Feedback to CVs/ Story distortion # 3 - Page 10

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

134.6k

Users

95

Likes

4.4k

Frequent Posters

amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#91

Originally posted by: -Shani-

Even IF Vyasa's Draupadi had known the outcome of the war beforehand, she certainly would NOT have said,"I don't want the war".

Because Vyasa's Draupadi was completely fire. And that is why she kept on reminding her hubbies about what happened to her. To her, getting justice for herself mattered the most.
Which is why, in the epic, anybody talking of peace would be at the receiving end of her whiplash tongue.

In this case, ⭐️Drau HERSELF says,"I don't want war..." 🤢

Like seriously, what is the point of her character in the story then? Is this really the woman who is supposed to be Krishna's biggest instrument so as to fight adharma in this story?

Well I disagree on the part, that if Draupadi had known about her sons' future, then she would have still said "I want war".
Honestly, we don't know, how she would have reacted, if she had known the future, do we?
She may not have said "I don't war", but her resolve would have been weakened for sure.
She may have been like fire, but I don't think any mother would be that cruel.
Besides, if justice for herself really mattered to her the most, then the death of her own sons would also be some kind of an injustice for her, isn't it? After all the miseries she had gone through, why would she want that?
But then, I agree with the main post.
I don't know why the CVs are showing things as if Draupadi decided everything?
Who was she? Only an influential queen at most.
And if I am not mistaken, then the King made the final decision. No queen was important enough in those days that she would dictate the future of the common people and declare war.
And despite all the tongue-lashing and brain-washing of Draupadi for 13 years, the Pandavas were ready to avoid war in return for 5 villages.
Although, I loved the Krishna-Leela episodes, I am not liking how the CVs are trying to put this all on the shoulders of Draupadi.
Yes, Draupadi wanted war, and she didn't know the outcome would be so devastating.
And she brain-washed and tongue-lashed her husbands, but she was still NOT the one to decide such an important thing.
I don't know what the CVs are trying to prove?
FollowYourHeart thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#92
they really need to buck up on the Madhav Paarth front...the story is almost over and they haven't even shown one scene where Madhav tells Paarth that if he is Narayan then Paarth is Nar meaning they r ONE...hell Keshav was willing to break the vow he gave to Balram that he won't raise weapons in the war coz he was afraid and firghtened for Arjun's life and safety, and mere thought of losing him wld kill him to the extent that he was willing to break all rules and all vows and promises...I don't see that kind of deep ingrained bond btw Star Bharath's Madhav and Paarth

And don't get me started on Raadhey and Duri's relationship, they have reduced this epic friendship to nothing more than extortion, exploitation...Radhey has become a mere pawn in Duri's game nothing else, while in reality he was more than a brother to Duri, the way he cried and mourned upon Radhey's death...omg...I felt shudders inside me and it was genuine mourning for his lost friend, not for his lost senapati...I don't know why they have turned Duri into all evil, he was evil there is no doubt abt that but none the less he had certain things abt him which did ignite a spark of inspiration and respect,,,,hate the way they have shown that all he is doing with Karna is using him like a tissue paper...that wasn't the case, he genuinely LOVED his Radhey...!!

