before the war only

Quote

Justitia

@Justitia

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#164

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Fav or no fav mahabharat isnt the story of few character's its the story of many imperfect character's but ⭐️bahart has failed to portray that

True...

And while the bondings in general have been shown well in ⭐️B, a few bondings have been blatantly ignored.

Wasn't Arjun supposed to be Bhishma's favourite grandson? Here, Bhishma blatantly refuses to give wedding blessings to Arjun & Subhi all thanks to ⭐️Krishna's wedding day prapanch...

And ⭐️Arjun seems to be way too trusting of ⭐️Pitamah for some reason (pre-dice game, and even AFTER the Virat battlefield negotiation). Epic Arjun hesitating to attack epic Bhishma due to the emotional connect is one thing, but there is no emotional connect as such in ⭐️B which exists between ⭐️Arjun & ⭐️Pitamah...or at least as much as it was in the epic.

Bhishma is one of the 12 greatest devotees of Krishna. He is also supposed to deliver the Vishnu Sahasranaamam to Yudi post-war.

What has the Krishna-Bhishma equation been turned into in ⭐️B?

Krishna-Pandava equation was a lot stronger in the epic than in ⭐️B. Here it seems like Krishna is a Pandava ally for the sake of Draupadi (& to a certain extent, Arjun). Kaliyugis might never be able to figure out Yudi, but Krishna did. And, that is why in the epic, Krishna actually had a deep amount of reverence for Yudi...

Sahdev is supposed to be Kunti ka laadla, and if I'm not mistaken, Yudi was Vidur's favourite (being the two anshas of Dharma)...what has Vidur been reduced to ⭐️B?

Edited by -Shani- - 11 years ago

Quote

halfbloodprince

@WindsOfHeaven

Achiever

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#165

Bhishma's character distortion doesn't seem to end on Arjuna and Krishna. They have made him a man with double standards and pretty ignorant towards his pledge, duties. He didn't marry resembling the epic's Bhishma, this is the sole saving grace.

Quote

ankit_34

@ankit_34

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#166

One of the things which i dont like abt the show is hw it has been shown bhishma's huge majboori to fight fr hastinapur as if he is just waiting to die ..bt in reality it wasnt the case of course he wanted yudi to be the king bt he never wanted any of his grandchildren to get killed he loved duryodhan equally ...so the reason he was fighting for kurus was to save duryodhan actlly he believed i wont kill pandavs and dey wont be able to kill duryodhan and the war will end in a stale mate ..bt here its rlly unbelievable hw bhishma has nothing towards duri and hw duri just want to use him to win the war

Quote

halfbloodprince

@WindsOfHeaven

Achiever

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#167

Also..anyone comes and insults Bhishma here. Sometimes I feel that Shakuni receives more respect than him in Starbharata. 🤢

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#168

Originally posted by: -Shruti
Also..anyone comes and insults Bhishma here. Sometimes I feel that Shakuni receives more respect than him in Starbharata. 🤢

Actually, ⭐️B has made Shakuni a clown as well, but few who haven't read the original recensions, be it KMG or any of the others, would know it.