Feedback to CVs thread- Story distortion#2 - Page 35

StarKrishna's one statement to StarArjuna really bothered me yesterday - "(Star)Draupadi has done a big UPKAAR on the (Star)Pandavas by choosing to marry all five of them". CVs are still harping about that imaginary "sanyaas" clause...😒

Originally posted by: shani88

StarKrishna's one statement to StarArjuna really bothered me yesterday - "(Star)Draupadi has done a big UPKAAR on the (Star)Pandavas by choosing to marry all five of them". CVs are still harping about that imaginary "sanyaas" clause...😒

I can understand that the Pandavas got a kingdom of their own only after they went back to HP after their marriage to Draupadi - so THAT could be considered an "upkaar" of sorts.

But how is the polyandrous marriage per se an UPKAAR in itself?!? On the one hand, as per the CVs "This marriage will lead to dharma ki sthapana throughout Aaryavart" (with StarKrishna giving StarDrau the five blue stones of Dharma and whatnot). And now, StarKrishna himself calls the decision of the polyandrous marriage itself an "upkaar" done by Draupadi towards the Pandavas!!! Then why talk about "Dharma ki sthapana" and all that fancy talk - if it is just an "upkaar"??

Makes me wonder if after the dice game, StarKrishna might have serious thoughts about joining the Kaurava side for Kurukshetra...or the CVs will have to give some serious justification for Yudi staking Drau and the mute passivity of the Pandavas during the vastraharan.

If I have to use StarDuri's words - "Draupadi ke (so-called) upkaar ka yeh prati-phal mil raha hai?!?"

Originally posted by: ashwi_d

I like Draupadi as a character, but they are going overboard in glorifying her rather than present her as human.

Where is the pride that one associates with Draupadi? Stardraupadi instead thinks that war is

bad and felling trees is a sin. She makes all the 'sacrifices'. They have turned Draupadi into vehicle for the show's 'social messages'.

Yes! I was simply taken aback when StarKrishna uttered that she did a 'Upkaar' on the five brothers. Contradictions...double standards! Uff!

Originally posted by: -Shruti

Yes! I was simply taken aback when StarKrishna uttered that she did a 'Upkaar' on the five brothers. Contradictions...double standards! Uff!

I dont understand why all serials are hell bent upon showing subhadra kidnapping arjun while it was the other way around. The chapter is called Subhadra-Harana Parva and not Arjun-Harana. its arjun who abducts subhadra on being told to do so by krishna.

😡

i do understand that now for us its seems much more romantic but its quite a dare for a girl in those days to abduct a warrior that too arjun!! and wouldnt it have been considered utmost insult to arjun then?
😕

well at least StarArjun's face was worth watching when StarSubhadra says that i can abduct your Partha!
StarArjuna was like

Originally posted by: bhas1066

I dont understand why all serials are hell bent upon showing subhadra kidnapping arjun while it was the other way around. The chapter is called Subhadra-Harana Parva and not Arjun-Harana. its arjun who abducts subhadra on being told to do so by krishna.

Originally posted by: ashwi_d

Where is the pride that one associates with Draupadi? Stardraupadi instead thinks that war is

bad and felling trees is a sin. She makes all the 'sacrifices'. They have turned Draupadi into vehicle for the show's 'social messages'.

yes StarDrau is very Mahaan.She sacrificed her true love StarArjuna and married all five pandvas which is a big adharam for greator good and now has to be loyal to 5 pandavas as well.What a sacrifice 😭

I think we should just forget that this is supposed to be Mahabharat and watch it like a regular fiction. May be we can digest it better then. 😆