As for Drau, personally I like this version of her better, the earlier one was way too self centered and self obsessed, she had ended up believing that the whole war was being waged just to avenge her and her honor, that might have been the trigger of it all but that wasn't the point of the war...I personally loved them showing her maternal side, it doesn't diminish her fire and pride and self respect in my eyes, if anything it makes me respect her more coz now I know she had it in her to not be blinded by her suffering, her insult, she was much more than a mere corpse who was alive only coz of the fire of vengeance burning in her...vengeance is weakness but fighting for justice is strength and is righteous...in old MB I felt Drau was in the habit of throwing tantrum and demanding this and that out of her husbands, more often than never it felt like as if she was blood thirsty and not desperate for justice...so i personally like this version better...but to each his own😃
_Grey_ thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#93
Gr8 post .totally agree wid u 👏 someone should tweet this to the cvs
HelloHell thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#94
i dont know what these people are planning to do but they seriously need to buck up on the parav..i mean cmon..they have already started with narayan shloka a long time bakk ..which is said in the starting of each parva (but everyone knows dat ..moving on )..which literally means salutations to narayana nara saraswati and ved vyaas...and what about the most important sentence in mahabharat ?? "tum naar ho paarth .. or me ?? me swayam narayan..." the part where krishna says the one who loves you loves me too .. and your enemy is mine...those who think we are two are limited in their intelligence because im in you and you are in me..narayana is nothing without nara..just like the body is incomplete without its soul...and nara will become an empty shell without narayana... we'd still exhist..but not live (like how arjun was after krishna's death practically a walking zombie ( a very handsome one :P))but the relationship shown between these too in starbharat dosnt hint anything of that sort.. i mean like arjun is not even being shown as a part of krishna...a soul mate ... they dont even LOOK at each other...😭 ... so imagine arjuns reaction when krishna throws all this knowledge on his face on a warfield..the weakness with which arjun is depicted uptil now he'd most likely faint or worse start crying..and who would save our mahanayak when he is in such a pitiful state ?? u guessed right miss.im too awesome or miss.i cant do anything wrong star panchali it is...😡 i miss watching MAHABHARAT guys... well all i can say is i hope madhav dosnt run off to sakhi during the 13th night of war leaving parth unconscious on the ground.. i mean who cares what parth feels as long as panchali is alright ?? 😡
WindsOfHeaven thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#95
Agree with you all..! StarKshetra is approaching..feeling afraid..😆
sootputri thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#96
everything revolves around star panchali because of the amount of popularity that she has weaned from lord knows what
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#97
Well I normally make positive posts and analysis post only.. But Karna fan inside me will never be satisfy if I just dont let it out.
I dont know if this topic will be allowed or may be they will merge it. But yes I do feel a need to make this topic in main post Since I want to reach out to more audience.
There have been many distortions in Star Plus show Mahabharat. We all have complained and bashed them a lot. I have heard it many times in this place that Karna's character is being whitewashed a lot. Well I would not deny that CVs have always shown him on white side more even when he was not. But to those who think this way...I would like to say that Creatives have given an answer by snatching away the scene which so rightly depicted who real karna was...and why he is still loved by so many. Yes Krishna-Karna conversation was not only Karna's birth revelation. But it was a test for Karna as well,A test where he came out strongly winning hearts.. He was offered throne to hastinapur which was not shown. He could have easily joined other side. But his side of argument were never shown in the show.
Apart from that- It was not shown that he himself asked Krishna not to reveal his identity to pandavas since they would not fight with him instead will give him throne which ultimately should be theirs..
Karna always regarded his foster parents as his own even after knowing the truth. He never said He wasnt a Radheya. Instead he proudly claimed even to Kunti that Radha was his mother.Yes Karna was at fault in his life many a times. But then there were some moments in his life and Mahabharat which makes him come out as a true gem of human being . As someone who kept everyone interest in his mind... and never his own.
If any one wants to read actual conversation of Krishna-Karna,Please refer this post by Sabhyata and judge yourself how much of truth was shown.
Just a genuine request if it somehow reaches people who can make difference- We dont want him to be glorified for things he never did and how he never behaved...Atleast do show him respect for things he did... things he is famous for. ...
Edited by riti4u - 11 years ago
Pehchaan.Kaun thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#98
👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼
⭐️Karna is being whitewashed where it's not necessary.. And is omitting the parts where he was truly a hero.. Both ways they are distorting his character 😡 Won't it be just BETTER to simply show what it was.. ??
I am wondering if they would show Karna-Indra interaction at all or not He is truly the hero of MB who was appreciated by one and all by the end he embraced death due to misfortune.. Even God couldn't help but appreciate him
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#99

Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun

👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼 👍🏼

⭐️Karna is being whitewashed where it's not necessary.. And is omitting the parts where he was truly a hero.. Both ways they are distorting his character 😡 Won't it be just BETTER to simply show what it was.. ??
I am wondering if they would show Karna-Indra interaction at all or not He is truly the hero of MB who was appreciated by one and all by the end he embraced death due to misfortune.. Even God couldn't help but appreciate him

Thanks dear.
Yes this distortion was just unbearable and heart breaking... I have no expectations from CVs.. I know KK daan also will be distorted... to make Indra's character more good..
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
completely agree riti

i have interacted with many karna fans on this forum i can say most of us would have preferred to see karna's full role in VH or other dury's schemes than the distorted scenes in which karna's true glory lies

like you said his conversation with krishna,kunti and indra is what makes karna's character complete.In the epic atleast before his conversation with krishna he is just an ally of dury who hates pandavs and wants to get rid of them kind of an antagonist.But this is where you truly understand his heartfelt feelings the kind if sacrifice this man is capable of making.This conversation shows that karna has more shades to his character than it seems that he is more than just an enemy of pandavas.This is the point where his positive characteristics shines out brightly.But makers have failed to comprehend this and portray it

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".